Cargando…

Blood cultures in ambulatory outpatients

BACKGROUND: Blood cultures are a gold standard specific test for diagnosing many infections. However, the low yield may limit their usefulness, particularly in low-risk populations. This study was conducted to assess the utility of blood cultures drawn from ambulatory outpatients. METHODS: Blood cul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laupland, Kevin B, Church, Deirdre L, Gregson, Daniel B
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1156895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15904503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-5-35
_version_ 1782124328548040704
author Laupland, Kevin B
Church, Deirdre L
Gregson, Daniel B
author_facet Laupland, Kevin B
Church, Deirdre L
Gregson, Daniel B
author_sort Laupland, Kevin B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Blood cultures are a gold standard specific test for diagnosing many infections. However, the low yield may limit their usefulness, particularly in low-risk populations. This study was conducted to assess the utility of blood cultures drawn from ambulatory outpatients. METHODS: Blood cultures drawn at community-based collection sites in the Calgary Health Region (population 1 million) in 2001 and 2002 were included in this study. These patients were analyzed by linkages to acute care health care databases for utilization of acute care facilities within 2 weeks of blood culture draw. RESULTS: 3102 sets of cultures were drawn from 1732 ambulatory outpatients (annual rate = 89.4 per 100,000 population). Significant isolates were identified from 73 (2.4%) sets of cultures from 51 patients, including Escherichia coli in 18 (35%) and seven (14%) each of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Compared to patients with negative cultures, those with positive cultures were older (mean 49.6 vs. 40.1 years, p < 0.01), and more likely to subsequently receive care at a regional emergency department, outpatient antibiotic clinic, or hospital (35/51 vs. 296/1681, p < 0.0001). Of the 331 (19%) patients who received acute care treatment, those with positive cultures presented sooner after community culture draw (median 2 vs. 3 days, p < 0.01) and had longer median treatment duration (6 vs. 2 days, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Blood cultures drawn in outpatient settings are uncommonly positive, but may define patients for increased intensity of therapy. Strategies to reduce utilization without excluding patients with positive cultures need to be developed for this patient population.
format Text
id pubmed-1156895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-11568952005-06-22 Blood cultures in ambulatory outpatients Laupland, Kevin B Church, Deirdre L Gregson, Daniel B BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Blood cultures are a gold standard specific test for diagnosing many infections. However, the low yield may limit their usefulness, particularly in low-risk populations. This study was conducted to assess the utility of blood cultures drawn from ambulatory outpatients. METHODS: Blood cultures drawn at community-based collection sites in the Calgary Health Region (population 1 million) in 2001 and 2002 were included in this study. These patients were analyzed by linkages to acute care health care databases for utilization of acute care facilities within 2 weeks of blood culture draw. RESULTS: 3102 sets of cultures were drawn from 1732 ambulatory outpatients (annual rate = 89.4 per 100,000 population). Significant isolates were identified from 73 (2.4%) sets of cultures from 51 patients, including Escherichia coli in 18 (35%) and seven (14%) each of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Compared to patients with negative cultures, those with positive cultures were older (mean 49.6 vs. 40.1 years, p < 0.01), and more likely to subsequently receive care at a regional emergency department, outpatient antibiotic clinic, or hospital (35/51 vs. 296/1681, p < 0.0001). Of the 331 (19%) patients who received acute care treatment, those with positive cultures presented sooner after community culture draw (median 2 vs. 3 days, p < 0.01) and had longer median treatment duration (6 vs. 2 days, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Blood cultures drawn in outpatient settings are uncommonly positive, but may define patients for increased intensity of therapy. Strategies to reduce utilization without excluding patients with positive cultures need to be developed for this patient population. BioMed Central 2005-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC1156895/ /pubmed/15904503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-5-35 Text en Copyright © 2005 Laupland et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Laupland, Kevin B
Church, Deirdre L
Gregson, Daniel B
Blood cultures in ambulatory outpatients
title Blood cultures in ambulatory outpatients
title_full Blood cultures in ambulatory outpatients
title_fullStr Blood cultures in ambulatory outpatients
title_full_unstemmed Blood cultures in ambulatory outpatients
title_short Blood cultures in ambulatory outpatients
title_sort blood cultures in ambulatory outpatients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1156895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15904503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-5-35
work_keys_str_mv AT lauplandkevinb bloodculturesinambulatoryoutpatients
AT churchdeirdrel bloodculturesinambulatoryoutpatients
AT gregsondanielb bloodculturesinambulatoryoutpatients