Survival in hemodialysis in Brazil according to the source of payment for the treatment: Public Healthcare System (SUS) versus private insurance

INTRODUCTION: Brazil has the largest public and universal healthcare system in the world, but little is known about the outcomes of patients on hemodialysis (HD) in the country according to the source of funding for the treatment. OBJECTIVE: To compare the profile and survival of patients under HD treatment funded by the Public Healthcare System (SUS) to those with private insurance. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of adults undergoing HD between 2012 and 2017 in 21 dialysis centers in Brazil that provided both by the SUS and private health insurance. Participants, regardless of the paying source, received similar dialysis treatment. Data were censored after 60 months of follow-up or at the end of 2019. RESULTS: 4,945 patients were included, 59.7% of which were financed by the SUS. Patients financed by SUS, compared to those with private insurance, were younger (58 vs. 60 years; p < 0.0001) and with a lower prevalence of diabetes (35.8% vs. 40.9%; p < 0.0001). The 60-month survival rates in these groups were 51.1% and 52.1%, respectively (p = 0.85). In the analysis of the subdistribution proportional hazard ratio by the Fine-Gray model, including adjustment for concurrent outcomes, a significant increase in the risk ratio for death was found (1.22 [95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.43]) in patients with treatment funded by the SUS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients on HD with treatment funded by the SUS have a higher adjusted risk of death when compared to those with private insurance, despite similar dialysis treatment. Factors not directly related to dialysis therapy could explain this difference.