Cargando…

Measurement of vaccination coverage at age 24 and 19–35 months: a case study of multiple imputation in public health

AIM: Childhood immunization coverage in the United States (U.S.) is often measured at age 24 months or, in the National Immunization Survey (NIS) at age of interview, which is between 19 and 35 months. This paper compares these standards. METHODS: Data from the NIS is used to compare immunization co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santibanez, Tammy A, Barker, Lawrence E, Shaw, Kate M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1190214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15998465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-3-6
_version_ 1782124809383051264
author Santibanez, Tammy A
Barker, Lawrence E
Shaw, Kate M
author_facet Santibanez, Tammy A
Barker, Lawrence E
Shaw, Kate M
author_sort Santibanez, Tammy A
collection PubMed
description AIM: Childhood immunization coverage in the United States (U.S.) is often measured at age 24 months or, in the National Immunization Survey (NIS) at age of interview, which is between 19 and 35 months. This paper compares these standards. METHODS: Data from the NIS is used to compare immunization coverage at time of interview, retrospectively among all children aged 24 or more months at time of interview, and obtained via multiple imputation (with 10 imputations) for all children, both nationally, by state, and by demographic groups. RESULTS: At the national level, the difference between the 19–35 month estimate and the 24 month complete-case estimate was 1.9 percentage points. For most but not all states and subgroups, the 19–35 month estimate was higher than the 24 month complete-case estimate. The difference between vaccination coverage measured at 19–35 months and 24 months ranged from -2.3 to 7.5 percentage points among states. For three states, the difference between the 19–35 month and 24 month complete-case estimate was more than 6 percentage points, in twelve states there was a 4–6 percentage point difference, and in sixteen states a 2–4 percentage point difference. Conversely, five states had higher 24 month complete-case estimates than 19–35 month estimates. CONCLUSION: We found that the coverages at 19–35 and 24 months differ such that they would rarely be adequate surrogates for one another, particularly at a state level. Multiple imputation, which is easily implemented, increases precision of estimates of coverage at age 24 months.
format Text
id pubmed-1190214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-11902142005-08-25 Measurement of vaccination coverage at age 24 and 19–35 months: a case study of multiple imputation in public health Santibanez, Tammy A Barker, Lawrence E Shaw, Kate M Popul Health Metr Research AIM: Childhood immunization coverage in the United States (U.S.) is often measured at age 24 months or, in the National Immunization Survey (NIS) at age of interview, which is between 19 and 35 months. This paper compares these standards. METHODS: Data from the NIS is used to compare immunization coverage at time of interview, retrospectively among all children aged 24 or more months at time of interview, and obtained via multiple imputation (with 10 imputations) for all children, both nationally, by state, and by demographic groups. RESULTS: At the national level, the difference between the 19–35 month estimate and the 24 month complete-case estimate was 1.9 percentage points. For most but not all states and subgroups, the 19–35 month estimate was higher than the 24 month complete-case estimate. The difference between vaccination coverage measured at 19–35 months and 24 months ranged from -2.3 to 7.5 percentage points among states. For three states, the difference between the 19–35 month and 24 month complete-case estimate was more than 6 percentage points, in twelve states there was a 4–6 percentage point difference, and in sixteen states a 2–4 percentage point difference. Conversely, five states had higher 24 month complete-case estimates than 19–35 month estimates. CONCLUSION: We found that the coverages at 19–35 and 24 months differ such that they would rarely be adequate surrogates for one another, particularly at a state level. Multiple imputation, which is easily implemented, increases precision of estimates of coverage at age 24 months. BioMed Central 2005-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC1190214/ /pubmed/15998465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-3-6 Text en Copyright © 2005 Santibanez et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Santibanez, Tammy A
Barker, Lawrence E
Shaw, Kate M
Measurement of vaccination coverage at age 24 and 19–35 months: a case study of multiple imputation in public health
title Measurement of vaccination coverage at age 24 and 19–35 months: a case study of multiple imputation in public health
title_full Measurement of vaccination coverage at age 24 and 19–35 months: a case study of multiple imputation in public health
title_fullStr Measurement of vaccination coverage at age 24 and 19–35 months: a case study of multiple imputation in public health
title_full_unstemmed Measurement of vaccination coverage at age 24 and 19–35 months: a case study of multiple imputation in public health
title_short Measurement of vaccination coverage at age 24 and 19–35 months: a case study of multiple imputation in public health
title_sort measurement of vaccination coverage at age 24 and 19–35 months: a case study of multiple imputation in public health
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1190214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15998465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-3-6
work_keys_str_mv AT santibaneztammya measurementofvaccinationcoverageatage24and1935monthsacasestudyofmultipleimputationinpublichealth
AT barkerlawrencee measurementofvaccinationcoverageatage24and1935monthsacasestudyofmultipleimputationinpublichealth
AT shawkatem measurementofvaccinationcoverageatage24and1935monthsacasestudyofmultipleimputationinpublichealth