Ethics roundtable debate: Is a physician–patient confidentiality relationship subservient to a greater good?

Is a health care provider's most proximal obligation to individuals or society as a whole? Our International panel of critical care providers grapple over the issue of whether patient–physician confidentiality exists as an open ended ideal it should be subservient to a greater good.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cotton, Chris, Crippen, David W, Kapadia, Farhad, Morgan, Arthur, Murray, Holt N, Ross, Gil
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Commentary
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1175898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15987407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3527
_version_ 1782124534468444160
author Cotton, Chris
Crippen, David W
Kapadia, Farhad
Morgan, Arthur
Murray, Holt N
Ross, Gil
author_facet Cotton, Chris
Crippen, David W
Kapadia, Farhad
Morgan, Arthur
Murray, Holt N
Ross, Gil
author_sort Cotton, Chris
collection PubMed
description Is a health care provider's most proximal obligation to individuals or society as a whole? Our International panel of critical care providers grapple over the issue of whether patient–physician confidentiality exists as an open ended ideal it should be subservient to a greater good.
format Text
id pubmed-1175898
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-11758982005-07-17 Ethics roundtable debate: Is a physician–patient confidentiality relationship subservient to a greater good? Cotton, Chris Crippen, David W Kapadia, Farhad Morgan, Arthur Murray, Holt N Ross, Gil Crit Care Commentary Is a health care provider's most proximal obligation to individuals or society as a whole? Our International panel of critical care providers grapple over the issue of whether patient–physician confidentiality exists as an open ended ideal it should be subservient to a greater good. BioMed Central 2005 2005-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC1175898/ /pubmed/15987407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3527 Text en Copyright © 2005 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Cotton, Chris
Crippen, David W
Kapadia, Farhad
Morgan, Arthur
Murray, Holt N
Ross, Gil
Ethics roundtable debate: Is a physician–patient confidentiality relationship subservient to a greater good?
title Ethics roundtable debate: Is a physician–patient confidentiality relationship subservient to a greater good?
title_full Ethics roundtable debate: Is a physician–patient confidentiality relationship subservient to a greater good?
title_fullStr Ethics roundtable debate: Is a physician–patient confidentiality relationship subservient to a greater good?
title_full_unstemmed Ethics roundtable debate: Is a physician–patient confidentiality relationship subservient to a greater good?
title_short Ethics roundtable debate: Is a physician–patient confidentiality relationship subservient to a greater good?
title_sort ethics roundtable debate: is a physician–patient confidentiality relationship subservient to a greater good?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1175898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15987407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3527
work_keys_str_mv AT cottonchris ethicsroundtabledebateisaphysicianpatientconfidentialityrelationshipsubservienttoagreatergood
AT crippendavidw ethicsroundtabledebateisaphysicianpatientconfidentialityrelationshipsubservienttoagreatergood
AT kapadiafarhad ethicsroundtabledebateisaphysicianpatientconfidentialityrelationshipsubservienttoagreatergood
AT morganarthur ethicsroundtabledebateisaphysicianpatientconfidentialityrelationshipsubservienttoagreatergood
AT murrayholtn ethicsroundtabledebateisaphysicianpatientconfidentialityrelationshipsubservienttoagreatergood
AT rossgil ethicsroundtabledebateisaphysicianpatientconfidentialityrelationshipsubservienttoagreatergood

Ejemplares similares