Cargando…

Losartan and diabetic nephropathy: commentaries on the RENAAL study

The RENAAL (Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan) study is a multinational, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial which was recently published. It was aimed to evaluate the effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker losartan in patients with diabet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fisman, Enrique Z, Tenenbaum, Alexander, Motro, Michael
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC116616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12119058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-1-2
_version_ 1782120267392221184
author Fisman, Enrique Z
Tenenbaum, Alexander
Motro, Michael
author_facet Fisman, Enrique Z
Tenenbaum, Alexander
Motro, Michael
author_sort Fisman, Enrique Z
collection PubMed
description The RENAAL (Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan) study is a multinational, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial which was recently published. It was aimed to evaluate the effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker losartan in patients with diabetic nephropathy. The primary efficacy measure was the time to the first event of the composite end point of a doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease, or death. The conclusion was that losartan led to significant improvement in renal outcomes, that was beyond that attributable to blood pressure control in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. The perusal of the report raises concern, regarding to both the patient population as well as the outcome measures. At randomization, the placebo group included more patients with angina, myocardial infarction and lipid disorders than the losartan group. Information on glucose metabolism was disregarded, and data on antihyperglycemic therapy – which may have undesirable influences on cardiac performance – were not included in a multivariate analysis. In addition, only data on first hospitalization were reported, whilst information on total specific-cause hospitalizations was disregarded, thus potentially masking further unfavorable events. Furthermore, creatinine seems not to be a reliable surrogate end point. Based on its mechanism of action, losartan may possess favorable renoprotective properties. However, due to the methodological flaws and the incomplete data in the RENAAL study, the question of the effectiveness and safety of this drug in diabetic nephropathy remains yet unanswered.
format Text
id pubmed-116616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2002
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-1166162002-06-28 Losartan and diabetic nephropathy: commentaries on the RENAAL study Fisman, Enrique Z Tenenbaum, Alexander Motro, Michael Cardiovasc Diabetol Commentary The RENAAL (Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan) study is a multinational, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial which was recently published. It was aimed to evaluate the effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker losartan in patients with diabetic nephropathy. The primary efficacy measure was the time to the first event of the composite end point of a doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease, or death. The conclusion was that losartan led to significant improvement in renal outcomes, that was beyond that attributable to blood pressure control in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. The perusal of the report raises concern, regarding to both the patient population as well as the outcome measures. At randomization, the placebo group included more patients with angina, myocardial infarction and lipid disorders than the losartan group. Information on glucose metabolism was disregarded, and data on antihyperglycemic therapy – which may have undesirable influences on cardiac performance – were not included in a multivariate analysis. In addition, only data on first hospitalization were reported, whilst information on total specific-cause hospitalizations was disregarded, thus potentially masking further unfavorable events. Furthermore, creatinine seems not to be a reliable surrogate end point. Based on its mechanism of action, losartan may possess favorable renoprotective properties. However, due to the methodological flaws and the incomplete data in the RENAAL study, the question of the effectiveness and safety of this drug in diabetic nephropathy remains yet unanswered. BioMed Central 2002-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC116616/ /pubmed/12119058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-1-2 Text en Copyright © 2002 Fisman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Commentary
Fisman, Enrique Z
Tenenbaum, Alexander
Motro, Michael
Losartan and diabetic nephropathy: commentaries on the RENAAL study
title Losartan and diabetic nephropathy: commentaries on the RENAAL study
title_full Losartan and diabetic nephropathy: commentaries on the RENAAL study
title_fullStr Losartan and diabetic nephropathy: commentaries on the RENAAL study
title_full_unstemmed Losartan and diabetic nephropathy: commentaries on the RENAAL study
title_short Losartan and diabetic nephropathy: commentaries on the RENAAL study
title_sort losartan and diabetic nephropathy: commentaries on the renaal study
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC116616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12119058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-1-2
work_keys_str_mv AT fismanenriquez losartananddiabeticnephropathycommentariesontherenaalstudy
AT tenenbaumalexander losartananddiabeticnephropathycommentariesontherenaalstudy
AT motromichael losartananddiabeticnephropathycommentariesontherenaalstudy