Cargando…
Parallel organization of contralateral and ipsilateral prefrontal cortical projections in the rhesus monkey
BACKGROUND: The neocortical commissures have a fundamental role in functional integration across the cerebral hemispheres. We investigated whether commissural projections in prefrontal cortices are organized according to the same or different rules as those within the same hemisphere, by quantitativ...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1134662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15869709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-6-32 |
_version_ | 1782123967294734336 |
---|---|
author | Barbas, Helen Hilgetag, Claus C Saha, Subhash Dermon, Caterina R Suski, Joanna L |
author_facet | Barbas, Helen Hilgetag, Claus C Saha, Subhash Dermon, Caterina R Suski, Joanna L |
author_sort | Barbas, Helen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The neocortical commissures have a fundamental role in functional integration across the cerebral hemispheres. We investigated whether commissural projections in prefrontal cortices are organized according to the same or different rules as those within the same hemisphere, by quantitatively comparing density, topography, and laminar origin of contralateral and ipsilateral projections, labeled after unilateral injection of retrograde tracers in prefrontal areas. RESULTS: Commissural projection neurons constituted less than one third of the ipsilateral. Nevertheless, projections from the two hemispheres were strongly correlated in topography and relative density. We investigated to what extent the distribution of contralateral projections depended on: (a) geographic proximity of projection areas to the area homotopic to the injection site; (b) the structural type of the linked areas, based on the number and neuronal density of their layers. Although both measures were good predictors, structural type was a comparatively stronger determinant of the relative distribution and density of projections. Ipsilateral projection neurons were distributed in the superficial (II-III) and deep (V-VI) layers, in proportions that varied across areas. In contrast, contralateral projection neurons were found mostly in the superficial layers, but still showed a gradient in their distribution within cortical layers that correlated significantly with cortical type, but not with geographic proximity to the homotopic area. CONCLUSION: The organization of ipsilateral and contralateral prefrontal projections is similar in topography and relative density, differing only by higher overall density and more widespread laminar origin of ipsilateral than contralateral projections. The projections on both sides are highly correlated with the structural architecture of the linked areas, and their remarkable organization is likely established by punctuated development of distinct cortical types. The preponderance of contralateral projections from layer III may be traced to the late development of the callosal system, whose function may be compromised in diseases that have their root late in ontogeny. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1134662 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-11346622005-05-21 Parallel organization of contralateral and ipsilateral prefrontal cortical projections in the rhesus monkey Barbas, Helen Hilgetag, Claus C Saha, Subhash Dermon, Caterina R Suski, Joanna L BMC Neurosci Research Article BACKGROUND: The neocortical commissures have a fundamental role in functional integration across the cerebral hemispheres. We investigated whether commissural projections in prefrontal cortices are organized according to the same or different rules as those within the same hemisphere, by quantitatively comparing density, topography, and laminar origin of contralateral and ipsilateral projections, labeled after unilateral injection of retrograde tracers in prefrontal areas. RESULTS: Commissural projection neurons constituted less than one third of the ipsilateral. Nevertheless, projections from the two hemispheres were strongly correlated in topography and relative density. We investigated to what extent the distribution of contralateral projections depended on: (a) geographic proximity of projection areas to the area homotopic to the injection site; (b) the structural type of the linked areas, based on the number and neuronal density of their layers. Although both measures were good predictors, structural type was a comparatively stronger determinant of the relative distribution and density of projections. Ipsilateral projection neurons were distributed in the superficial (II-III) and deep (V-VI) layers, in proportions that varied across areas. In contrast, contralateral projection neurons were found mostly in the superficial layers, but still showed a gradient in their distribution within cortical layers that correlated significantly with cortical type, but not with geographic proximity to the homotopic area. CONCLUSION: The organization of ipsilateral and contralateral prefrontal projections is similar in topography and relative density, differing only by higher overall density and more widespread laminar origin of ipsilateral than contralateral projections. The projections on both sides are highly correlated with the structural architecture of the linked areas, and their remarkable organization is likely established by punctuated development of distinct cortical types. The preponderance of contralateral projections from layer III may be traced to the late development of the callosal system, whose function may be compromised in diseases that have their root late in ontogeny. BioMed Central 2005-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC1134662/ /pubmed/15869709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-6-32 Text en Copyright © 2005 Barbas et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Barbas, Helen Hilgetag, Claus C Saha, Subhash Dermon, Caterina R Suski, Joanna L Parallel organization of contralateral and ipsilateral prefrontal cortical projections in the rhesus monkey |
title | Parallel organization of contralateral and ipsilateral prefrontal cortical projections in the rhesus monkey |
title_full | Parallel organization of contralateral and ipsilateral prefrontal cortical projections in the rhesus monkey |
title_fullStr | Parallel organization of contralateral and ipsilateral prefrontal cortical projections in the rhesus monkey |
title_full_unstemmed | Parallel organization of contralateral and ipsilateral prefrontal cortical projections in the rhesus monkey |
title_short | Parallel organization of contralateral and ipsilateral prefrontal cortical projections in the rhesus monkey |
title_sort | parallel organization of contralateral and ipsilateral prefrontal cortical projections in the rhesus monkey |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1134662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15869709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-6-32 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barbashelen parallelorganizationofcontralateralandipsilateralprefrontalcorticalprojectionsintherhesusmonkey AT hilgetagclausc parallelorganizationofcontralateralandipsilateralprefrontalcorticalprojectionsintherhesusmonkey AT sahasubhash parallelorganizationofcontralateralandipsilateralprefrontalcorticalprojectionsintherhesusmonkey AT dermoncaterinar parallelorganizationofcontralateralandipsilateralprefrontalcorticalprojectionsintherhesusmonkey AT suskijoannal parallelorganizationofcontralateralandipsilateralprefrontalcorticalprojectionsintherhesusmonkey |