Cargando…

Finger extensor variability in TMS parameters among chronic stroke patients

BACKGROUND: This study determined the reliability of topographic motor cortical maps and MEP characteristics in the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) evoked by single-pulse TMS among patients with chronic stroke. METHODS: Each of ten patients was studied on three occasions. Measures included locatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Butler, Andrew J, Kahn, Shannon, Wolf, Steven L, Weiss, Paul
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1175099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15927075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-2-10
_version_ 1782124511608438784
author Butler, Andrew J
Kahn, Shannon
Wolf, Steven L
Weiss, Paul
author_facet Butler, Andrew J
Kahn, Shannon
Wolf, Steven L
Weiss, Paul
author_sort Butler, Andrew J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study determined the reliability of topographic motor cortical maps and MEP characteristics in the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) evoked by single-pulse TMS among patients with chronic stroke. METHODS: Each of ten patients was studied on three occasions. Measures included location of the EDC hotspot and center of gravity (COG), threshold of activation and average amplitude of the hotspot, number of active sites, map volume, and recruitment curve (RC) slope. RESULTS: Consistent intrahemispheric measurements were obtained for the three TMS mapping sessions for all measured variables. No statistically significant difference was observed between hemispheres for the number of active sites, COG distance or the RC slope. The magnitude and range of COG movement between sessions were similar to those reported previously with this muscle in able-bodied individuals. The average COG movement over three sessions in both hemispheres was 0.90 cm. The average COG movement in the affected hemisphere was 1.13 (± 0.08) cm, and 0.68 (± 0.04) cm) for the less affected hemisphere. However, significant interhemispheric variability was seen for the average MEP amplitude, normalized map volume, and resting motor threshold. CONCLUSION: The physiologic variability in some TMS measurements of EDC suggest that interpretation of TMS mapping data derived from hemiparetic patients in the chronic stage following stroke should be undertaken cautiously. Irrespective of the muscle, potential causes of variability should be resolved to accurately assess the impact of pharmacological or physical interventions on cortical organization as measured by TMS among patients with stroke.
format Text
id pubmed-1175099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-11750992005-07-14 Finger extensor variability in TMS parameters among chronic stroke patients Butler, Andrew J Kahn, Shannon Wolf, Steven L Weiss, Paul J Neuroengineering Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: This study determined the reliability of topographic motor cortical maps and MEP characteristics in the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) evoked by single-pulse TMS among patients with chronic stroke. METHODS: Each of ten patients was studied on three occasions. Measures included location of the EDC hotspot and center of gravity (COG), threshold of activation and average amplitude of the hotspot, number of active sites, map volume, and recruitment curve (RC) slope. RESULTS: Consistent intrahemispheric measurements were obtained for the three TMS mapping sessions for all measured variables. No statistically significant difference was observed between hemispheres for the number of active sites, COG distance or the RC slope. The magnitude and range of COG movement between sessions were similar to those reported previously with this muscle in able-bodied individuals. The average COG movement over three sessions in both hemispheres was 0.90 cm. The average COG movement in the affected hemisphere was 1.13 (± 0.08) cm, and 0.68 (± 0.04) cm) for the less affected hemisphere. However, significant interhemispheric variability was seen for the average MEP amplitude, normalized map volume, and resting motor threshold. CONCLUSION: The physiologic variability in some TMS measurements of EDC suggest that interpretation of TMS mapping data derived from hemiparetic patients in the chronic stage following stroke should be undertaken cautiously. Irrespective of the muscle, potential causes of variability should be resolved to accurately assess the impact of pharmacological or physical interventions on cortical organization as measured by TMS among patients with stroke. BioMed Central 2005-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC1175099/ /pubmed/15927075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-2-10 Text en Copyright © 2005 Butler et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Butler, Andrew J
Kahn, Shannon
Wolf, Steven L
Weiss, Paul
Finger extensor variability in TMS parameters among chronic stroke patients
title Finger extensor variability in TMS parameters among chronic stroke patients
title_full Finger extensor variability in TMS parameters among chronic stroke patients
title_fullStr Finger extensor variability in TMS parameters among chronic stroke patients
title_full_unstemmed Finger extensor variability in TMS parameters among chronic stroke patients
title_short Finger extensor variability in TMS parameters among chronic stroke patients
title_sort finger extensor variability in tms parameters among chronic stroke patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1175099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15927075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-2-10
work_keys_str_mv AT butlerandrewj fingerextensorvariabilityintmsparametersamongchronicstrokepatients
AT kahnshannon fingerextensorvariabilityintmsparametersamongchronicstrokepatients
AT wolfstevenl fingerextensorvariabilityintmsparametersamongchronicstrokepatients
AT weisspaul fingerextensorvariabilityintmsparametersamongchronicstrokepatients