Cargando…

Parallel organization of contralateral and ipsilateral prefrontal cortical projections in the rhesus monkey

BACKGROUND: The neocortical commissures have a fundamental role in functional integration across the cerebral hemispheres. We investigated whether commissural projections in prefrontal cortices are organized according to the same or different rules as those within the same hemisphere, by quantitativ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barbas, Helen, Hilgetag, Claus C, Saha, Subhash, Dermon, Caterina R, Suski, Joanna L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1134662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15869709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-6-32
_version_ 1782123967294734336
author Barbas, Helen
Hilgetag, Claus C
Saha, Subhash
Dermon, Caterina R
Suski, Joanna L
author_facet Barbas, Helen
Hilgetag, Claus C
Saha, Subhash
Dermon, Caterina R
Suski, Joanna L
author_sort Barbas, Helen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The neocortical commissures have a fundamental role in functional integration across the cerebral hemispheres. We investigated whether commissural projections in prefrontal cortices are organized according to the same or different rules as those within the same hemisphere, by quantitatively comparing density, topography, and laminar origin of contralateral and ipsilateral projections, labeled after unilateral injection of retrograde tracers in prefrontal areas. RESULTS: Commissural projection neurons constituted less than one third of the ipsilateral. Nevertheless, projections from the two hemispheres were strongly correlated in topography and relative density. We investigated to what extent the distribution of contralateral projections depended on: (a) geographic proximity of projection areas to the area homotopic to the injection site; (b) the structural type of the linked areas, based on the number and neuronal density of their layers. Although both measures were good predictors, structural type was a comparatively stronger determinant of the relative distribution and density of projections. Ipsilateral projection neurons were distributed in the superficial (II-III) and deep (V-VI) layers, in proportions that varied across areas. In contrast, contralateral projection neurons were found mostly in the superficial layers, but still showed a gradient in their distribution within cortical layers that correlated significantly with cortical type, but not with geographic proximity to the homotopic area. CONCLUSION: The organization of ipsilateral and contralateral prefrontal projections is similar in topography and relative density, differing only by higher overall density and more widespread laminar origin of ipsilateral than contralateral projections. The projections on both sides are highly correlated with the structural architecture of the linked areas, and their remarkable organization is likely established by punctuated development of distinct cortical types. The preponderance of contralateral projections from layer III may be traced to the late development of the callosal system, whose function may be compromised in diseases that have their root late in ontogeny.
format Text
id pubmed-1134662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-11346622005-05-21 Parallel organization of contralateral and ipsilateral prefrontal cortical projections in the rhesus monkey Barbas, Helen Hilgetag, Claus C Saha, Subhash Dermon, Caterina R Suski, Joanna L BMC Neurosci Research Article BACKGROUND: The neocortical commissures have a fundamental role in functional integration across the cerebral hemispheres. We investigated whether commissural projections in prefrontal cortices are organized according to the same or different rules as those within the same hemisphere, by quantitatively comparing density, topography, and laminar origin of contralateral and ipsilateral projections, labeled after unilateral injection of retrograde tracers in prefrontal areas. RESULTS: Commissural projection neurons constituted less than one third of the ipsilateral. Nevertheless, projections from the two hemispheres were strongly correlated in topography and relative density. We investigated to what extent the distribution of contralateral projections depended on: (a) geographic proximity of projection areas to the area homotopic to the injection site; (b) the structural type of the linked areas, based on the number and neuronal density of their layers. Although both measures were good predictors, structural type was a comparatively stronger determinant of the relative distribution and density of projections. Ipsilateral projection neurons were distributed in the superficial (II-III) and deep (V-VI) layers, in proportions that varied across areas. In contrast, contralateral projection neurons were found mostly in the superficial layers, but still showed a gradient in their distribution within cortical layers that correlated significantly with cortical type, but not with geographic proximity to the homotopic area. CONCLUSION: The organization of ipsilateral and contralateral prefrontal projections is similar in topography and relative density, differing only by higher overall density and more widespread laminar origin of ipsilateral than contralateral projections. The projections on both sides are highly correlated with the structural architecture of the linked areas, and their remarkable organization is likely established by punctuated development of distinct cortical types. The preponderance of contralateral projections from layer III may be traced to the late development of the callosal system, whose function may be compromised in diseases that have their root late in ontogeny. BioMed Central 2005-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC1134662/ /pubmed/15869709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-6-32 Text en Copyright © 2005 Barbas et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
spellingShingle Research Article
Barbas, Helen
Hilgetag, Claus C
Saha, Subhash
Dermon, Caterina R
Suski, Joanna L
Parallel organization of contralateral and ipsilateral prefrontal cortical projections in the rhesus monkey
title Parallel organization of contralateral and ipsilateral prefrontal cortical projections in the rhesus monkey
title_full Parallel organization of contralateral and ipsilateral prefrontal cortical projections in the rhesus monkey
title_fullStr Parallel organization of contralateral and ipsilateral prefrontal cortical projections in the rhesus monkey
title_full_unstemmed Parallel organization of contralateral and ipsilateral prefrontal cortical projections in the rhesus monkey
title_short Parallel organization of contralateral and ipsilateral prefrontal cortical projections in the rhesus monkey
title_sort parallel organization of contralateral and ipsilateral prefrontal cortical projections in the rhesus monkey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1134662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15869709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-6-32
work_keys_str_mv AT barbashelen parallelorganizationofcontralateralandipsilateralprefrontalcorticalprojectionsintherhesusmonkey
AT hilgetagclausc parallelorganizationofcontralateralandipsilateralprefrontalcorticalprojectionsintherhesusmonkey
AT sahasubhash parallelorganizationofcontralateralandipsilateralprefrontalcorticalprojectionsintherhesusmonkey
AT dermoncaterinar parallelorganizationofcontralateralandipsilateralprefrontalcorticalprojectionsintherhesusmonkey
AT suskijoannal parallelorganizationofcontralateralandipsilateralprefrontalcorticalprojectionsintherhesusmonkey