Cargando…
Finger extensor variability in TMS parameters among chronic stroke patients
BACKGROUND: This study determined the reliability of topographic motor cortical maps and MEP characteristics in the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) evoked by single-pulse TMS among patients with chronic stroke. METHODS: Each of ten patients was studied on three occasions. Measures included locatio...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1175099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15927075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-2-10 |
_version_ | 1782124511608438784 |
---|---|
author | Butler, Andrew J Kahn, Shannon Wolf, Steven L Weiss, Paul |
author_facet | Butler, Andrew J Kahn, Shannon Wolf, Steven L Weiss, Paul |
author_sort | Butler, Andrew J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study determined the reliability of topographic motor cortical maps and MEP characteristics in the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) evoked by single-pulse TMS among patients with chronic stroke. METHODS: Each of ten patients was studied on three occasions. Measures included location of the EDC hotspot and center of gravity (COG), threshold of activation and average amplitude of the hotspot, number of active sites, map volume, and recruitment curve (RC) slope. RESULTS: Consistent intrahemispheric measurements were obtained for the three TMS mapping sessions for all measured variables. No statistically significant difference was observed between hemispheres for the number of active sites, COG distance or the RC slope. The magnitude and range of COG movement between sessions were similar to those reported previously with this muscle in able-bodied individuals. The average COG movement over three sessions in both hemispheres was 0.90 cm. The average COG movement in the affected hemisphere was 1.13 (± 0.08) cm, and 0.68 (± 0.04) cm) for the less affected hemisphere. However, significant interhemispheric variability was seen for the average MEP amplitude, normalized map volume, and resting motor threshold. CONCLUSION: The physiologic variability in some TMS measurements of EDC suggest that interpretation of TMS mapping data derived from hemiparetic patients in the chronic stage following stroke should be undertaken cautiously. Irrespective of the muscle, potential causes of variability should be resolved to accurately assess the impact of pharmacological or physical interventions on cortical organization as measured by TMS among patients with stroke. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1175099 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-11750992005-07-14 Finger extensor variability in TMS parameters among chronic stroke patients Butler, Andrew J Kahn, Shannon Wolf, Steven L Weiss, Paul J Neuroengineering Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: This study determined the reliability of topographic motor cortical maps and MEP characteristics in the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) evoked by single-pulse TMS among patients with chronic stroke. METHODS: Each of ten patients was studied on three occasions. Measures included location of the EDC hotspot and center of gravity (COG), threshold of activation and average amplitude of the hotspot, number of active sites, map volume, and recruitment curve (RC) slope. RESULTS: Consistent intrahemispheric measurements were obtained for the three TMS mapping sessions for all measured variables. No statistically significant difference was observed between hemispheres for the number of active sites, COG distance or the RC slope. The magnitude and range of COG movement between sessions were similar to those reported previously with this muscle in able-bodied individuals. The average COG movement over three sessions in both hemispheres was 0.90 cm. The average COG movement in the affected hemisphere was 1.13 (± 0.08) cm, and 0.68 (± 0.04) cm) for the less affected hemisphere. However, significant interhemispheric variability was seen for the average MEP amplitude, normalized map volume, and resting motor threshold. CONCLUSION: The physiologic variability in some TMS measurements of EDC suggest that interpretation of TMS mapping data derived from hemiparetic patients in the chronic stage following stroke should be undertaken cautiously. Irrespective of the muscle, potential causes of variability should be resolved to accurately assess the impact of pharmacological or physical interventions on cortical organization as measured by TMS among patients with stroke. BioMed Central 2005-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC1175099/ /pubmed/15927075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-2-10 Text en Copyright © 2005 Butler et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Butler, Andrew J Kahn, Shannon Wolf, Steven L Weiss, Paul Finger extensor variability in TMS parameters among chronic stroke patients |
title | Finger extensor variability in TMS parameters among chronic stroke patients |
title_full | Finger extensor variability in TMS parameters among chronic stroke patients |
title_fullStr | Finger extensor variability in TMS parameters among chronic stroke patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Finger extensor variability in TMS parameters among chronic stroke patients |
title_short | Finger extensor variability in TMS parameters among chronic stroke patients |
title_sort | finger extensor variability in tms parameters among chronic stroke patients |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1175099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15927075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-2-10 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT butlerandrewj fingerextensorvariabilityintmsparametersamongchronicstrokepatients AT kahnshannon fingerextensorvariabilityintmsparametersamongchronicstrokepatients AT wolfstevenl fingerextensorvariabilityintmsparametersamongchronicstrokepatients AT weisspaul fingerextensorvariabilityintmsparametersamongchronicstrokepatients |