Cargando…

Early efficacy of CABG care delivery in a low procedure-volume community hospital: operative and midterm results

BACKGROUND: The Leapfrog Group recommended that coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery should be done at high volume hospitals (>450 per year) without corresponding surgeon-volume criteria. The latter confounds procedure-volume effects substantially, and it is suggested that high surgeon-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papadimos, Thomas J, Habib, Robert H, Zacharias, Anoar, Schwann, Thomas A, Riordan, Christopher J, Durham, Samuel J, Shah, Aamir
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1131908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15865623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-5-10
_version_ 1782123956765982720
author Papadimos, Thomas J
Habib, Robert H
Zacharias, Anoar
Schwann, Thomas A
Riordan, Christopher J
Durham, Samuel J
Shah, Aamir
author_facet Papadimos, Thomas J
Habib, Robert H
Zacharias, Anoar
Schwann, Thomas A
Riordan, Christopher J
Durham, Samuel J
Shah, Aamir
author_sort Papadimos, Thomas J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Leapfrog Group recommended that coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery should be done at high volume hospitals (>450 per year) without corresponding surgeon-volume criteria. The latter confounds procedure-volume effects substantially, and it is suggested that high surgeon-volume (>125 per year) rather than hospital-volume may be a more appropriate indicator of CABG quality. METHODS: We assessed 3-year isolated CABG morbidity and mortality outcomes at a low-volume hospital (LVH: 504 cases) and compared them to the corresponding Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) national data over the same period (2001–2003). All CABGs were performed by 5 high-volume surgeons (161–285 per year). "Best practice" care at LVH – including effective practice guidelines, protocols, data acquisition capabilities, case review process, dedicated facilities and support personnel – were closely modeled after a high-volume hospital served by the same surgeon-team. RESULTS: Operative mortality was similar for LVH and STS (OM: 2.38% vs. 2.53%), and the corresponding LVH observed-to-expected mortality (O/E = 0.81) indicated good quality relative to the STS risk model (O/E<1). Also, these results were consistent irrespective of risk category: O/E was 0, 0.9 and 1.03 for very-low risk (<1%), low risk (1–3%) and moderate-to-high risk category (>3%), respectively. Postoperative leg wound infections, ventilator hours, renal dysfunction (no dialysis), and atrial fibrillation were higher for LVH, but hospital stay was not. The unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival for the LVH cohort was 96%, 94%, and 92% at one, two, and three years, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that high quality CABG care can be achieved at LVH programs if 1) served by high volume surgeons and 2) patient care procedures similar to those of large programs are implemented. This approach may prove a useful paradigm to ensure high quality CABG care and early efficacy at low volume institutions that wish to comply with the Leapfrog standards.
format Text
id pubmed-1131908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-11319082005-05-20 Early efficacy of CABG care delivery in a low procedure-volume community hospital: operative and midterm results Papadimos, Thomas J Habib, Robert H Zacharias, Anoar Schwann, Thomas A Riordan, Christopher J Durham, Samuel J Shah, Aamir BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: The Leapfrog Group recommended that coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery should be done at high volume hospitals (>450 per year) without corresponding surgeon-volume criteria. The latter confounds procedure-volume effects substantially, and it is suggested that high surgeon-volume (>125 per year) rather than hospital-volume may be a more appropriate indicator of CABG quality. METHODS: We assessed 3-year isolated CABG morbidity and mortality outcomes at a low-volume hospital (LVH: 504 cases) and compared them to the corresponding Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) national data over the same period (2001–2003). All CABGs were performed by 5 high-volume surgeons (161–285 per year). "Best practice" care at LVH – including effective practice guidelines, protocols, data acquisition capabilities, case review process, dedicated facilities and support personnel – were closely modeled after a high-volume hospital served by the same surgeon-team. RESULTS: Operative mortality was similar for LVH and STS (OM: 2.38% vs. 2.53%), and the corresponding LVH observed-to-expected mortality (O/E = 0.81) indicated good quality relative to the STS risk model (O/E<1). Also, these results were consistent irrespective of risk category: O/E was 0, 0.9 and 1.03 for very-low risk (<1%), low risk (1–3%) and moderate-to-high risk category (>3%), respectively. Postoperative leg wound infections, ventilator hours, renal dysfunction (no dialysis), and atrial fibrillation were higher for LVH, but hospital stay was not. The unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival for the LVH cohort was 96%, 94%, and 92% at one, two, and three years, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that high quality CABG care can be achieved at LVH programs if 1) served by high volume surgeons and 2) patient care procedures similar to those of large programs are implemented. This approach may prove a useful paradigm to ensure high quality CABG care and early efficacy at low volume institutions that wish to comply with the Leapfrog standards. BioMed Central 2005-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC1131908/ /pubmed/15865623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-5-10 Text en Copyright © 2005 Papadimos et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Papadimos, Thomas J
Habib, Robert H
Zacharias, Anoar
Schwann, Thomas A
Riordan, Christopher J
Durham, Samuel J
Shah, Aamir
Early efficacy of CABG care delivery in a low procedure-volume community hospital: operative and midterm results
title Early efficacy of CABG care delivery in a low procedure-volume community hospital: operative and midterm results
title_full Early efficacy of CABG care delivery in a low procedure-volume community hospital: operative and midterm results
title_fullStr Early efficacy of CABG care delivery in a low procedure-volume community hospital: operative and midterm results
title_full_unstemmed Early efficacy of CABG care delivery in a low procedure-volume community hospital: operative and midterm results
title_short Early efficacy of CABG care delivery in a low procedure-volume community hospital: operative and midterm results
title_sort early efficacy of cabg care delivery in a low procedure-volume community hospital: operative and midterm results
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1131908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15865623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-5-10
work_keys_str_mv AT papadimosthomasj earlyefficacyofcabgcaredeliveryinalowprocedurevolumecommunityhospitaloperativeandmidtermresults
AT habibroberth earlyefficacyofcabgcaredeliveryinalowprocedurevolumecommunityhospitaloperativeandmidtermresults
AT zachariasanoar earlyefficacyofcabgcaredeliveryinalowprocedurevolumecommunityhospitaloperativeandmidtermresults
AT schwannthomasa earlyefficacyofcabgcaredeliveryinalowprocedurevolumecommunityhospitaloperativeandmidtermresults
AT riordanchristopherj earlyefficacyofcabgcaredeliveryinalowprocedurevolumecommunityhospitaloperativeandmidtermresults
AT durhamsamuelj earlyefficacyofcabgcaredeliveryinalowprocedurevolumecommunityhospitaloperativeandmidtermresults
AT shahaamir earlyefficacyofcabgcaredeliveryinalowprocedurevolumecommunityhospitaloperativeandmidtermresults