Cargando…

Assessment of Residual Pain and Dissatisfaction in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Methods Matter

BACKGROUND: Residual pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) refers to knee pain after 3 to 6 months postoperatively. The estimates of the proportion of patients who experience residual pain after TKA vary widely. We hypothesized that the variation may stem from the range of methods used to assess...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Musbahi, Omar, Collins, Jamie E., Yang, Heidi, Selzer, Faith, Chen, Antonia F., Lange, Jeffrey, Losina, Elena, Katz, Jeffrey N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10697603/
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00077
_version_ 1785154784418856960
author Musbahi, Omar
Collins, Jamie E.
Yang, Heidi
Selzer, Faith
Chen, Antonia F.
Lange, Jeffrey
Losina, Elena
Katz, Jeffrey N.
author_facet Musbahi, Omar
Collins, Jamie E.
Yang, Heidi
Selzer, Faith
Chen, Antonia F.
Lange, Jeffrey
Losina, Elena
Katz, Jeffrey N.
author_sort Musbahi, Omar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Residual pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) refers to knee pain after 3 to 6 months postoperatively. The estimates of the proportion of patients who experience residual pain after TKA vary widely. We hypothesized that the variation may stem from the range of methods used to assess residual pain. We analyzed data from 2 prospective studies to assess the proportion of subjects with residual pain as defined by several commonly used metrics and to examine the association of residual pain defined by each metric with participant dissatisfaction. METHODS: We combined participant data from 2 prospective studies of TKA outcomes from subjects recruited between 2011 and 2014. Residual pain was defined using a range of metrics based on the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) pain score (0 to 100, in which 100 indicates worst), including the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS). We also examined combinations of MCID and PASS cutoffs. Subjects self-reported dissatisfaction following TKA, and we defined dissatisfied as somewhat or very dissatisfied at 12 months. We calculated the proportion of participants with residual pain, as defined by each metric, who reported dissatisfaction. We examined the association of each metric with dissatisfaction by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and Youden index. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 417 subjects with a mean age (and standard deviation) of 66.3 ± 8.3 years. Twenty-six participants (6.2%) were dissatisfied. The proportion of participants defined as having residual pain according to the various metrics ranged from 5.5% to >50%. The composite metric Improvement in WOMAC pain score ≥20 points or final WOMAC pain score ≤25 had the highest positive predictive value for identifying dissatisfied subjects (0.54 [95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 0.71]). No metric had a Youden index of ≥50%. CONCLUSIONS: Different metrics provided a wide range of estimates of residual pain following TKA. No estimate was both sensitive and specific for dissatisfaction in patients who underwent TKA, underscoring that measures of residual pain should be defined explicitly in reports of TKA outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10697603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106976032023-12-06 Assessment of Residual Pain and Dissatisfaction in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Methods Matter Musbahi, Omar Collins, Jamie E. Yang, Heidi Selzer, Faith Chen, Antonia F. Lange, Jeffrey Losina, Elena Katz, Jeffrey N. JB JS Open Access Scientific Articles BACKGROUND: Residual pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) refers to knee pain after 3 to 6 months postoperatively. The estimates of the proportion of patients who experience residual pain after TKA vary widely. We hypothesized that the variation may stem from the range of methods used to assess residual pain. We analyzed data from 2 prospective studies to assess the proportion of subjects with residual pain as defined by several commonly used metrics and to examine the association of residual pain defined by each metric with participant dissatisfaction. METHODS: We combined participant data from 2 prospective studies of TKA outcomes from subjects recruited between 2011 and 2014. Residual pain was defined using a range of metrics based on the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) pain score (0 to 100, in which 100 indicates worst), including the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS). We also examined combinations of MCID and PASS cutoffs. Subjects self-reported dissatisfaction following TKA, and we defined dissatisfied as somewhat or very dissatisfied at 12 months. We calculated the proportion of participants with residual pain, as defined by each metric, who reported dissatisfaction. We examined the association of each metric with dissatisfaction by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and Youden index. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 417 subjects with a mean age (and standard deviation) of 66.3 ± 8.3 years. Twenty-six participants (6.2%) were dissatisfied. The proportion of participants defined as having residual pain according to the various metrics ranged from 5.5% to >50%. The composite metric Improvement in WOMAC pain score ≥20 points or final WOMAC pain score ≤25 had the highest positive predictive value for identifying dissatisfied subjects (0.54 [95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 0.71]). No metric had a Youden index of ≥50%. CONCLUSIONS: Different metrics provided a wide range of estimates of residual pain following TKA. No estimate was both sensitive and specific for dissatisfaction in patients who underwent TKA, underscoring that measures of residual pain should be defined explicitly in reports of TKA outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2023-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10697603/ http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00077 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CC-BY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Scientific Articles
Musbahi, Omar
Collins, Jamie E.
Yang, Heidi
Selzer, Faith
Chen, Antonia F.
Lange, Jeffrey
Losina, Elena
Katz, Jeffrey N.
Assessment of Residual Pain and Dissatisfaction in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Methods Matter
title Assessment of Residual Pain and Dissatisfaction in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Methods Matter
title_full Assessment of Residual Pain and Dissatisfaction in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Methods Matter
title_fullStr Assessment of Residual Pain and Dissatisfaction in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Methods Matter
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Residual Pain and Dissatisfaction in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Methods Matter
title_short Assessment of Residual Pain and Dissatisfaction in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Methods Matter
title_sort assessment of residual pain and dissatisfaction in total knee arthroplasty: methods matter
topic Scientific Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10697603/
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00077
work_keys_str_mv AT musbahiomar assessmentofresidualpainanddissatisfactionintotalkneearthroplastymethodsmatter
AT collinsjamiee assessmentofresidualpainanddissatisfactionintotalkneearthroplastymethodsmatter
AT yangheidi assessmentofresidualpainanddissatisfactionintotalkneearthroplastymethodsmatter
AT selzerfaith assessmentofresidualpainanddissatisfactionintotalkneearthroplastymethodsmatter
AT chenantoniaf assessmentofresidualpainanddissatisfactionintotalkneearthroplastymethodsmatter
AT langejeffrey assessmentofresidualpainanddissatisfactionintotalkneearthroplastymethodsmatter
AT losinaelena assessmentofresidualpainanddissatisfactionintotalkneearthroplastymethodsmatter
AT katzjeffreyn assessmentofresidualpainanddissatisfactionintotalkneearthroplastymethodsmatter