Cargando…

EMBASE search strategies for identifying methodologically sound diagnostic studies for use by clinicians and researchers

BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis by clinicians is the cornerstone of decision making for recommending clinical interventions. The current best evidence from research concerning diagnostic tests changes unpredictably as science advances. Both clinicians and researchers need dependable access to publish...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilczynski, Nancy L, Haynes, R Brian
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1079845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15796772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-3-7
_version_ 1782123432979202048
author Wilczynski, Nancy L
Haynes, R Brian
author_facet Wilczynski, Nancy L
Haynes, R Brian
author_sort Wilczynski, Nancy L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis by clinicians is the cornerstone of decision making for recommending clinical interventions. The current best evidence from research concerning diagnostic tests changes unpredictably as science advances. Both clinicians and researchers need dependable access to published evidence concerning diagnostic accuracy. Bibliographic databases such as EMBASE provide the most widely available entrée to this literature. The objective of this study was to develop search strategies that optimize the retrieval of methodologically sound diagnostic studies from EMBASE for use by clinicians. METHODS: An analytic survey was conducted, comparing hand searches of 55 journals with retrievals from EMBASE for 4,843 candidate search terms and 6,574 combinations. All articles were rated using purpose and quality indicators, and clinically relevant diagnostic accuracy articles were categorized as 'pass' or 'fail' according to explicit criteria for scientific merit. Candidate search strategies were run in EMBASE, the retrievals being compared with the hand search data. The proposed search strategies were treated as "diagnostic tests" for sound studies and the manual review of the literature was treated as the "gold standard." The sensitivity, specificity, precision and accuracy of the search strategies were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 433 articles about diagnostic tests, 97 (22.4%) met basic criteria for scientific merit. Combinations of search terms reached peak sensitivities of 100% with specificity at 70.4%. Compared with best single terms, best multiple terms increased sensitivity for sound studies by 8.2% (absolute increase), but decreased specificity (absolute decrease 6%) when sensitivity was maximized. When terms were combined to maximize specificity, the single term "specificity.tw." (specificity of 98.2%) outperformed combinations of terms. CONCLUSION: Empirically derived search strategies combining indexing terms and textwords can achieve high sensitivity and specificity for retrieving sound diagnostic studies from EMBASE. These search filters will enhance the searching efforts of clinicians.
format Text
id pubmed-1079845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-10798452005-04-15 EMBASE search strategies for identifying methodologically sound diagnostic studies for use by clinicians and researchers Wilczynski, Nancy L Haynes, R Brian BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis by clinicians is the cornerstone of decision making for recommending clinical interventions. The current best evidence from research concerning diagnostic tests changes unpredictably as science advances. Both clinicians and researchers need dependable access to published evidence concerning diagnostic accuracy. Bibliographic databases such as EMBASE provide the most widely available entrée to this literature. The objective of this study was to develop search strategies that optimize the retrieval of methodologically sound diagnostic studies from EMBASE for use by clinicians. METHODS: An analytic survey was conducted, comparing hand searches of 55 journals with retrievals from EMBASE for 4,843 candidate search terms and 6,574 combinations. All articles were rated using purpose and quality indicators, and clinically relevant diagnostic accuracy articles were categorized as 'pass' or 'fail' according to explicit criteria for scientific merit. Candidate search strategies were run in EMBASE, the retrievals being compared with the hand search data. The proposed search strategies were treated as "diagnostic tests" for sound studies and the manual review of the literature was treated as the "gold standard." The sensitivity, specificity, precision and accuracy of the search strategies were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 433 articles about diagnostic tests, 97 (22.4%) met basic criteria for scientific merit. Combinations of search terms reached peak sensitivities of 100% with specificity at 70.4%. Compared with best single terms, best multiple terms increased sensitivity for sound studies by 8.2% (absolute increase), but decreased specificity (absolute decrease 6%) when sensitivity was maximized. When terms were combined to maximize specificity, the single term "specificity.tw." (specificity of 98.2%) outperformed combinations of terms. CONCLUSION: Empirically derived search strategies combining indexing terms and textwords can achieve high sensitivity and specificity for retrieving sound diagnostic studies from EMBASE. These search filters will enhance the searching efforts of clinicians. BioMed Central 2005-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC1079845/ /pubmed/15796772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-3-7 Text en Copyright © 2005 Wilczynski et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wilczynski, Nancy L
Haynes, R Brian
EMBASE search strategies for identifying methodologically sound diagnostic studies for use by clinicians and researchers
title EMBASE search strategies for identifying methodologically sound diagnostic studies for use by clinicians and researchers
title_full EMBASE search strategies for identifying methodologically sound diagnostic studies for use by clinicians and researchers
title_fullStr EMBASE search strategies for identifying methodologically sound diagnostic studies for use by clinicians and researchers
title_full_unstemmed EMBASE search strategies for identifying methodologically sound diagnostic studies for use by clinicians and researchers
title_short EMBASE search strategies for identifying methodologically sound diagnostic studies for use by clinicians and researchers
title_sort embase search strategies for identifying methodologically sound diagnostic studies for use by clinicians and researchers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1079845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15796772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-3-7
work_keys_str_mv AT wilczynskinancyl embasesearchstrategiesforidentifyingmethodologicallysounddiagnosticstudiesforusebycliniciansandresearchers
AT haynesrbrian embasesearchstrategiesforidentifyingmethodologicallysounddiagnosticstudiesforusebycliniciansandresearchers
AT embasesearchstrategiesforidentifyingmethodologicallysounddiagnosticstudiesforusebycliniciansandresearchers