Cargando…
Losartan and diabetic nephropathy: commentaries on the RENAAL study
The RENAAL (Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan) study is a multinational, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial which was recently published. It was aimed to evaluate the effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker losartan in patients with diabet...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2002
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC116616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12119058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-1-2 |
_version_ | 1782120267392221184 |
---|---|
author | Fisman, Enrique Z Tenenbaum, Alexander Motro, Michael |
author_facet | Fisman, Enrique Z Tenenbaum, Alexander Motro, Michael |
author_sort | Fisman, Enrique Z |
collection | PubMed |
description | The RENAAL (Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan) study is a multinational, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial which was recently published. It was aimed to evaluate the effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker losartan in patients with diabetic nephropathy. The primary efficacy measure was the time to the first event of the composite end point of a doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease, or death. The conclusion was that losartan led to significant improvement in renal outcomes, that was beyond that attributable to blood pressure control in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. The perusal of the report raises concern, regarding to both the patient population as well as the outcome measures. At randomization, the placebo group included more patients with angina, myocardial infarction and lipid disorders than the losartan group. Information on glucose metabolism was disregarded, and data on antihyperglycemic therapy – which may have undesirable influences on cardiac performance – were not included in a multivariate analysis. In addition, only data on first hospitalization were reported, whilst information on total specific-cause hospitalizations was disregarded, thus potentially masking further unfavorable events. Furthermore, creatinine seems not to be a reliable surrogate end point. Based on its mechanism of action, losartan may possess favorable renoprotective properties. However, due to the methodological flaws and the incomplete data in the RENAAL study, the question of the effectiveness and safety of this drug in diabetic nephropathy remains yet unanswered. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-116616 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2002 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-1166162002-06-28 Losartan and diabetic nephropathy: commentaries on the RENAAL study Fisman, Enrique Z Tenenbaum, Alexander Motro, Michael Cardiovasc Diabetol Commentary The RENAAL (Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan) study is a multinational, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial which was recently published. It was aimed to evaluate the effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker losartan in patients with diabetic nephropathy. The primary efficacy measure was the time to the first event of the composite end point of a doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease, or death. The conclusion was that losartan led to significant improvement in renal outcomes, that was beyond that attributable to blood pressure control in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. The perusal of the report raises concern, regarding to both the patient population as well as the outcome measures. At randomization, the placebo group included more patients with angina, myocardial infarction and lipid disorders than the losartan group. Information on glucose metabolism was disregarded, and data on antihyperglycemic therapy – which may have undesirable influences on cardiac performance – were not included in a multivariate analysis. In addition, only data on first hospitalization were reported, whilst information on total specific-cause hospitalizations was disregarded, thus potentially masking further unfavorable events. Furthermore, creatinine seems not to be a reliable surrogate end point. Based on its mechanism of action, losartan may possess favorable renoprotective properties. However, due to the methodological flaws and the incomplete data in the RENAAL study, the question of the effectiveness and safety of this drug in diabetic nephropathy remains yet unanswered. BioMed Central 2002-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC116616/ /pubmed/12119058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-1-2 Text en Copyright © 2002 Fisman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Fisman, Enrique Z Tenenbaum, Alexander Motro, Michael Losartan and diabetic nephropathy: commentaries on the RENAAL study |
title | Losartan and diabetic nephropathy: commentaries on the RENAAL study |
title_full | Losartan and diabetic nephropathy: commentaries on the RENAAL study |
title_fullStr | Losartan and diabetic nephropathy: commentaries on the RENAAL study |
title_full_unstemmed | Losartan and diabetic nephropathy: commentaries on the RENAAL study |
title_short | Losartan and diabetic nephropathy: commentaries on the RENAAL study |
title_sort | losartan and diabetic nephropathy: commentaries on the renaal study |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC116616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12119058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-1-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fismanenriquez losartananddiabeticnephropathycommentariesontherenaalstudy AT tenenbaumalexander losartananddiabeticnephropathycommentariesontherenaalstudy AT motromichael losartananddiabeticnephropathycommentariesontherenaalstudy |