Cargando…

Bupivacaine versus lidocaine analgesia for neonatal circumcision

BACKGROUND: Analgesia for neonatal circumcision was recently advocated for every male infant, and its use is considered essential by the American Academy of Pediatrics. We compared the post-operative analgesic quality of bupivacaine to that of lidocaine for achieving dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stolik-Dollberg, Orit C, Dollberg, Shaul
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1164419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15907216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-5-12
_version_ 1782124412133179392
author Stolik-Dollberg, Orit C
Dollberg, Shaul
author_facet Stolik-Dollberg, Orit C
Dollberg, Shaul
author_sort Stolik-Dollberg, Orit C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Analgesia for neonatal circumcision was recently advocated for every male infant, and its use is considered essential by the American Academy of Pediatrics. We compared the post-operative analgesic quality of bupivacaine to that of lidocaine for achieving dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) when performing neonatal circumcision. METHODS: Data were obtained from 38 neonates following neonatal circumcision. The infants had received DPNB analgesia with either lidocaine or bupivacaine. The outcome variable was the administration by the parents of acetaminophen during the ensuing 24 hours. RESULTS: Seventeen infants received lidocaine and 19 received bupivacaine DPNB. Ten infants in the lidocaine group (59%) were given acetaminophen following circumcision compared to only 3 (16%) in the bupivacaine group (P < 0.01). Regression analysis showed that the only significant variable associated with the need for acetaminophen was the use of lidocaine (R(2 )= 20.6; P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: DPNB with bupivacaine for neonatal circumcision apparently confers better analgesia than lidocaine as judged by the requirement of acetaminophen over the ensuing 24-hour period.
format Text
id pubmed-1164419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-11644192005-06-29 Bupivacaine versus lidocaine analgesia for neonatal circumcision Stolik-Dollberg, Orit C Dollberg, Shaul BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Analgesia for neonatal circumcision was recently advocated for every male infant, and its use is considered essential by the American Academy of Pediatrics. We compared the post-operative analgesic quality of bupivacaine to that of lidocaine for achieving dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) when performing neonatal circumcision. METHODS: Data were obtained from 38 neonates following neonatal circumcision. The infants had received DPNB analgesia with either lidocaine or bupivacaine. The outcome variable was the administration by the parents of acetaminophen during the ensuing 24 hours. RESULTS: Seventeen infants received lidocaine and 19 received bupivacaine DPNB. Ten infants in the lidocaine group (59%) were given acetaminophen following circumcision compared to only 3 (16%) in the bupivacaine group (P < 0.01). Regression analysis showed that the only significant variable associated with the need for acetaminophen was the use of lidocaine (R(2 )= 20.6; P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: DPNB with bupivacaine for neonatal circumcision apparently confers better analgesia than lidocaine as judged by the requirement of acetaminophen over the ensuing 24-hour period. BioMed Central 2005-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC1164419/ /pubmed/15907216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-5-12 Text en Copyright © 2005 Stolik-Dollberg and Dollberg; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stolik-Dollberg, Orit C
Dollberg, Shaul
Bupivacaine versus lidocaine analgesia for neonatal circumcision
title Bupivacaine versus lidocaine analgesia for neonatal circumcision
title_full Bupivacaine versus lidocaine analgesia for neonatal circumcision
title_fullStr Bupivacaine versus lidocaine analgesia for neonatal circumcision
title_full_unstemmed Bupivacaine versus lidocaine analgesia for neonatal circumcision
title_short Bupivacaine versus lidocaine analgesia for neonatal circumcision
title_sort bupivacaine versus lidocaine analgesia for neonatal circumcision
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1164419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15907216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-5-12
work_keys_str_mv AT stolikdollbergoritc bupivacaineversuslidocaineanalgesiaforneonatalcircumcision
AT dollbergshaul bupivacaineversuslidocaineanalgesiaforneonatalcircumcision