Cargando…

Bench-to-bedside review: Therapeutic options and issues in the management of ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia

Despite progress in the diagnosis, prevention and therapy for hospital-acquired infections, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) continues to complicate the course of a significant proportion of patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Mortality rates among patients with VAP have been reported to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Rello, Jordi
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1175866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15987380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3014
_version_ 1782124522243096576
author Rello, Jordi
author_facet Rello, Jordi
author_sort Rello, Jordi
collection PubMed
description Despite progress in the diagnosis, prevention and therapy for hospital-acquired infections, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) continues to complicate the course of a significant proportion of patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Mortality rates among patients with VAP have been reported to be as high as 72%, and the morbidity associated with VAP is also considerable, adding days to the hospital stay and increasing health care costs. Appropriate initial antimicrobial therapy for patients with VAP has been shown to reduce mortality rates and improve outcomes; therefore, rapid identification of infected patients and timely, accurate selection of effective antimicrobial agents are important clinical goals. The primary organisms responsible for VAP include Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. However, aetiologies differ considerably between intensive care units, and the increase in antibiotic resistance and nosocomial outbreaks worldwide have presented clinicians with a serious dilemma with respect to selecting appropriate empirical therapy. To date, no optimal antimicrobial regimen for the treatment of VAP has been identified, largely because none of the currently marketed antibiotics has a sufficiently extended spectrum of activity to cover all of the potential key pathogens. More active, less toxic antibacterial agents are still needed, in particular to combat problematic pathogens such as multiresistant Gram-negative bacilli and resistant Gram-positive organisms (e.g. methicillin-resistant S aureus).
format Text
id pubmed-1175866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-11758662005-07-17 Bench-to-bedside review: Therapeutic options and issues in the management of ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia Rello, Jordi Crit Care Review Despite progress in the diagnosis, prevention and therapy for hospital-acquired infections, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) continues to complicate the course of a significant proportion of patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Mortality rates among patients with VAP have been reported to be as high as 72%, and the morbidity associated with VAP is also considerable, adding days to the hospital stay and increasing health care costs. Appropriate initial antimicrobial therapy for patients with VAP has been shown to reduce mortality rates and improve outcomes; therefore, rapid identification of infected patients and timely, accurate selection of effective antimicrobial agents are important clinical goals. The primary organisms responsible for VAP include Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. However, aetiologies differ considerably between intensive care units, and the increase in antibiotic resistance and nosocomial outbreaks worldwide have presented clinicians with a serious dilemma with respect to selecting appropriate empirical therapy. To date, no optimal antimicrobial regimen for the treatment of VAP has been identified, largely because none of the currently marketed antibiotics has a sufficiently extended spectrum of activity to cover all of the potential key pathogens. More active, less toxic antibacterial agents are still needed, in particular to combat problematic pathogens such as multiresistant Gram-negative bacilli and resistant Gram-positive organisms (e.g. methicillin-resistant S aureus). BioMed Central 2005 2004-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC1175866/ /pubmed/15987380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3014 Text en Copyright © 2004 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Review
Rello, Jordi
Bench-to-bedside review: Therapeutic options and issues in the management of ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia
title Bench-to-bedside review: Therapeutic options and issues in the management of ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia
title_full Bench-to-bedside review: Therapeutic options and issues in the management of ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia
title_fullStr Bench-to-bedside review: Therapeutic options and issues in the management of ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia
title_full_unstemmed Bench-to-bedside review: Therapeutic options and issues in the management of ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia
title_short Bench-to-bedside review: Therapeutic options and issues in the management of ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia
title_sort bench-to-bedside review: therapeutic options and issues in the management of ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1175866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15987380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3014
work_keys_str_mv AT rellojordi benchtobedsidereviewtherapeuticoptionsandissuesinthemanagementofventilatorassociatedbacterialpneumonia