Cargando…
Attempt to Establish Prognostic Predictive System for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Artificial Intelligence for Assistance with Selection of Treatment Modality
INTRODUCTION: Because of recent developments in treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), methods for determining suitable therapy for initial or recurrent HCC have become important. This study used artificial intelligence (AI) findings to establish a system for predicting prognosis of HCC pati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
S. Karger AG
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10697750/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000530078 |
_version_ | 1785154806395961344 |
---|---|
author | Hiraoka, Atsushi Kumada, Takashi Tada, Toshifumi Toyoda, Hidenori Kariyama, Kazuya Hatanaka, Takeshi Kakizaki, Satoru Naganuma, Atsushi Itobayashi, Ei Tsuji, Kunihiko Ishikawa, Toru Ohama, Hideko Tada, Fujimasa Nouso, Kazuhiro |
author_facet | Hiraoka, Atsushi Kumada, Takashi Tada, Toshifumi Toyoda, Hidenori Kariyama, Kazuya Hatanaka, Takeshi Kakizaki, Satoru Naganuma, Atsushi Itobayashi, Ei Tsuji, Kunihiko Ishikawa, Toru Ohama, Hideko Tada, Fujimasa Nouso, Kazuhiro |
author_sort | Hiraoka, Atsushi |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Because of recent developments in treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), methods for determining suitable therapy for initial or recurrent HCC have become important. This study used artificial intelligence (AI) findings to establish a system for predicting prognosis of HCC patients at time of reoccurrence based on clinical data as a reference for selection of treatment modalities. METHODS: As a training cohort, 5,701 observations obtained at the initial and each subsequent treatment for recurrence from 1,985 HCC patients at a single center from 2000 to 2021 were used. The validation cohort included 5,692 observations from patients at multiple centers obtained at the time of the initial treatment. An AI calculating system (PRAID) was constructed based on 25 clinical factors noted at each treatment from the training cohort, and then predictive prognostic values for 1- and 3-year survival in both cohorts were evaluated. RESULTS: After exclusion of patients lacking clinical data regarding albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade or tumor-node-metastasis stage of the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan, 6th edition (TNM-LCSGJ 6th), ALBI-TNM-LCSGJ 6th (ALBI-T) and modified ALBI-T scores confirmed that prognosis for patients in both cohorts was similar. The area under the curve for prediction of both 1- and 3-year survival in the validation cohort was 0.841 (sensitivity 0.933 [95% CI: 0.925–0.940], specificity 0.517 [95% CI: 0.484–0.549]) and 0.796 (sensitivity 0.806 [95% CI: 0.790–0.821], specificity 0.646 [95% CI: 0.624–0.668]), respectively. CONCLUSION: The present PRAID system might provide useful prognostic information related to short and medium survival for decision-making regarding the best therapeutic modality for both initial and recurrent HCC cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10697750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | S. Karger AG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106977502023-12-06 Attempt to Establish Prognostic Predictive System for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Artificial Intelligence for Assistance with Selection of Treatment Modality Hiraoka, Atsushi Kumada, Takashi Tada, Toshifumi Toyoda, Hidenori Kariyama, Kazuya Hatanaka, Takeshi Kakizaki, Satoru Naganuma, Atsushi Itobayashi, Ei Tsuji, Kunihiko Ishikawa, Toru Ohama, Hideko Tada, Fujimasa Nouso, Kazuhiro Liver Cancer Research Article INTRODUCTION: Because of recent developments in treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), methods for determining suitable therapy for initial or recurrent HCC have become important. This study used artificial intelligence (AI) findings to establish a system for predicting prognosis of HCC patients at time of reoccurrence based on clinical data as a reference for selection of treatment modalities. METHODS: As a training cohort, 5,701 observations obtained at the initial and each subsequent treatment for recurrence from 1,985 HCC patients at a single center from 2000 to 2021 were used. The validation cohort included 5,692 observations from patients at multiple centers obtained at the time of the initial treatment. An AI calculating system (PRAID) was constructed based on 25 clinical factors noted at each treatment from the training cohort, and then predictive prognostic values for 1- and 3-year survival in both cohorts were evaluated. RESULTS: After exclusion of patients lacking clinical data regarding albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade or tumor-node-metastasis stage of the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan, 6th edition (TNM-LCSGJ 6th), ALBI-TNM-LCSGJ 6th (ALBI-T) and modified