Cargando…

Ultrasound image attributes of human ovarian dominant follicles during natural and oral contraceptive cycles

BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted analyses were used to examine ultrasound image attributes of human dominant ovarian follicles that developed during natural and oral contraceptive (OC) cycles. We hypothesized that image attributes of natural cycle follicles would quantitatively differ from those in OC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Birtch, Rebecca L, Baerwald, Angela R, Olatunbosun, Olufemi A, Pierson, Roger A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1087505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15829004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-3-12
_version_ 1782123818313056256
author Birtch, Rebecca L
Baerwald, Angela R
Olatunbosun, Olufemi A
Pierson, Roger A
author_facet Birtch, Rebecca L
Baerwald, Angela R
Olatunbosun, Olufemi A
Pierson, Roger A
author_sort Birtch, Rebecca L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted analyses were used to examine ultrasound image attributes of human dominant ovarian follicles that developed during natural and oral contraceptive (OC) cycles. We hypothesized that image attributes of natural cycle follicles would quantitatively differ from those in OC cycles and that OC cycle follicles would possess image attributes indicative of atresia. METHODS: Dominant ovarian follicles of 18 clinically normal women were compared using transvaginal ultrasonography for the 7 days before ovulation during a natural cycle (n = 9) or the 7 days before peak estradiol in women using OC (n = 11). Follicles were analyzed using region and line techniques designed to compare the image attributes numerical pixel value (NPV), pixel heterogeneity (PH) and area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: NPV was higher in OC cycle follicles with region analysis and tended to be higher with line analysis (p = 0.005 and p = 0.06, respectively). No differences were observed in two other image attributes (AUC and PH), measured with either technique, between natural and OC cycle follicles. CONCLUSION: The increased NPV value of OC cycle follicles and lack of differences in PH and AUC values between natural cycle and OC cycle follicles did not support the hypothesis that OC cycle follicles would show ultrasonographically detectable signs of atresia. Image attributes observed in OC cycle follicles were not clearly indicative of atresia nor were they large enough to preclude preovulatory physiologic status in OC cycle follicles.
format Text
id pubmed-1087505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-10875052005-04-28 Ultrasound image attributes of human ovarian dominant follicles during natural and oral contraceptive cycles Birtch, Rebecca L Baerwald, Angela R Olatunbosun, Olufemi A Pierson, Roger A Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted analyses were used to examine ultrasound image attributes of human dominant ovarian follicles that developed during natural and oral contraceptive (OC) cycles. We hypothesized that image attributes of natural cycle follicles would quantitatively differ from those in OC cycles and that OC cycle follicles would possess image attributes indicative of atresia. METHODS: Dominant ovarian follicles of 18 clinically normal women were compared using transvaginal ultrasonography for the 7 days before ovulation during a natural cycle (n = 9) or the 7 days before peak estradiol in women using OC (n = 11). Follicles were analyzed using region and line techniques designed to compare the image attributes numerical pixel value (NPV), pixel heterogeneity (PH) and area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: NPV was higher in OC cycle follicles with region analysis and tended to be higher with line analysis (p = 0.005 and p = 0.06, respectively). No differences were observed in two other image attributes (AUC and PH), measured with either technique, between natural and OC cycle follicles. CONCLUSION: The increased NPV value of OC cycle follicles and lack of differences in PH and AUC values between natural cycle and OC cycle follicles did not support the hypothesis that OC cycle follicles would show ultrasonographically detectable signs of atresia. Image attributes observed in OC cycle follicles were not clearly indicative of atresia nor were they large enough to preclude preovulatory physiologic status in OC cycle follicles. BioMed Central 2005-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC1087505/ /pubmed/15829004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-3-12 Text en Copyright © 2005 Birtch et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Birtch, Rebecca L
Baerwald, Angela R
Olatunbosun, Olufemi A
Pierson, Roger A
Ultrasound image attributes of human ovarian dominant follicles during natural and oral contraceptive cycles
title Ultrasound image attributes of human ovarian dominant follicles during natural and oral contraceptive cycles
title_full Ultrasound image attributes of human ovarian dominant follicles during natural and oral contraceptive cycles
title_fullStr Ultrasound image attributes of human ovarian dominant follicles during natural and oral contraceptive cycles
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound image attributes of human ovarian dominant follicles during natural and oral contraceptive cycles
title_short Ultrasound image attributes of human ovarian dominant follicles during natural and oral contraceptive cycles
title_sort ultrasound image attributes of human ovarian dominant follicles during natural and oral contraceptive cycles
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1087505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15829004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-3-12
work_keys_str_mv AT birtchrebeccal ultrasoundimageattributesofhumanovariandominantfolliclesduringnaturalandoralcontraceptivecycles
AT baerwaldangelar ultrasoundimageattributesofhumanovariandominantfolliclesduringnaturalandoralcontraceptivecycles
AT olatunbosunolufemia ultrasoundimageattributesofhumanovariandominantfolliclesduringnaturalandoralcontraceptivecycles
AT piersonrogera ultrasoundimageattributesofhumanovariandominantfolliclesduringnaturalandoralcontraceptivecycles