Cargando…

Use of segmented CT transmission map to avoid metal artifacts in PET images by a PET-CT device

Background: Attenuation correction is generally used to PET images to achieve count rate values independent from tissue densities. The goal of this study was to provide a qualitative comparison of attenuation corrected PET images produced by a PET-CT device (CT, 120 kV, 40 mAs, FOV 600 mm) with and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mirzaei, Siroos, Guerchaft, Michel, Bonnier, Christopher, Knoll, Peter, Doat, Michel, Braeutigam, Peter
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1164418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15953395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2385-5-3
_version_ 1782124411851112448
author Mirzaei, Siroos
Guerchaft, Michel
Bonnier, Christopher
Knoll, Peter
Doat, Michel
Braeutigam, Peter
author_facet Mirzaei, Siroos
Guerchaft, Michel
Bonnier, Christopher
Knoll, Peter
Doat, Michel
Braeutigam, Peter
author_sort Mirzaei, Siroos
collection PubMed
description Background: Attenuation correction is generally used to PET images to achieve count rate values independent from tissue densities. The goal of this study was to provide a qualitative comparison of attenuation corrected PET images produced by a PET-CT device (CT, 120 kV, 40 mAs, FOV 600 mm) with and without segmentation of transmission data (ACseg(+ )and ACseg(-)respectively). Methods: The reconstructed images were compared to attenuation corrected images obtained with a high-energy transmission source (Cs-137 – 662 keV). Thirty oncologic patients were studied using CT and (137)Cs for attenuation correction. All image data were acquired using the Gemini PET-CT scanner (Philips Medical Systems). It is an open PET-CT system that consists of the MX8000 multislice CT and the Allegro PET scanner arranged in a separable configuration. Images with ACseg(+ )and ACseg(- )were analyzed simultaneously in coronal, sagittal and transaxial planes. Two nuclear medicine physicians reviewed the image sets. Results: The image quality in the area of metal implants was better with ACseg(+ )than ACseg(-), without metal induced artifacts generally observed in CT corrected images. Further the images with ACseg(+ )were qualitatively comparable to those obtained with (137)Cs attenuation correction. Conclusions: In case of metal implants, PET studies corrected by CT should preferably use the ACseg(+ )method to avoid the image artifacts.
format Text
id pubmed-1164418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-11644182005-06-29 Use of segmented CT transmission map to avoid metal artifacts in PET images by a PET-CT device Mirzaei, Siroos Guerchaft, Michel Bonnier, Christopher Knoll, Peter Doat, Michel Braeutigam, Peter BMC Nucl Med Technical Advance Background: Attenuation correction is generally used to PET images to achieve count rate values independent from tissue densities. The goal of this study was to provide a qualitative comparison of attenuation corrected PET images produced by a PET-CT device (CT, 120 kV, 40 mAs, FOV 600 mm) with and without segmentation of transmission data (ACseg(+ )and ACseg(-)respectively). Methods: The reconstructed images were compared to attenuation corrected images obtained with a high-energy transmission source (Cs-137 – 662 keV). Thirty oncologic patients were studied using CT and (137)Cs for attenuation correction. All image data were acquired using the Gemini PET-CT scanner (Philips Medical Systems). It is an open PET-CT system that consists of the MX8000 multislice CT and the Allegro PET scanner arranged in a separable configuration. Images with ACseg(+ )and ACseg(- )were analyzed simultaneously in coronal, sagittal and transaxial planes. Two nuclear medicine physicians reviewed the image sets. Results: The image quality in the area of metal implants was better with ACseg(+ )than ACseg(-), without metal induced artifacts generally observed in CT corrected images. Further the images with ACseg(+ )were qualitatively comparable to those obtained with (137)Cs attenuation correction. Conclusions: In case of metal implants, PET studies corrected by CT should preferably use the ACseg(+ )method to avoid the image artifacts. BioMed Central 2005-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC1164418/ /pubmed/15953395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2385-5-3 Text en Copyright © 2005 Mirzaei et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Mirzaei, Siroos
Guerchaft, Michel
Bonnier, Christopher
Knoll, Peter
Doat, Michel
Braeutigam, Peter
Use of segmented CT transmission map to avoid metal artifacts in PET images by a PET-CT device
title Use of segmented CT transmission map to avoid metal artifacts in PET images by a PET-CT device
title_full Use of segmented CT transmission map to avoid metal artifacts in PET images by a PET-CT device
title_fullStr Use of segmented CT transmission map to avoid metal artifacts in PET images by a PET-CT device
title_full_unstemmed Use of segmented CT transmission map to avoid metal artifacts in PET images by a PET-CT device
title_short Use of segmented CT transmission map to avoid metal artifacts in PET images by a PET-CT device
title_sort use of segmented ct transmission map to avoid metal artifacts in pet images by a pet-ct device
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1164418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15953395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2385-5-3
work_keys_str_mv AT mirzaeisiroos useofsegmentedcttransmissionmaptoavoidmetalartifactsinpetimagesbyapetctdevice
AT guerchaftmichel useofsegmentedcttransmissionmaptoavoidmetalartifactsinpetimagesbyapetctdevice
AT bonnierchristopher useofsegmentedcttransmissionmaptoavoidmetalartifactsinpetimagesbyapetctdevice
AT knollpeter useofsegmentedcttransmissionmaptoavoidmetalartifactsinpetimagesbyapetctdevice
AT doatmichel useofsegmentedcttransmissionmaptoavoidmetalartifactsinpetimagesbyapetctdevice
AT braeutigampeter useofsegmentedcttransmissionmaptoavoidmetalartifactsinpetimagesbyapetctdevice