Cargando…
Practice of sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: results of a national survey
INTRODUCTION: Sedation and analgesia are provided by using different agents and techniques in different countries. The goal is to achieve early spontaneous breathing and to obtain an awake and cooperative pain-free patient. It was the aim of this study to conduct a survey of the agents and technique...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1175921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15774043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3035 |
_version_ | 1782124540347809792 |
---|---|
author | Martin, Jörg Parsch, Axel Franck, Martin Wernecke, Klaus D Fischer, Matthias Spies, Claudia |
author_facet | Martin, Jörg Parsch, Axel Franck, Martin Wernecke, Klaus D Fischer, Matthias Spies, Claudia |
author_sort | Martin, Jörg |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Sedation and analgesia are provided by using different agents and techniques in different countries. The goal is to achieve early spontaneous breathing and to obtain an awake and cooperative pain-free patient. It was the aim of this study to conduct a survey of the agents and techniques used for analgesia and sedation in intensive care units in Germany. METHODS: A survey was sent by mail to 261 hospitals in Germany. The anesthesiologists running the intensive care unit were asked to fill in the structured questionnaire about their use of sedation and analgesia. RESULTS: A total of 220 (84%) questionnaires were completed and returned. The RAMSAY sedation scale was used in 8% of the hospitals. A written policy was available in 21% of hospitals. For short-term sedation in most hospitals, propofol was used in combination with sufentanil or fentanyl. For long-term sedation, midazolam/fentanyl was preferred. Clonidine was a common part of up to two-thirds of the regimens. Epidural analgesia was used in up to 68%. Neuromuscular blocking agents were no longer used. CONCLUSION: In contrast to the US 'Clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adult', our survey showed that in Germany different agents, and frequently neuroaxial techniques, were used. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1175921 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-11759212005-07-17 Practice of sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: results of a national survey Martin, Jörg Parsch, Axel Franck, Martin Wernecke, Klaus D Fischer, Matthias Spies, Claudia Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Sedation and analgesia are provided by using different agents and techniques in different countries. The goal is to achieve early spontaneous breathing and to obtain an awake and cooperative pain-free patient. It was the aim of this study to conduct a survey of the agents and techniques used for analgesia and sedation in intensive care units in Germany. METHODS: A survey was sent by mail to 261 hospitals in Germany. The anesthesiologists running the intensive care unit were asked to fill in the structured questionnaire about their use of sedation and analgesia. RESULTS: A total of 220 (84%) questionnaires were completed and returned. The RAMSAY sedation scale was used in 8% of the hospitals. A written policy was available in 21% of hospitals. For short-term sedation in most hospitals, propofol was used in combination with sufentanil or fentanyl. For long-term sedation, midazolam/fentanyl was preferred. Clonidine was a common part of up to two-thirds of the regimens. Epidural analgesia was used in up to 68%. Neuromuscular blocking agents were no longer used. CONCLUSION: In contrast to the US 'Clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adult', our survey showed that in Germany different agents, and frequently neuroaxial techniques, were used. BioMed Central 2005 2005-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC1175921/ /pubmed/15774043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3035 Text en Copyright © 2005 Martin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
spellingShingle | Research Martin, Jörg Parsch, Axel Franck, Martin Wernecke, Klaus D Fischer, Matthias Spies, Claudia Practice of sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: results of a national survey |
title | Practice of sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: results of a national survey |
title_full | Practice of sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: results of a national survey |
title_fullStr | Practice of sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: results of a national survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Practice of sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: results of a national survey |
title_short | Practice of sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: results of a national survey |
title_sort | practice of sedation and analgesia in german intensive care units: results of a national survey |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1175921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15774043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3035 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinjorg practiceofsedationandanalgesiaingermanintensivecareunitsresultsofanationalsurvey AT parschaxel practiceofsedationandanalgesiaingermanintensivecareunitsresultsofanationalsurvey AT franckmartin practiceofsedationandanalgesiaingermanintensivecareunitsresultsofanationalsurvey AT werneckeklausd practiceofsedationandanalgesiaingermanintensivecareunitsresultsofanationalsurvey AT fischermatthias practiceofsedationandanalgesiaingermanintensivecareunitsresultsofanationalsurvey AT spiesclaudia practiceofsedationandanalgesiaingermanintensivecareunitsresultsofanationalsurvey |