Cargando…

Practice of sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: results of a national survey

INTRODUCTION: Sedation and analgesia are provided by using different agents and techniques in different countries. The goal is to achieve early spontaneous breathing and to obtain an awake and cooperative pain-free patient. It was the aim of this study to conduct a survey of the agents and technique...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin, Jörg, Parsch, Axel, Franck, Martin, Wernecke, Klaus D, Fischer, Matthias, Spies, Claudia
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1175921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15774043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3035
_version_ 1782124540347809792
author Martin, Jörg
Parsch, Axel
Franck, Martin
Wernecke, Klaus D
Fischer, Matthias
Spies, Claudia
author_facet Martin, Jörg
Parsch, Axel
Franck, Martin
Wernecke, Klaus D
Fischer, Matthias
Spies, Claudia
author_sort Martin, Jörg
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Sedation and analgesia are provided by using different agents and techniques in different countries. The goal is to achieve early spontaneous breathing and to obtain an awake and cooperative pain-free patient. It was the aim of this study to conduct a survey of the agents and techniques used for analgesia and sedation in intensive care units in Germany. METHODS: A survey was sent by mail to 261 hospitals in Germany. The anesthesiologists running the intensive care unit were asked to fill in the structured questionnaire about their use of sedation and analgesia. RESULTS: A total of 220 (84%) questionnaires were completed and returned. The RAMSAY sedation scale was used in 8% of the hospitals. A written policy was available in 21% of hospitals. For short-term sedation in most hospitals, propofol was used in combination with sufentanil or fentanyl. For long-term sedation, midazolam/fentanyl was preferred. Clonidine was a common part of up to two-thirds of the regimens. Epidural analgesia was used in up to 68%. Neuromuscular blocking agents were no longer used. CONCLUSION: In contrast to the US 'Clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adult', our survey showed that in Germany different agents, and frequently neuroaxial techniques, were used.
format Text
id pubmed-1175921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-11759212005-07-17 Practice of sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: results of a national survey Martin, Jörg Parsch, Axel Franck, Martin Wernecke, Klaus D Fischer, Matthias Spies, Claudia Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Sedation and analgesia are provided by using different agents and techniques in different countries. The goal is to achieve early spontaneous breathing and to obtain an awake and cooperative pain-free patient. It was the aim of this study to conduct a survey of the agents and techniques used for analgesia and sedation in intensive care units in Germany. METHODS: A survey was sent by mail to 261 hospitals in Germany. The anesthesiologists running the intensive care unit were asked to fill in the structured questionnaire about their use of sedation and analgesia. RESULTS: A total of 220 (84%) questionnaires were completed and returned. The RAMSAY sedation scale was used in 8% of the hospitals. A written policy was available in 21% of hospitals. For short-term sedation in most hospitals, propofol was used in combination with sufentanil or fentanyl. For long-term sedation, midazolam/fentanyl was preferred. Clonidine was a common part of up to two-thirds of the regimens. Epidural analgesia was used in up to 68%. Neuromuscular blocking agents were no longer used. CONCLUSION: In contrast to the US 'Clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adult', our survey showed that in Germany different agents, and frequently neuroaxial techniques, were used. BioMed Central 2005 2005-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC1175921/ /pubmed/15774043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3035 Text en Copyright © 2005 Martin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
spellingShingle Research
Martin, Jörg
Parsch, Axel
Franck, Martin
Wernecke, Klaus D
Fischer, Matthias
Spies, Claudia
Practice of sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: results of a national survey
title Practice of sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: results of a national survey
title_full Practice of sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: results of a national survey
title_fullStr Practice of sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: results of a national survey
title_full_unstemmed Practice of sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: results of a national survey
title_short Practice of sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: results of a national survey
title_sort practice of sedation and analgesia in german intensive care units: results of a national survey
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1175921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15774043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3035
work_keys_str_mv AT martinjorg practiceofsedationandanalgesiaingermanintensivecareunitsresultsofanationalsurvey
AT parschaxel practiceofsedationandanalgesiaingermanintensivecareunitsresultsofanationalsurvey
AT franckmartin practiceofsedationandanalgesiaingermanintensivecareunitsresultsofanationalsurvey
AT werneckeklausd practiceofsedationandanalgesiaingermanintensivecareunitsresultsofanationalsurvey
AT fischermatthias practiceofsedationandanalgesiaingermanintensivecareunitsresultsofanationalsurvey
AT spiesclaudia practiceofsedationandanalgesiaingermanintensivecareunitsresultsofanationalsurvey