Cargando…

Scale and shape issues in focused cluster power for count data

BACKGROUND: Interest in the development of statistical methods for disease cluster detection has experienced rapid growth in recent years. Evaluations of statistical power provide important information for the selection of an appropriate statistical method in environmentally-related disease cluster...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Puett, Robin C, Lawson, Andrew B, Clark, Allan B, Aldrich, Tim E, Porter, Dwayne E, Feigley, Charles E, Hebert, James R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1079923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15801981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-4-8
_version_ 1782123454750785536
author Puett, Robin C
Lawson, Andrew B
Clark, Allan B
Aldrich, Tim E
Porter, Dwayne E
Feigley, Charles E
Hebert, James R
author_facet Puett, Robin C
Lawson, Andrew B
Clark, Allan B
Aldrich, Tim E
Porter, Dwayne E
Feigley, Charles E
Hebert, James R
author_sort Puett, Robin C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Interest in the development of statistical methods for disease cluster detection has experienced rapid growth in recent years. Evaluations of statistical power provide important information for the selection of an appropriate statistical method in environmentally-related disease cluster investigations. Published power evaluations have not yet addressed the use of models for focused cluster detection and have not fully investigated the issues of disease cluster scale and shape. As meteorological and other factors can impact the dispersion of environmental toxicants, it follows that environmental exposures and associated diseases can be dispersed in a variety of spatial patterns. This study simulates disease clusters in a variety of shapes and scales around a centrally located single pollution source. We evaluate the power of a range of focused cluster tests and generalized linear models to detect these various cluster shapes and scales for count data. RESULTS: In general, the power of hypothesis tests and models to detect focused clusters improved when the test or model included parameters specific to the shape of cluster being examined (i.e. inclusion of a function for direction improved power of models to detect clustering with an angular effect). However, power to detect clusters where the risk peaked and then declined was limited. CONCLUSION: Findings from this investigation show sizeable changes in power according to the scale and shape of the cluster and the test or model applied. These findings demonstrate the importance of selecting a test or model with functions appropriate to detect the spatial pattern of the disease cluster.
format Text
id pubmed-1079923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-10799232005-04-15 Scale and shape issues in focused cluster power for count data Puett, Robin C Lawson, Andrew B Clark, Allan B Aldrich, Tim E Porter, Dwayne E Feigley, Charles E Hebert, James R Int J Health Geogr Research BACKGROUND: Interest in the development of statistical methods for disease cluster detection has experienced rapid growth in recent years. Evaluations of statistical power provide important information for the selection of an appropriate statistical method in environmentally-related disease cluster investigations. Published power evaluations have not yet addressed the use of models for focused cluster detection and have not fully investigated the issues of disease cluster scale and shape. As meteorological and other factors can impact the dispersion of environmental toxicants, it follows that environmental exposures and associated diseases can be dispersed in a variety of spatial patterns. This study simulates disease clusters in a variety of shapes and scales around a centrally located single pollution source. We evaluate the power of a range of focused cluster tests and generalized linear models to detect these various cluster shapes and scales for count data. RESULTS: In general, the power of hypothesis tests and models to detect focused clusters improved when the test or model included parameters specific to the shape of cluster being examined (i.e. inclusion of a function for direction improved power of models to detect clustering with an angular effect). However, power to detect clusters where the risk peaked and then declined was limited. CONCLUSION: Findings from this investigation show sizeable changes in power according to the scale and shape of the cluster and the test or model applied. These findings demonstrate the importance of selecting a test or model with functions appropriate to detect the spatial pattern of the disease cluster. BioMed Central 2005-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC1079923/ /pubmed/15801981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-4-8 Text en Copyright © 2005 Puett et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Puett, Robin C
Lawson, Andrew B
Clark, Allan B
Aldrich, Tim E
Porter, Dwayne E
Feigley, Charles E
Hebert, James R
Scale and shape issues in focused cluster power for count data
title Scale and shape issues in focused cluster power for count data
title_full Scale and shape issues in focused cluster power for count data
title_fullStr Scale and shape issues in focused cluster power for count data
title_full_unstemmed Scale and shape issues in focused cluster power for count data
title_short Scale and shape issues in focused cluster power for count data
title_sort scale and shape issues in focused cluster power for count data
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1079923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15801981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-4-8
work_keys_str_mv AT puettrobinc scaleandshapeissuesinfocusedclusterpowerforcountdata
AT lawsonandrewb scaleandshapeissuesinfocusedclusterpowerforcountdata
AT clarkallanb scaleandshapeissuesinfocusedclusterpowerforcountdata
AT aldrichtime scaleandshapeissuesinfocusedclusterpowerforcountdata
AT porterdwaynee scaleandshapeissuesinfocusedclusterpowerforcountdata
AT feigleycharlese scaleandshapeissuesinfocusedclusterpowerforcountdata
AT hebertjamesr scaleandshapeissuesinfocusedclusterpowerforcountdata