Cargando…

Physicians perceived usefulness of high-cost diagnostic imaging studies: results of a referral study in a German medical quality network

BACKGROUND: Medical and technological progress has led to increased numbers of diagnostic tests, some of them inducing high financial costs. In Germany, high-cost diagnostic imaging is performed by a medical specialist after referral by a general practitioner (GP) or specialist in primary care. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schneider, Antonius, Rosemann, Thomas, Wensing, Michel, Szecsenyi, Joachim
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1174867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15941483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-6-22
_version_ 1782124469793325056
author Schneider, Antonius
Rosemann, Thomas
Wensing, Michel
Szecsenyi, Joachim
author_facet Schneider, Antonius
Rosemann, Thomas
Wensing, Michel
Szecsenyi, Joachim
author_sort Schneider, Antonius
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medical and technological progress has led to increased numbers of diagnostic tests, some of them inducing high financial costs. In Germany, high-cost diagnostic imaging is performed by a medical specialist after referral by a general practitioner (GP) or specialist in primary care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the physicians' perceived usefulness of high-cost diagnostic imaging in patients with different clinical conditions. METHODS: Thirty-four GPs, one neurologist and one orthopaedic specialist in ambulatory care from a Medical Quality Network documented 234 referrals concerning 97 MRIs, 96 CTs-scan and 41 intracardiac catheters in a three month period. After having received the test results, they indicated if these were useful for diagnosis and treatment of the patient. RESULTS: The physicians' perceived usefulness of tests was lowest in suspected cerebral disease (40% of test results were seen as useful), cervical spine problems (64%) and unexplained abdominal complaints (67%). The perceived usefulness was highest in musculoskeletal symptoms (94%) and second best in cardiological diseases (82%). CONCLUSION: The perceived usefulness of high-cost diagnostic imaging was lower in unexplained complaints than in specific diseases. Interventions to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of test ordering should focus on clinical decision making in conditions where GPs perceived low usefulness.
format Text
id pubmed-1174867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-11748672005-07-09 Physicians perceived usefulness of high-cost diagnostic imaging studies: results of a referral study in a German medical quality network Schneider, Antonius Rosemann, Thomas Wensing, Michel Szecsenyi, Joachim BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Medical and technological progress has led to increased numbers of diagnostic tests, some of them inducing high financial costs. In Germany, high-cost diagnostic imaging is performed by a medical specialist after referral by a general practitioner (GP) or specialist in primary care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the physicians' perceived usefulness of high-cost diagnostic imaging in patients with different clinical conditions. METHODS: Thirty-four GPs, one neurologist and one orthopaedic specialist in ambulatory care from a Medical Quality Network documented 234 referrals concerning 97 MRIs, 96 CTs-scan and 41 intracardiac catheters in a three month period. After having received the test results, they indicated if these were useful for diagnosis and treatment of the patient. RESULTS: The physicians' perceived usefulness of tests was lowest in suspected cerebral disease (40% of test results were seen as useful), cervical spine problems (64%) and unexplained abdominal complaints (67%). The perceived usefulness was highest in musculoskeletal symptoms (94%) and second best in cardiological diseases (82%). CONCLUSION: The perceived usefulness of high-cost diagnostic imaging was lower in unexplained complaints than in specific diseases. Interventions to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of test ordering should focus on clinical decision making in conditions where GPs perceived low usefulness. BioMed Central 2005-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC1174867/ /pubmed/15941483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-6-22 Text en Copyright © 2005 Schneider et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schneider, Antonius
Rosemann, Thomas
Wensing, Michel
Szecsenyi, Joachim
Physicians perceived usefulness of high-cost diagnostic imaging studies: results of a referral study in a German medical quality network
title Physicians perceived usefulness of high-cost diagnostic imaging studies: results of a referral study in a German medical quality network
title_full Physicians perceived usefulness of high-cost diagnostic imaging studies: results of a referral study in a German medical quality network
title_fullStr Physicians perceived usefulness of high-cost diagnostic imaging studies: results of a referral study in a German medical quality network
title_full_unstemmed Physicians perceived usefulness of high-cost diagnostic imaging studies: results of a referral study in a German medical quality network
title_short Physicians perceived usefulness of high-cost diagnostic imaging studies: results of a referral study in a German medical quality network
title_sort physicians perceived usefulness of high-cost diagnostic imaging studies: results of a referral study in a german medical quality network
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1174867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15941483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-6-22
work_keys_str_mv AT schneiderantonius physiciansperceivedusefulnessofhighcostdiagnosticimagingstudiesresultsofareferralstudyinagermanmedicalqualitynetwork
AT rosemannthomas physiciansperceivedusefulnessofhighcostdiagnosticimagingstudiesresultsofareferralstudyinagermanmedicalqualitynetwork
AT wensingmichel physiciansperceivedusefulnessofhighcostdiagnosticimagingstudiesresultsofareferralstudyinagermanmedicalqualitynetwork
AT szecsenyijoachim physiciansperceivedusefulnessofhighcostdiagnosticimagingstudiesresultsofareferralstudyinagermanmedicalqualitynetwork