Cargando…

Pleasure in decision-making situations

BACKGROUND: This study explores the role of pleasure in decision making. RESULTS: In Experiment 1, 12 subjects were presented with a questionnaire containing 46 items taken from the literature. Twenty-three items described a situation where a decision should be made and ended with a suggested soluti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cabanac, Michel, Guillaume, Jacqueline, Balasko, Marta, Fleury, Adriana
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC116425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12036434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-2-7
_version_ 1782120255464669184
author Cabanac, Michel
Guillaume, Jacqueline
Balasko, Marta
Fleury, Adriana
author_facet Cabanac, Michel
Guillaume, Jacqueline
Balasko, Marta
Fleury, Adriana
author_sort Cabanac, Michel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study explores the role of pleasure in decision making. RESULTS: In Experiment 1, 12 subjects were presented with a questionnaire containing 46 items taken from the literature. Twenty-three items described a situation where a decision should be made and ended with a suggested solution. The other items served as filler items. The subjects were requested not to make a decision but to rate the pleasure or displeasure they experienced when reading the situation described in the item. The subjects' ratings were then compared to the decisions on the same situations made by the other subjects of the studies published by other workers. The ratings of pleasure/displeasure given by our subjects correlated significantly with the choices published by other authors. This result satisfies a necessary condition for pleasure to be the key of the decision making process in theoretical situations. In Experiment 2, a new group of 12 subjects rated their experience of pleasure/displeasure when reading various versions of 50 situations taken from daily life where an ethical decision had to be made (Questionnaire I) including 200 items. This was followed by a multiple-choice test with the 50 situations (Questionnaire II) using the same 200 items and offering the various behaviors. Subjects tended to choose ethical and unethical responses corresponding to their highest pleasure rating within each problem. In all cases the subjects' behavior was higher than chance level, and thus, followed the trend to maximize pleasure. In Experiment 3, 12 subjects reading 50 mathematical short problems followed by correct and incorrect versions of the answer to the problem (Questionnaire III), including 200 items. This was followed by a multiple-choice mathematical test with the 50 problems (Questionnaire IV) using the same 200 items and offering the correct and incorrect answers. In questionnaire IV, subjects tended to choose correct as well as incorrect responses corresponding to their highest hedonic rating within each problem. In all cases the subjects' behavior was higher than chance level, and thus, followed the trend to maximize pleasure. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the three experiments support the hypothesis according to which decisions are made in the hedonic dimension of conscious experience.
format Text
id pubmed-116425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2002
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-1164252002-06-20 Pleasure in decision-making situations Cabanac, Michel Guillaume, Jacqueline Balasko, Marta Fleury, Adriana BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: This study explores the role of pleasure in decision making. RESULTS: In Experiment 1, 12 subjects were presented with a questionnaire containing 46 items taken from the literature. Twenty-three items described a situation where a decision should be made and ended with a suggested solution. The other items served as filler items. The subjects were requested not to make a decision but to rate the pleasure or displeasure they experienced when reading the situation described in the item. The subjects' ratings were then compared to the decisions on the same situations made by the other subjects of the studies published by other workers. The ratings of pleasure/displeasure given by our subjects correlated significantly with the choices published by other authors. This result satisfies a necessary condition for pleasure to be the key of the decision making process in theoretical situations. In Experiment 2, a new group of 12 subjects rated their experience of pleasure/displeasure when reading various versions of 50 situations taken from daily life where an ethical decision had to be made (Questionnaire I) including 200 items. This was followed by a multiple-choice test with the 50 situations (Questionnaire II) using the same 200 items and offering the various behaviors. Subjects tended to choose ethical and unethical responses corresponding to their highest pleasure rating within each problem. In all cases the subjects' behavior was higher than chance level, and thus, followed the trend to maximize pleasure. In Experiment 3, 12 subjects reading 50 mathematical short problems followed by correct and incorrect versions of the answer to the problem (Questionnaire III), including 200 items. This was followed by a multiple-choice mathematical test with the 50 problems (Questionnaire IV) using the same 200 items and offering the correct and incorrect answers. In questionnaire IV, subjects tended to choose correct as well as incorrect responses corresponding to their highest hedonic rating within each problem. In all cases the subjects' behavior was higher than chance level, and thus, followed the trend to maximize pleasure. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the three experiments support the hypothesis according to which decisions are made in the hedonic dimension of conscious experience. BioMed Central 2002-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC116425/ /pubmed/12036434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-2-7 Text en Copyright © 2002 Cabanac et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cabanac, Michel
Guillaume, Jacqueline
Balasko, Marta
Fleury, Adriana
Pleasure in decision-making situations
title Pleasure in decision-making situations
title_full Pleasure in decision-making situations
title_fullStr Pleasure in decision-making situations
title_full_unstemmed Pleasure in decision-making situations
title_short Pleasure in decision-making situations
title_sort pleasure in decision-making situations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC116425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12036434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-2-7
work_keys_str_mv AT cabanacmichel pleasureindecisionmakingsituations
AT guillaumejacqueline pleasureindecisionmakingsituations
AT balaskomarta pleasureindecisionmakingsituations
AT fleuryadriana pleasureindecisionmakingsituations