Substrate discrimination in RNase P RNA-mediated cleavage: importance of the structural environment of the RNase P cleavage site

Like the translational elongation factor EF-Tu, RNase P interacts with a large number of substrates where RNase P with its RNA subunit generates tRNAs with matured 5′ termini by cleaving tRNA precursors immediately 5′ of the residue at +1, i.e. at the position that corresponds to the first residue in tRNA. Most tRNAs carry a G(+1)C(+72) base pair at the end of the aminoacyl acceptor-stem whereas in tRNA(Gln) G(+1)C(+72) is replaced with U(+1)A(+72). Here, we investigated RNase P RNA-mediated cleavage as a function of having G(+1)C(+72) versus U(+1)A(+72) in various substrate backgrounds, two full-size tRNA precursors (pre-tRNA(Gln) and pre-tRNA(Tyr)Su3) and a model RNA hairpin substrate (pATSer). Our data showed that replacement of G(+1)C(+72) with U(+1)A(+72) influenced ground state binding, cleavage efficiency under multiple and single turnover conditions in a substrate-dependent manner. Interestingly, we observed differences both in ground state binding and rate of cleavage comparing two full-size tRNA precursors, pre-tRNA(Gln) and pre-tRNA(Tyr)Su3. These findings provide evidence for substrate discrimination in RNase P RNA-mediated cleavage both at the level of binding, as previously observed for EF-Tu, as well as at the catalytic step. In our experiments where we used model substrate derivatives further indicated the importance of the +1/+72 base pair in substrate discrimination by RNase P RNA. Finally, we provide evidence that the structural architecture influences Mg(2+) binding, most likely in its vicinity.