Cargando…

Promiscuous drugs compared to selective drugs (promiscuity can be a virtue)

BACKGROUND: The word selectivity describes a drug's ability to affect a particular cell population in preference to others. As part of the current state of art in the search for new therapeutic agents, the property of selectivity is a mode of action thought to have a high degree of desirability...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mencher, Simon K, Wang, Long G
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1090568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15854222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-5-3
_version_ 1782123887308308480
author Mencher, Simon K
Wang, Long G
author_facet Mencher, Simon K
Wang, Long G
author_sort Mencher, Simon K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The word selectivity describes a drug's ability to affect a particular cell population in preference to others. As part of the current state of art in the search for new therapeutic agents, the property of selectivity is a mode of action thought to have a high degree of desirability. Consequently there is a growing activity in this area of research. Selectivity is generally a worthy property in a drug because a drug having high selectivity may have a dramatic effect when there is a single agent that can be targeted against the appropriate molecular-driver involved in the pathogenesis of a disease. An example is chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). CML has a specific chromosomal abnormality, the Philadelphia chromosome, that results in a single gene that produces an abnormal protein DISCUSSION: There is a burgeoning understanding of the cellular mechanisms that control the etiology and pathogeneses of diseases. This understanding both enables and motivates the development of drugs that induce a specific action in a selected cell population; i.e., a targeted treatment. Consequently, drugs that can target distinct molecular targets involved in pathologic/pathogenetic processes, or signal-transduction pathways, are being developed. However, in most cases, diseases involve multiple abnormalities. A disease may be associated with more than one dysfunctional protein and these may be out-of-balance with each other. Likewise a drug might strongly target a protein that shares a similar active domain with other proteins. A drug may also target pleiotropic cytokines, or other proteins that have multi-physiological functions. In this way multiple normal cellular pathways can be simultaneously influenced. Long term experience with drugs supposedly designed for only a single target, but which unavoidably involve other functional effects, is uncovering the fact that molecular targeting is not medically flawless. SUMMARY: We contend that an ideal drug may be one whose efficacy is based not on the inhibition of a single target, but rather on the rebalancing of the several proteins or events, that contribute to the etiology, pathogeneses, and progression of diseases, i.e., in effect a promiscuous drug. Ideally, if this could be done at minimum drug concentration, side effects could be minimized. Corollaries to this argument are that the growing fervor for researching truly selective drugs may be imprudent when considering the totality of responses; and that the expensive screening techniques used to discover these, may be both medically and financially inefficient.
format Text
id pubmed-1090568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-10905682005-05-07 Promiscuous drugs compared to selective drugs (promiscuity can be a virtue) Mencher, Simon K Wang, Long G BMC Clin Pharmacol Debate BACKGROUND: The word selectivity describes a drug's ability to affect a particular cell population in preference to others. As part of the current state of art in the search for new therapeutic agents, the property of selectivity is a mode of action thought to have a high degree of desirability. Consequently there is a growing activity in this area of research. Selectivity is generally a worthy property in a drug because a drug having high selectivity may have a dramatic effect when there is a single agent that can be targeted against the appropriate molecular-driver involved in the pathogenesis of a disease. An example is chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). CML has a specific chromosomal abnormality, the Philadelphia chromosome, that results in a single gene that produces an abnormal protein DISCUSSION: There is a burgeoning understanding of the cellular mechanisms that control the etiology and pathogeneses of diseases. This understanding both enables and motivates the development of drugs that induce a specific action in a selected cell population; i.e., a targeted treatment. Consequently, drugs that can target distinct molecular targets involved in pathologic/pathogenetic processes, or signal-transduction pathways, are being developed. However, in most cases, diseases involve multiple abnormalities. A disease may be associated with more than one dysfunctional protein and these may be out-of-balance with each other. Likewise a drug might strongly target a protein that shares a similar active domain with other proteins. A drug may also target pleiotropic cytokines, or other proteins that have multi-physiological functions. In this way multiple normal cellular pathways can be simultaneously influenced. Long term experience with drugs supposedly designed for only a single target, but which unavoidably involve other functional effects, is uncovering the fact that molecular targeting is not medically flawless. SUMMARY: We contend that an ideal drug may be one whose efficacy is based not on the inhibition of a single target, but rather on the rebalancing of the several proteins or events, that contribute to the etiology, pathogeneses, and progression of diseases, i.e., in effect a promiscuous drug. Ideally, if this could be done at minimum drug concentration, side effects could be minimized. Corollaries to this argument are that the growing fervor for researching truly selective drugs may be imprudent when considering the totality of responses; and that the expensive screening techniques used to discover these, may be both medically and financially inefficient. BioMed Central 2005-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC1090568/ /pubmed/15854222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-5-3 Text en Copyright © 2005 Mencher and Wang; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Debate
Mencher, Simon K
Wang, Long G
Promiscuous drugs compared to selective drugs (promiscuity can be a virtue)
title Promiscuous drugs compared to selective drugs (promiscuity can be a virtue)
title_full Promiscuous drugs compared to selective drugs (promiscuity can be a virtue)
title_fullStr Promiscuous drugs compared to selective drugs (promiscuity can be a virtue)
title_full_unstemmed Promiscuous drugs compared to selective drugs (promiscuity can be a virtue)
title_short Promiscuous drugs compared to selective drugs (promiscuity can be a virtue)
title_sort promiscuous drugs compared to selective drugs (promiscuity can be a virtue)
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1090568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15854222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-5-3
work_keys_str_mv AT menchersimonk promiscuousdrugscomparedtoselectivedrugspromiscuitycanbeavirtue
AT wanglongg promiscuousdrugscomparedtoselectivedrugspromiscuitycanbeavirtue