Cargando…

Portals to Wonderland: Health portals lead to confusing information about the effects of health care

BACKGROUND: The Internet offers a seemingly endless amount of health information of varying quality. Health portals, which provide entry points to quality-controlled collections of websites, have been hailed as a solution to this problem. The objective of this study is to assess the extent to which...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glenton, Claire, Paulsen, Elizabeth J, Oxman, Andrew D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1079858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15769291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-5-7
_version_ 1782123436241321984
author Glenton, Claire
Paulsen, Elizabeth J
Oxman, Andrew D
author_facet Glenton, Claire
Paulsen, Elizabeth J
Oxman, Andrew D
author_sort Glenton, Claire
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Internet offers a seemingly endless amount of health information of varying quality. Health portals, which provide entry points to quality-controlled collections of websites, have been hailed as a solution to this problem. The objective of this study is to assess the extent to which government-run health portals provide access to relevant, valid and understandable information about the effects of health care. METHODS: We selected eight clinically relevant questions for which there was a systematic review, searched four portals for answers, and compared the answers we found to the results of the systematic reviews. RESULTS: Our searches resulted in 3400 hits, 155 of which mentioned both the condition and the intervention in one of the eight questions. Sixty-three of the 155 web pages did not give any information about the effect of the intervention. Seventy-seven qualitatively described the effects of the intervention. Twenty-six of these had information that was too unclear to be categorised; 15 were not consistent with the systematic review; and 36 were consistent with the review, but usually did not mention what happens without the intervention, what outcomes have been measured or when they were measured. Fifteen web pages quantitatively described effects. Four of these were abstracts from the systematic review, nine had information that was incomplete and potentially misleading because of a lack of information about people not receiving the intervention and the length of follow-up; one had information that was consistent with the review, but only referred to three trials whereas the review included six; and one was consistent with the review. CONCLUSION: Information accessible through health portals is unlikely to be based on systematic reviews and is often unclear, incomplete and misleading. Portals are only as good as the websites they lead to. Investments in national health portals are unlikely to benefit consumers without investments in the production and maintenance of relevant, valid and understandable information to which the portals lead.
format Text
id pubmed-1079858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-10798582005-04-15 Portals to Wonderland: Health portals lead to confusing information about the effects of health care Glenton, Claire Paulsen, Elizabeth J Oxman, Andrew D BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: The Internet offers a seemingly endless amount of health information of varying quality. Health portals, which provide entry points to quality-controlled collections of websites, have been hailed as a solution to this problem. The objective of this study is to assess the extent to which government-run health portals provide access to relevant, valid and understandable information about the effects of health care. METHODS: We selected eight clinically relevant questions for which there was a systematic review, searched four portals for answers, and compared the answers we found to the results of the systematic reviews. RESULTS: Our searches resulted in 3400 hits, 155 of which mentioned both the condition and the intervention in one of the eight questions. Sixty-three of the 155 web pages did not give any information about the effect of the intervention. Seventy-seven qualitatively described the effects of the intervention. Twenty-six of these had information that was too unclear to be categorised; 15 were not consistent with the systematic review; and 36 were consistent with the review, but usually did not mention what happens without the intervention, what outcomes have been measured or when they were measured. Fifteen web pages quantitatively described effects. Four of these were abstracts from the systematic review, nine had information that was incomplete and potentially misleading because of a lack of information about people not receiving the intervention and the length of follow-up; one had information that was consistent with the review, but only referred to three trials whereas the review included six; and one was consistent with the review. CONCLUSION: Information accessible through health portals is unlikely to be based on systematic reviews and is often unclear, incomplete and misleading. Portals are only as good as the websites they lead to. Investments in national health portals are unlikely to benefit consumers without investments in the production and maintenance of relevant, valid and understandable information to which the portals lead. BioMed Central 2005-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC1079858/ /pubmed/15769291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-5-7 Text en Copyright © 2005 Glenton et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Glenton, Claire
Paulsen, Elizabeth J
Oxman, Andrew D
Portals to Wonderland: Health portals lead to confusing information about the effects of health care
title Portals to Wonderland: Health portals lead to confusing information about the effects of health care
title_full Portals to Wonderland: Health portals lead to confusing information about the effects of health care
title_fullStr Portals to Wonderland: Health portals lead to confusing information about the effects of health care
title_full_unstemmed Portals to Wonderland: Health portals lead to confusing information about the effects of health care
title_short Portals to Wonderland: Health portals lead to confusing information about the effects of health care
title_sort portals to wonderland: health portals lead to confusing information about the effects of health care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1079858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15769291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-5-7
work_keys_str_mv AT glentonclaire portalstowonderlandhealthportalsleadtoconfusinginformationabouttheeffectsofhealthcare
AT paulsenelizabethj portalstowonderlandhealthportalsleadtoconfusinginformationabouttheeffectsofhealthcare
AT oxmanandrewd portalstowonderlandhealthportalsleadtoconfusinginformationabouttheeffectsofhealthcare