Long-term management and treatment of acute intermittent porphyria with recurring attacks using pharmacological prophylaxis

BACKGROUND: There is no definitive guidance on whether patients with acute intermittent porphyria (AIP) with recurrent attacks need pharmacological prophylactic treatment. METHODS: The management strategies for patients with frequent (defined as ≥4 annualized attack rate (AAR) and less frequent attacks (<4 AAR), including treatment for acute attacks and duration of prophylaxis (weekly heme arginate 3 mg/kg body weight and/or investigational drug, givosiran), were summarized. The AAR for the following periods were presented: the first 2 years after diagnosis, before/after prophylaxis, and the most recent 2 years. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients with AIP were included, 19 (34.5%) had <4 AAR and 10 (65.6%) had ≥4 AAR in the first 2 years after diagnosis. All patients experienced reduced attacks during the treatment course, 23 (79.3%) were attack-free during the most recent 2 years. Among the 9 patients who received prophylaxis (7 heme arginate; 1 givosiran, 1 heme arginate followed by givosiran), 5 (55.6%) were attack-free in the most recent 2-year period and prophylaxis was discontinued because there had been no attacks for >1 year. For patients without prophylaxis (n = 20), 18 (90.0%) were attack-free in the most recent 2-year period and 15 (75.0%) experienced attacks only in the first 2 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylaxis could be considered for patients with AIP with ≥4 biochemically confirmed attacks/year after routine treatment of 1–2 years, during which the severity and frequency of attacks should be closely monitored to determine the necessity of pharmacologic prophylaxis. More studies are needed to reach a consensus on the use of pharmacological prophylaxis and treatment of AIP.