Cargando…
Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines
BACKGROUND: Although guidelines for critical appraisal of diagnostic research and meta-analyses have already been published, these may be difficult to understand for clinical researchers or do not provide enough detailed information. METHODS: Development of guidelines based on a systematic review of...
Autores principales: | Devillé, Walter L, Buntinx, Frank, Bouter, Lex M, Montori, Victor M, de Vet, Henrica CW, van der Windt, Danielle AWM, Bezemer, P Dick |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2002
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC117243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12097142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-2-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The urine dipstick test useful to rule out infections. A meta-analysis of the accuracy
por: Devillé, Walter LJM, et al.
Publicado: (2004) -
Reproducibility of the STARD checklist: an instrument to assess the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies
por: Smidt, Nynke, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Prediction of persistent shoulder pain in general practice: Comparing clinical consensus from a Delphi procedure with a statistical scoring system
por: Vergouw, David, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Reproducibility of cervical range of motion in patients with neck pain
por: Hoving, Jan Lucas, et al.
Publicado: (2005) -
Splinting or surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome? Design of a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN18853827]
por: Gerritsen, Annette AM, et al.
Publicado: (2001)