Cargando…
Super paramagnetic clustering of protein sequences
BACKGROUND: Detection of sequence homologues represents a challenging task that is important for the discovery of protein families and the reliable application of automatic annotation methods. The presence of domains in protein families of diverse function, inhomogeneity and different sizes of prote...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1084344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15804359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-6-82 |
_version_ | 1782123797259747328 |
---|---|
author | Tetko, Igor V Facius, Axel Ruepp, Andreas Mewes, Hans-Werner |
author_facet | Tetko, Igor V Facius, Axel Ruepp, Andreas Mewes, Hans-Werner |
author_sort | Tetko, Igor V |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Detection of sequence homologues represents a challenging task that is important for the discovery of protein families and the reliable application of automatic annotation methods. The presence of domains in protein families of diverse function, inhomogeneity and different sizes of protein families create considerable difficulties for the application of published clustering methods. RESULTS: Our work analyses the Super Paramagnetic Clustering (SPC) and its extension, global SPC (gSPC) algorithm. These algorithms cluster input data based on a method that is analogous to the treatment of an inhomogeneous ferromagnet in physics. For the SwissProt and SCOP databases we show that the gSPC improves the specificity and sensitivity of clustering over the original SPC and Markov Cluster algorithm (TRIBE-MCL) up to 30%. The three algorithms provided similar results for the MIPS FunCat 1.3 annotation of four bacterial genomes, Bacillus subtilis, Helicobacter pylori, Listeria innocua and Listeria monocytogenes. However, the gSPC covered about 12% more sequences compared to the other methods. The SPC algorithm was programmed in house using C++ and it is available at . The FunCat annotation is available at . CONCLUSION: The gSPC calculated to a higher accuracy or covered a larger number of sequences than the TRIBE-MCL algorithm. Thus it is a useful approach for automatic detection of protein families and unsupervised annotation of full genomes. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1084344 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-10843442005-04-23 Super paramagnetic clustering of protein sequences Tetko, Igor V Facius, Axel Ruepp, Andreas Mewes, Hans-Werner BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Detection of sequence homologues represents a challenging task that is important for the discovery of protein families and the reliable application of automatic annotation methods. The presence of domains in protein families of diverse function, inhomogeneity and different sizes of protein families create considerable difficulties for the application of published clustering methods. RESULTS: Our work analyses the Super Paramagnetic Clustering (SPC) and its extension, global SPC (gSPC) algorithm. These algorithms cluster input data based on a method that is analogous to the treatment of an inhomogeneous ferromagnet in physics. For the SwissProt and SCOP databases we show that the gSPC improves the specificity and sensitivity of clustering over the original SPC and Markov Cluster algorithm (TRIBE-MCL) up to 30%. The three algorithms provided similar results for the MIPS FunCat 1.3 annotation of four bacterial genomes, Bacillus subtilis, Helicobacter pylori, Listeria innocua and Listeria monocytogenes. However, the gSPC covered about 12% more sequences compared to the other methods. The SPC algorithm was programmed in house using C++ and it is available at . The FunCat annotation is available at . CONCLUSION: The gSPC calculated to a higher accuracy or covered a larger number of sequences than the TRIBE-MCL algorithm. Thus it is a useful approach for automatic detection of protein families and unsupervised annotation of full genomes. BioMed Central 2005-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC1084344/ /pubmed/15804359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-6-82 Text en Copyright © 2005 Tetko et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Tetko, Igor V Facius, Axel Ruepp, Andreas Mewes, Hans-Werner Super paramagnetic clustering of protein sequences |
title | Super paramagnetic clustering of protein sequences |
title_full | Super paramagnetic clustering of protein sequences |
title_fullStr | Super paramagnetic clustering of protein sequences |
title_full_unstemmed | Super paramagnetic clustering of protein sequences |
title_short | Super paramagnetic clustering of protein sequences |
title_sort | super paramagnetic clustering of protein sequences |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1084344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15804359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-6-82 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tetkoigorv superparamagneticclusteringofproteinsequences AT faciusaxel superparamagneticclusteringofproteinsequences AT rueppandreas superparamagneticclusteringofproteinsequences AT meweshanswerner superparamagneticclusteringofproteinsequences |