Cargando…
The rarity of gene shuffling in conserved genes
BACKGROUND: Among three sources of evolutionary innovation in gene function - point mutations, gene duplications, and gene shuffling (recombination between dissimilar genes) - gene shuffling is the most potent one. However, surprisingly little is known about its incidence on a genome-wide scale. RES...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1175970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15960802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2005-6-6-r50 |
_version_ | 1782124553006219264 |
---|---|
author | Conant, Gavin C Wagner, Andreas |
author_facet | Conant, Gavin C Wagner, Andreas |
author_sort | Conant, Gavin C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Among three sources of evolutionary innovation in gene function - point mutations, gene duplications, and gene shuffling (recombination between dissimilar genes) - gene shuffling is the most potent one. However, surprisingly little is known about its incidence on a genome-wide scale. RESULTS: We have studied shuffling in genes that are conserved between distantly related species. Specifically, we estimated the incidence of gene shuffling in ten organisms from the three domains of life: eukaryotes, eubacteria, and archaea, considering only genes showing significant sequence similarity in pairwise genome comparisons. We found that successful gene shuffling is very rare among such conserved genes. For example, we could detect only 48 successful gene-shuffling events in the genome of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster which have occurred since its common ancestor with the worm Caenorhabditis elegans more than half a billion years ago. CONCLUSION: The incidence of gene shuffling is roughly an order of magnitude smaller than the incidence of single-gene duplication in eukaryotes, but it can approach or even exceed the gene-duplication rate in prokaryotes. If true in general, this pattern suggests that gene shuffling may not be a major force in reshaping the core genomes of eukaryotes. Our results also cast doubt on the notion that introns facilitate gene shuffling, both because prokaryotes show an appreciable incidence of gene shuffling despite their lack of introns and because we find no statistical association between exon-intron boundaries and recombined domains in the two multicellular genomes we studied. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1175970 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-11759702005-07-17 The rarity of gene shuffling in conserved genes Conant, Gavin C Wagner, Andreas Genome Biol Research BACKGROUND: Among three sources of evolutionary innovation in gene function - point mutations, gene duplications, and gene shuffling (recombination between dissimilar genes) - gene shuffling is the most potent one. However, surprisingly little is known about its incidence on a genome-wide scale. RESULTS: We have studied shuffling in genes that are conserved between distantly related species. Specifically, we estimated the incidence of gene shuffling in ten organisms from the three domains of life: eukaryotes, eubacteria, and archaea, considering only genes showing significant sequence similarity in pairwise genome comparisons. We found that successful gene shuffling is very rare among such conserved genes. For example, we could detect only 48 successful gene-shuffling events in the genome of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster which have occurred since its common ancestor with the worm Caenorhabditis elegans more than half a billion years ago. CONCLUSION: The incidence of gene shuffling is roughly an order of magnitude smaller than the incidence of single-gene duplication in eukaryotes, but it can approach or even exceed the gene-duplication rate in prokaryotes. If true in general, this pattern suggests that gene shuffling may not be a major force in reshaping the core genomes of eukaryotes. Our results also cast doubt on the notion that introns facilitate gene shuffling, both because prokaryotes show an appreciable incidence of gene shuffling despite their lack of introns and because we find no statistical association between exon-intron boundaries and recombined domains in the two multicellular genomes we studied. BioMed Central 2005 2005-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC1175970/ /pubmed/15960802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2005-6-6-r50 Text en Copyright © 2005 Conant and Wagner; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
spellingShingle | Research Conant, Gavin C Wagner, Andreas The rarity of gene shuffling in conserved genes |
title | The rarity of gene shuffling in conserved genes |
title_full | The rarity of gene shuffling in conserved genes |
title_fullStr | The rarity of gene shuffling in conserved genes |
title_full_unstemmed | The rarity of gene shuffling in conserved genes |
title_short | The rarity of gene shuffling in conserved genes |
title_sort | rarity of gene shuffling in conserved genes |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1175970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15960802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2005-6-6-r50 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT conantgavinc therarityofgeneshufflinginconservedgenes AT wagnerandreas therarityofgeneshufflinginconservedgenes AT conantgavinc rarityofgeneshufflinginconservedgenes AT wagnerandreas rarityofgeneshufflinginconservedgenes |