Cargando…
Bupivacaine versus lidocaine analgesia for neonatal circumcision
BACKGROUND: Analgesia for neonatal circumcision was recently advocated for every male infant, and its use is considered essential by the American Academy of Pediatrics. We compared the post-operative analgesic quality of bupivacaine to that of lidocaine for achieving dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB)...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1164419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15907216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-5-12 |
_version_ | 1782124412133179392 |
---|---|
author | Stolik-Dollberg, Orit C Dollberg, Shaul |
author_facet | Stolik-Dollberg, Orit C Dollberg, Shaul |
author_sort | Stolik-Dollberg, Orit C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Analgesia for neonatal circumcision was recently advocated for every male infant, and its use is considered essential by the American Academy of Pediatrics. We compared the post-operative analgesic quality of bupivacaine to that of lidocaine for achieving dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) when performing neonatal circumcision. METHODS: Data were obtained from 38 neonates following neonatal circumcision. The infants had received DPNB analgesia with either lidocaine or bupivacaine. The outcome variable was the administration by the parents of acetaminophen during the ensuing 24 hours. RESULTS: Seventeen infants received lidocaine and 19 received bupivacaine DPNB. Ten infants in the lidocaine group (59%) were given acetaminophen following circumcision compared to only 3 (16%) in the bupivacaine group (P < 0.01). Regression analysis showed that the only significant variable associated with the need for acetaminophen was the use of lidocaine (R(2 )= 20.6; P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: DPNB with bupivacaine for neonatal circumcision apparently confers better analgesia than lidocaine as judged by the requirement of acetaminophen over the ensuing 24-hour period. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1164419 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-11644192005-06-29 Bupivacaine versus lidocaine analgesia for neonatal circumcision Stolik-Dollberg, Orit C Dollberg, Shaul BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Analgesia for neonatal circumcision was recently advocated for every male infant, and its use is considered essential by the American Academy of Pediatrics. We compared the post-operative analgesic quality of bupivacaine to that of lidocaine for achieving dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) when performing neonatal circumcision. METHODS: Data were obtained from 38 neonates following neonatal circumcision. The infants had received DPNB analgesia with either lidocaine or bupivacaine. The outcome variable was the administration by the parents of acetaminophen during the ensuing 24 hours. RESULTS: Seventeen infants received lidocaine and 19 received bupivacaine DPNB. Ten infants in the lidocaine group (59%) were given acetaminophen following circumcision compared to only 3 (16%) in the bupivacaine group (P < 0.01). Regression analysis showed that the only significant variable associated with the need for acetaminophen was the use of lidocaine (R(2 )= 20.6; P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: DPNB with bupivacaine for neonatal circumcision apparently confers better analgesia than lidocaine as judged by the requirement of acetaminophen over the ensuing 24-hour period. BioMed Central 2005-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC1164419/ /pubmed/15907216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-5-12 Text en Copyright © 2005 Stolik-Dollberg and Dollberg; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Stolik-Dollberg, Orit C Dollberg, Shaul Bupivacaine versus lidocaine analgesia for neonatal circumcision |
title | Bupivacaine versus lidocaine analgesia for neonatal circumcision |
title_full | Bupivacaine versus lidocaine analgesia for neonatal circumcision |
title_fullStr | Bupivacaine versus lidocaine analgesia for neonatal circumcision |
title_full_unstemmed | Bupivacaine versus lidocaine analgesia for neonatal circumcision |
title_short | Bupivacaine versus lidocaine analgesia for neonatal circumcision |
title_sort | bupivacaine versus lidocaine analgesia for neonatal circumcision |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1164419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15907216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-5-12 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stolikdollbergoritc bupivacaineversuslidocaineanalgesiaforneonatalcircumcision AT dollbergshaul bupivacaineversuslidocaineanalgesiaforneonatalcircumcision |