ALBI-T scores confirmed that prognosis for patients in both cohorts was similar. The area under the curve for prediction of both 1- and 3-year survival in the validation cohort was 0.841 (sensitivity 0.933 [95% CI: 0.925–0.940], specificity 0.517 [95% CI: 0.484–0.549]) and 0.796 (sensitivity 0.806 [95% CI: 0.790–0.821], specificity 0.646 [95% CI: 0.624–0.668]), respectively. CONCLUSION: The present PRAID system might provide useful prognostic information related to short and medium survival for decision-making regarding the best therapeutic modality for both initial and recurrent HCC cases. S. Karger AG 2023-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10697750/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000530078 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC) (http://www.karger.com/Services/OpenAccessLicense). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hiraoka, Atsushi Kumada, Takashi Tada, Toshifumi Toyoda, Hidenori Kariyama, Kazuya Hatanaka, Takeshi Kakizaki, Satoru Naganuma, Atsushi Itobayashi, Ei Tsuji, Kunihiko Ishikawa, Toru Ohama, Hideko Tada, Fujimasa Nouso, Kazuhiro Attempt to Establish Prognostic Predictive System for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Artificial Intelligence for Assistance with Selection of Treatment Modality |
title | Attempt to Establish Prognostic Predictive System for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Artificial Intelligence for Assistance with Selection of Treatment Modality |
title_full | Attempt to Establish Prognostic Predictive System for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Artificial Intelligence for Assistance with Selection of Treatment Modality |
title_fullStr | Attempt to Establish Prognostic Predictive System for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Artificial Intelligence for Assistance with Selection of Treatment Modality |
title_full_unstemmed | Attempt to Establish Prognostic Predictive System for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Artificial Intelligence for Assistance with Selection of Treatment Modality |
title_short | Attempt to Establish Prognostic Predictive System for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Artificial Intelligence for Assistance with Selection of Treatment Modality |
title_sort | attempt to establish prognostic predictive system for hepatocellular carcinoma using artificial intelligence for assistance with selection of treatment modality |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10697750/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000530078 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hiraokaatsushi attempttoestablishprognosticpredictivesystemforhepatocellularcarcinomausingartificialintelligenceforassistancewithselectionoftreatmentmodality AT kumadatakashi attempttoestablishprognosticpredictivesystemforhepatocellularcarcinomausingartificialintelligenceforassistancewithselectionoftreatmentmodality AT tadatoshifumi attempttoestablishprognosticpredictivesystemforhepatocellularcarcinomausingartificialintelligenceforassistancewithselectionoftreatmentmodality AT toyodahidenori attempttoestablishprognosticpredictivesystemforhepatocellularcarcinomausingartificialintelligenceforassistancewithselectionoftreatmentmodality AT kariyamakazuya attempttoestablishprognosticpredictivesystemforhepatocellularcarcinomausingartificialintelligenceforassistancewithselectionoftreatmentmodality AT hatanakatakeshi attempttoestablishprognosticpredictivesystemforhepatocellularcarcinomausingartificialintelligenceforassistancewithselectionoftreatmentmodality AT kakizakisatoru attempttoestablishprognosticpredictivesystemforhepatocellularcarcinomausingartificialintelligenceforassistancewithselectionoftreatmentmodality AT naganumaatsushi attempttoestablishprognosticpredictivesystemforhepatocellularcarcinomausingartificialintelligenceforassistancewithselectionoftreatmentmodality AT itobayashiei attempttoestablishprognosticpredictivesystemforhepatocellularcarcinomausingartificialintelligenceforassistancewithselectionoftreatmentmodality AT tsujikunihiko attempttoestablishprognosticpredictivesystemforhepatocellularcarcinomausingartificialintelligenceforassistancewithselectionoftreatmentmodality AT ishikawatoru attempttoestablishprognosticpredictivesystemforhepatocellularcarcinomausingartificialintelligenceforassistancewithselectionoftreatmentmodality AT ohamahideko attempttoestablishprognosticpredictivesystemforhepatocellularcarcinomausingartificialintelligenceforassistancewithselectionoftreatmentmodality AT tadafujimasa attempttoestablishprognosticpredictivesystemforhepatocellularcarcinomausingartificialintelligenceforassistancewithselectionoftreatmentmodality AT nousokazuhiro attempttoestablishprognosticpredictivesystemforhepatocellularcarcinomausingartificialintelligenceforassistancewithselectionoftreatmentmodality AT attempttoestablishprognosticpredictivesystemforhepatocellularcarcinomausingartificialintelligenceforassistancewithselectionoftreatmentmodality |