Cargando…

The NMDA antagonist memantine affects training induced motor cortex plasticity – a study using transcranial magnetic stimulation [ISRCTN65784760]

BACKGROUND: Training of a repetitive synchronised movement of two limb muscles leads to short-term plastic changes in the primary motor cortex, which can be assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) mapping. We used this paradigm to study the effect of memantine, a NDMA antagonist, on shor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwenkreis, Peter, Witscher, Katja, Pleger, Burkhard, Malin, Jean-Pierre, Tegenthoff, Martin
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1134663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15890074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-6-35
_version_ 1782123967571558400
author Schwenkreis, Peter
Witscher, Katja
Pleger, Burkhard
Malin, Jean-Pierre
Tegenthoff, Martin
author_facet Schwenkreis, Peter
Witscher, Katja
Pleger, Burkhard
Malin, Jean-Pierre
Tegenthoff, Martin
author_sort Schwenkreis, Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Training of a repetitive synchronised movement of two limb muscles leads to short-term plastic changes in the primary motor cortex, which can be assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) mapping. We used this paradigm to study the effect of memantine, a NDMA antagonist, on short-term motor cortex plasticity in 20 healthy human subjects, and we were especially interested in possible differential effects of different treatment regimens. In a randomised double-blinded cross over study design we therefore administered placebo or memantine either as a single dosage or as an ascending dosage over 8 days. Before and after one hour of motor training, which consisted of a repetitive co-contraction of the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and the deltoid muscle, we assessed the motor output map of the APB muscle by TMS under the different conditions. RESULTS: We found a significant medial shift of the APB motor output map after training in the placebo condition, indicating training-induced short-term plastic changes in the motor cortex. A single dosage of memantine had no significant effect on this training-induced plasticity, whereas memantine administered in an ascending dosage over 8 days was able to block the cortical effect of the motor training. The memantine serum levels after 8 days were markedly higher than the serum levels after a single dosage of memantine, but there was no individual correlation between the shift of the motor output map and the memantine serum level. Besides, repeated administration of a low memantine dosage also led to an effective blockade of training-induced cortical plasticity in spite of serum levels comparable to those reached after single dose administration, suggesting that the repeated administration was more important for the blocking effect than the memantine serum levels. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the NMDA-antagonist memantine is able to block training-induced motor cortex plasticity when administered over 8 days, but not after administration of a single dose. This differential effect might be mainly due to the prolonged action of memantine at the NMDA receptor. These findings must be considered if clinical studies are designed, which aim at evaluating the potency of memantine to prevent "maladaptive" plasticity, e.g. after limb amputation.
format Text
id pubmed-1134663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-11346632005-05-21 The NMDA antagonist memantine affects training induced motor cortex plasticity – a study using transcranial magnetic stimulation [ISRCTN65784760] Schwenkreis, Peter Witscher, Katja Pleger, Burkhard Malin, Jean-Pierre Tegenthoff, Martin BMC Neurosci Research Article BACKGROUND: Training of a repetitive synchronised movement of two limb muscles leads to short-term plastic changes in the primary motor cortex, which can be assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) mapping. We used this paradigm to study the effect of memantine, a NDMA antagonist, on short-term motor cortex plasticity in 20 healthy human subjects, and we were especially interested in possible differential effects of different treatment regimens. In a randomised double-blinded cross over study design we therefore administered placebo or memantine either as a single dosage or as an ascending dosage over 8 days. Before and after one hour of motor training, which consisted of a repetitive co-contraction of the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and the deltoid muscle, we assessed the motor output map of the APB muscle by TMS under the different conditions. RESULTS: We found a significant medial shift of the APB motor output map after training in the placebo condition, indicating training-induced short-term plastic changes in the motor cortex. A single dosage of memantine had no significant effect on this training-induced plasticity, whereas memantine administered in an ascending dosage over 8 days was able to block the cortical effect of the motor training. The memantine serum levels after 8 days were markedly higher than the serum levels after a single dosage of memantine, but there was no individual correlation between the shift of the motor output map and the memantine serum level. Besides, repeated administration of a low memantine dosage also led to an effective blockade of training-induced cortical plasticity in spite of serum levels comparable to those reached after single dose administration, suggesting that the repeated administration was more important for the blocking effect than the memantine serum levels. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the NMDA-antagonist memantine is able to block training-induced motor cortex plasticity when administered over 8 days, but not after administration of a single dose. This differential effect might be mainly due to the prolonged action of memantine at the NMDA receptor. These findings must be considered if clinical studies are designed, which aim at evaluating the potency of memantine to prevent "maladaptive" plasticity, e.g. after limb amputation. BioMed Central 2005-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC1134663/ /pubmed/15890074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-6-35 Text en Copyright © 2005 Schwenkreis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schwenkreis, Peter
Witscher, Katja
Pleger, Burkhard
Malin, Jean-Pierre
Tegenthoff, Martin
The NMDA antagonist memantine affects training induced motor cortex plasticity – a study using transcranial magnetic stimulation [ISRCTN65784760]
title The NMDA antagonist memantine affects training induced motor cortex plasticity – a study using transcranial magnetic stimulation [ISRCTN65784760]
title_full The NMDA antagonist memantine affects training induced motor cortex plasticity – a study using transcranial magnetic stimulation [ISRCTN65784760]
title_fullStr The NMDA antagonist memantine affects training induced motor cortex plasticity – a study using transcranial magnetic stimulation [ISRCTN65784760]
title_full_unstemmed The NMDA antagonist memantine affects training induced motor cortex plasticity – a study using transcranial magnetic stimulation [ISRCTN65784760]
title_short The NMDA antagonist memantine affects training induced motor cortex plasticity – a study using transcranial magnetic stimulation [ISRCTN65784760]
title_sort nmda antagonist memantine affects training induced motor cortex plasticity – a study using transcranial magnetic stimulation [isrctn65784760]
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1134663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15890074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-6-35
work_keys_str_mv AT schwenkreispeter thenmdaantagonistmemantineaffectstraininginducedmotorcortexplasticityastudyusingtranscranialmagneticstimulationisrctn65784760
AT witscherkatja thenmdaantagonistmemantineaffectstraininginducedmotorcortexplasticityastudyusingtranscranialmagneticstimulationisrctn65784760
AT plegerburkhard thenmdaantagonistmemantineaffectstraininginducedmotorcortexplasticityastudyusingtranscranialmagneticstimulationisrctn65784760
AT malinjeanpierre thenmdaantagonistmemantineaffectstraininginducedmotorcortexplasticityastudyusingtranscranialmagneticstimulationisrctn65784760
AT tegenthoffmartin thenmdaantagonistmemantineaffectstraininginducedmotorcortexplasticityastudyusingtranscranialmagneticstimulationisrctn65784760
AT schwenkreispeter nmdaantagonistmemantineaffectstraininginducedmotorcortexplasticityastudyusingtranscranialmagneticstimulationisrctn65784760
AT witscherkatja nmdaantagonistmemantineaffectstraininginducedmotorcortexplasticityastudyusingtranscranialmagneticstimulationisrctn65784760
AT plegerburkhard nmdaantagonistmemantineaffectstraininginducedmotorcortexplasticityastudyusingtranscranialmagneticstimulationisrctn65784760
AT malinjeanpierre nmdaantagonistmemantineaffectstraininginducedmotorcortexplasticityastudyusingtranscranialmagneticstimulationisrctn65784760
AT tegenthoffmartin nmdaantagonistmemantineaffectstraininginducedmotorcortexplasticityastudyusingtranscranialmagneticstimulationisrctn65784760