Cargando…

Estimation of pulmonary capillary pressure: different methods for different pathophysiological processes?

In the absence of a direct method with which to measure pulmonary capillary pressure in humans, various methods for analyzing the pulmonary artery pressure decay following balloon occlusion have been described. In this issue of Critical Care, Souza and coworkers investigate the adequacy of these met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Nunes, Silvia
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1175936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15774065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3060
_version_ 1782124544144703488
author Nunes, Silvia
author_facet Nunes, Silvia
author_sort Nunes, Silvia
collection PubMed
description In the absence of a direct method with which to measure pulmonary capillary pressure in humans, various methods for analyzing the pulmonary artery pressure decay following balloon occlusion have been described. In this issue of Critical Care, Souza and coworkers investigate the adequacy of these methods for assessing various pathophysiological processes. They studied patients presenting with pathologies characterized by different distributions of pulmonary vascular resistance. Their findings suggest that no single method for estimating pulmonary capillary pressure is adequate for all disease processes.
format Text
id pubmed-1175936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-11759362005-07-17 Estimation of pulmonary capillary pressure: different methods for different pathophysiological processes? Nunes, Silvia Crit Care Commentary In the absence of a direct method with which to measure pulmonary capillary pressure in humans, various methods for analyzing the pulmonary artery pressure decay following balloon occlusion have been described. In this issue of Critical Care, Souza and coworkers investigate the adequacy of these methods for assessing various pathophysiological processes. They studied patients presenting with pathologies characterized by different distributions of pulmonary vascular resistance. Their findings suggest that no single method for estimating pulmonary capillary pressure is adequate for all disease processes. BioMed Central 2005 2005-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC1175936/ /pubmed/15774065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3060 Text en Copyright © 2005 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Nunes, Silvia
Estimation of pulmonary capillary pressure: different methods for different pathophysiological processes?
title Estimation of pulmonary capillary pressure: different methods for different pathophysiological processes?
title_full Estimation of pulmonary capillary pressure: different methods for different pathophysiological processes?
title_fullStr Estimation of pulmonary capillary pressure: different methods for different pathophysiological processes?
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of pulmonary capillary pressure: different methods for different pathophysiological processes?
title_short Estimation of pulmonary capillary pressure: different methods for different pathophysiological processes?
title_sort estimation of pulmonary capillary pressure: different methods for different pathophysiological processes?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1175936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15774065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3060
work_keys_str_mv AT nunessilvia estimationofpulmonarycapillarypressuredifferentmethodsfordifferentpathophysiologicalprocesses