Cargando…

Volume-based referral for cardiovascular procedures in the United States: a cross-sectional regression analysis

BACKGROUND: We sought to estimate the numbers of patients affected and deaths avoided by adopting the Leapfrog Group's recommended hospital procedure volume minimums for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In addition to hospital risk-adjust...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Epstein, Andrew J, Rathore, Saif S, Krumholz, Harlan M, Volpp, Kevin GM
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1175086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15935099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-5-42
_version_ 1782124508357853184
author Epstein, Andrew J
Rathore, Saif S
Krumholz, Harlan M
Volpp, Kevin GM
author_facet Epstein, Andrew J
Rathore, Saif S
Krumholz, Harlan M
Volpp, Kevin GM
author_sort Epstein, Andrew J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We sought to estimate the numbers of patients affected and deaths avoided by adopting the Leapfrog Group's recommended hospital procedure volume minimums for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In addition to hospital risk-adjusted mortality standards, the Leapfrog Group recommends annual hospital procedure minimums of 450 for CABG and 400 for PCI to reduce procedure-associated mortality. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a national hospital discharge database to evaluate in-hospital mortality among patients who underwent PCI (n = 2,500,796) or CABG (n = 1,496,937) between 1998 and 2001. We calculated the number of patients treated at low volume hospitals and simulated the number of deaths potentially averted by moving all patients to high volume hospitals under best-case conditions (i.e., assuming the full volume-associated reduction in mortality and the capacity to move all patients to high volume hospitals with no related harms). RESULTS: Multivariate adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality were higher for patients treated in low volume hospitals compared with high volume hospitals for CABG (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.10–1.24) and PCI (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.05–1.20). A policy of hospital volume minimums would have required moving 143,687 patients for CABG and 87,661 patients for PCI from low volume to high volume hospitals annually and prevented an estimated 619 CABG deaths and 109 PCI deaths. Thus, preventing a single death would have required moving 232 CABG patients or 805 PCI patients from low volume to high volume hospitals. CONCLUSION: Recommended hospital CABG and PCI volume minimums would prevent 728 deaths annually in the United States, fewer than previously estimated. It is unclear whether a policy requiring the movement of large numbers of patients to avoid relatively few deaths is feasible or effective.
format Text
id pubmed-1175086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-11750862005-07-14 Volume-based referral for cardiovascular procedures in the United States: a cross-sectional regression analysis Epstein, Andrew J Rathore, Saif S Krumholz, Harlan M Volpp, Kevin GM BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: We sought to estimate the numbers of patients affected and deaths avoided by adopting the Leapfrog Group's recommended hospital procedure volume minimums for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In addition to hospital risk-adjusted mortality standards, the Leapfrog Group recommends annual hospital procedure minimums of 450 for CABG and 400 for PCI to reduce procedure-associated mortality. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a national hospital discharge database to evaluate in-hospital mortality among patients who underwent PCI (n = 2,500,796) or CABG (n = 1,496,937) between 1998 and 2001. We calculated the number of patients treated at low volume hospitals and simulated the number of deaths potentially averted by moving all patients to high volume hospitals under best-case conditions (i.e., assuming the full volume-associated reduction in mortality and the capacity to move all patients to high volume hospitals with no related harms). RESULTS: Multivariate adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality were higher for patients treated in low volume hospitals compared with high volume hospitals for CABG (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.10–1.24) and PCI (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.05–1.20). A policy of hospital volume minimums would have required moving 143,687 patients for CABG and 87,661 patients for PCI from low volume to high volume hospitals annually and prevented an estimated 619 CABG deaths and 109 PCI deaths. Thus, preventing a single death would have required moving 232 CABG patients or 805 PCI patients from low volume to high volume hospitals. CONCLUSION: Recommended hospital CABG and PCI volume minimums would prevent 728 deaths annually in the United States, fewer than previously estimated. It is unclear whether a policy requiring the movement of large numbers of patients to avoid relatively few deaths is feasible or effective. BioMed Central 2005-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC1175086/ /pubmed/15935099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-5-42 Text en Copyright © 2005 Epstein et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Epstein, Andrew J
Rathore, Saif S
Krumholz, Harlan M
Volpp, Kevin GM
Volume-based referral for cardiovascular procedures in the United States: a cross-sectional regression analysis
title Volume-based referral for cardiovascular procedures in the United States: a cross-sectional regression analysis
title_full Volume-based referral for cardiovascular procedures in the United States: a cross-sectional regression analysis
title_fullStr Volume-based referral for cardiovascular procedures in the United States: a cross-sectional regression analysis
title_full_unstemmed Volume-based referral for cardiovascular procedures in the United States: a cross-sectional regression analysis
title_short Volume-based referral for cardiovascular procedures in the United States: a cross-sectional regression analysis
title_sort volume-based referral for cardiovascular procedures in the united states: a cross-sectional regression analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1175086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15935099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-5-42
work_keys_str_mv AT epsteinandrewj volumebasedreferralforcardiovascularproceduresintheunitedstatesacrosssectionalregressionanalysis
AT rathoresaifs volumebasedreferralforcardiovascularproceduresintheunitedstatesacrosssectionalregressionanalysis
AT krumholzharlanm volumebasedreferralforcardiovascularproceduresintheunitedstatesacrosssectionalregressionanalysis
AT volppkevingm volumebasedreferralforcardiovascularproceduresintheunitedstatesacrosssectionalregressionanalysis