Cargando…

Bench-to-bedside review: Inotropic drug therapy after adult cardiac surgery – a systematic literature review

Many adult patients require temporary inotropic support after cardiac surgery. We reviewed the literature systematically to establish, present and classify the evidence regarding choice of inotropic drugs. The available evidence, while limited in quality and scope, supports the following observation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gillies, Michael, Bellomo, Rinaldo, Doolan, Laurie, Buxton, Brian
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1175868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15987381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3024
_version_ 1782124522747461632
author Gillies, Michael
Bellomo, Rinaldo
Doolan, Laurie
Buxton, Brian
author_facet Gillies, Michael
Bellomo, Rinaldo
Doolan, Laurie
Buxton, Brian
author_sort Gillies, Michael
collection PubMed
description Many adult patients require temporary inotropic support after cardiac surgery. We reviewed the literature systematically to establish, present and classify the evidence regarding choice of inotropic drugs. The available evidence, while limited in quality and scope, supports the following observations; although all β-agonists can increase cardiac output, the best studied β-agonist and the one with the most favourable side-effect profile appears to be dobutamine. Dobutamine and phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDIs) are efficacious inotropic drugs for management of the low cardiac output syndrome. Dobutamine is associated with a greater incidence of tachycardia and tachyarrhythmias, whereas PDIs often require the administration of vasoconstrictors. Other catecholamines have no clear advantages over dobutamine. PDIs increase the likelihood of successful weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass as compared with placebo. There is insufficient evidence that inotropic drugs should be selected for their effects on regional perfusion. PDIs also increase flow through arterial grafts, reduce mean pulmonary artery pressure and improve right heart performance in pulmonary hypertension. Insufficient data exist to allow selection of a specific inotropic agent in preference over another in adult cardiac surgery patients. Multicentre randomized controlled trials focusing on clinical rather than physiological outcomes are needed.
format Text
id pubmed-1175868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-11758682005-07-17 Bench-to-bedside review: Inotropic drug therapy after adult cardiac surgery – a systematic literature review Gillies, Michael Bellomo, Rinaldo Doolan, Laurie Buxton, Brian Crit Care Review Many adult patients require temporary inotropic support after cardiac surgery. We reviewed the literature systematically to establish, present and classify the evidence regarding choice of inotropic drugs. The available evidence, while limited in quality and scope, supports the following observations; although all β-agonists can increase cardiac output, the best studied β-agonist and the one with the most favourable side-effect profile appears to be dobutamine. Dobutamine and phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDIs) are efficacious inotropic drugs for management of the low cardiac output syndrome. Dobutamine is associated with a greater incidence of tachycardia and tachyarrhythmias, whereas PDIs often require the administration of vasoconstrictors. Other catecholamines have no clear advantages over dobutamine. PDIs increase the likelihood of successful weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass as compared with placebo. There is insufficient evidence that inotropic drugs should be selected for their effects on regional perfusion. PDIs also increase flow through arterial grafts, reduce mean pulmonary artery pressure and improve right heart performance in pulmonary hypertension. Insufficient data exist to allow selection of a specific inotropic agent in preference over another in adult cardiac surgery patients. Multicentre randomized controlled trials focusing on clinical rather than physiological outcomes are needed. BioMed Central 2005 2004-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC1175868/ /pubmed/15987381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3024 Text en Copyright © 2004 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Review
Gillies, Michael
Bellomo, Rinaldo
Doolan, Laurie
Buxton, Brian
Bench-to-bedside review: Inotropic drug therapy after adult cardiac surgery – a systematic literature review
title Bench-to-bedside review: Inotropic drug therapy after adult cardiac surgery – a systematic literature review
title_full Bench-to-bedside review: Inotropic drug therapy after adult cardiac surgery – a systematic literature review
title_fullStr Bench-to-bedside review: Inotropic drug therapy after adult cardiac surgery – a systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Bench-to-bedside review: Inotropic drug therapy after adult cardiac surgery – a systematic literature review
title_short Bench-to-bedside review: Inotropic drug therapy after adult cardiac surgery – a systematic literature review
title_sort bench-to-bedside review: inotropic drug therapy after adult cardiac surgery – a systematic literature review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1175868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15987381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3024
work_keys_str_mv AT gilliesmichael benchtobedsidereviewinotropicdrugtherapyafteradultcardiacsurgeryasystematicliteraturereview
AT bellomorinaldo benchtobedsidereviewinotropicdrugtherapyafteradultcardiacsurgeryasystematicliteraturereview
AT doolanlaurie benchtobedsidereviewinotropicdrugtherapyafteradultcardiacsurgeryasystematicliteraturereview
AT buxtonbrian benchtobedsidereviewinotropicdrugtherapyafteradultcardiacsurgeryasystematicliteraturereview