Cargando…

Transcriptional slippage in bacteria: distribution in sequenced genomes and utilization in IS element gene expression

BACKGROUND: Transcription slippage occurs on certain patterns of repeat mononucleotides, resulting in synthesis of a heterogeneous population of mRNAs. Individual mRNA molecules within this population differ in the number of nucleotides they contain that are not specified by the template. When trans...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baranov, Pavel V, Hammer, Andrew W, Zhou, Jiadong, Gesteland, Raymond F, Atkins, John F
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1088944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15774026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2005-6-3-r25
_version_ 1782123871373099008
author Baranov, Pavel V
Hammer, Andrew W
Zhou, Jiadong
Gesteland, Raymond F
Atkins, John F
author_facet Baranov, Pavel V
Hammer, Andrew W
Zhou, Jiadong
Gesteland, Raymond F
Atkins, John F
author_sort Baranov, Pavel V
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transcription slippage occurs on certain patterns of repeat mononucleotides, resulting in synthesis of a heterogeneous population of mRNAs. Individual mRNA molecules within this population differ in the number of nucleotides they contain that are not specified by the template. When transcriptional slippage occurs in a coding sequence, translation of the resulting mRNAs yields more than one protein product. Except where the products of the resulting mRNAs have distinct functions, transcription slippage occurring in a coding region is expected to be disadvantageous. This probably leads to selection against most slippage-prone sequences in coding regions. RESULTS: To find a length at which such selection is evident, we analyzed the distribution of repetitive runs of A and T of different lengths in 108 bacterial genomes. This length varies significantly among different bacteria, but in a large proportion of available genomes corresponds to nine nucleotides. Comparative sequence analysis of these genomes was used to identify occurrences of 9A and 9T transcriptional slippage-prone sequences used for gene expression. CONCLUSIONS: IS element genes are the largest group found to exploit this phenomenon. A number of genes with disrupted open reading frames (ORFs) have slippage-prone sequences at which transcriptional slippage would result in uninterrupted ORF restoration at the mRNA level. The ability of such genes to encode functional full-length protein products brings into question their annotation as pseudogenes and in these cases is pertinent to the significance of the term 'authentic frameshift' frequently assigned to such genes.
format Text
id pubmed-1088944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-10889442005-05-05 Transcriptional slippage in bacteria: distribution in sequenced genomes and utilization in IS element gene expression Baranov, Pavel V Hammer, Andrew W Zhou, Jiadong Gesteland, Raymond F Atkins, John F Genome Biol Research BACKGROUND: Transcription slippage occurs on certain patterns of repeat mononucleotides, resulting in synthesis of a heterogeneous population of mRNAs. Individual mRNA molecules within this population differ in the number of nucleotides they contain that are not specified by the template. When transcriptional slippage occurs in a coding sequence, translation of the resulting mRNAs yields more than one protein product. Except where the products of the resulting mRNAs have distinct functions, transcription slippage occurring in a coding region is expected to be disadvantageous. This probably leads to selection against most slippage-prone sequences in coding regions. RESULTS: To find a length at which such selection is evident, we analyzed the distribution of repetitive runs of A and T of different lengths in 108 bacterial genomes. This length varies significantly among different bacteria, but in a large proportion of available genomes corresponds to nine nucleotides. Comparative sequence analysis of these genomes was used to identify occurrences of 9A and 9T transcriptional slippage-prone sequences used for gene expression. CONCLUSIONS: IS element genes are the largest group found to exploit this phenomenon. A number of genes with disrupted open reading frames (ORFs) have slippage-prone sequences at which transcriptional slippage would result in uninterrupted ORF restoration at the mRNA level. The ability of such genes to encode functional full-length protein products brings into question their annotation as pseudogenes and in these cases is pertinent to the significance of the term 'authentic frameshift' frequently assigned to such genes. BioMed Central 2005 2005-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC1088944/ /pubmed/15774026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2005-6-3-r25 Text en Copyright © 2005 Baranov et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
spellingShingle Research
Baranov, Pavel V
Hammer, Andrew W
Zhou, Jiadong
Gesteland, Raymond F
Atkins, John F
Transcriptional slippage in bacteria: distribution in sequenced genomes and utilization in IS element gene expression
title Transcriptional slippage in bacteria: distribution in sequenced genomes and utilization in IS element gene expression
title_full Transcriptional slippage in bacteria: distribution in sequenced genomes and utilization in IS element gene expression
title_fullStr Transcriptional slippage in bacteria: distribution in sequenced genomes and utilization in IS element gene expression
title_full_unstemmed Transcriptional slippage in bacteria: distribution in sequenced genomes and utilization in IS element gene expression
title_short Transcriptional slippage in bacteria: distribution in sequenced genomes and utilization in IS element gene expression
title_sort transcriptional slippage in bacteria: distribution in sequenced genomes and utilization in is element gene expression
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1088944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15774026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2005-6-3-r25
work_keys_str_mv AT baranovpavelv transcriptionalslippageinbacteriadistributioninsequencedgenomesandutilizationiniselementgeneexpression
AT hammerandreww transcriptionalslippageinbacteriadistributioninsequencedgenomesandutilizationiniselementgeneexpression
AT zhoujiadong transcriptionalslippageinbacteriadistributioninsequencedgenomesandutilizationiniselementgeneexpression
AT gestelandraymondf transcriptionalslippageinbacteriadistributioninsequencedgenomesandutilizationiniselementgeneexpression
AT atkinsjohnf transcriptionalslippageinbacteriadistributioninsequencedgenomesandutilizationiniselementgeneexpression