Cargando…

Local versus systemic effect of ovulation-inducing factor in the seminal plasma of alpacas

BACKGROUND: Camelids are induced (reflex) ovulators. We have recently documented the presence of an ovulation-inducing factor (OIF) in the seminal plasma of alpacas and llamas. The objective was to test the hypothesis that OIF exerts its effect via a systemic rather than a local route and that endom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ratto, Marcelo H, Huanca, Wilfredo, Singh, Jaswant, Adams, Gregg P
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1190216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16018817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-3-29
_version_ 1782124809842327552
author Ratto, Marcelo H
Huanca, Wilfredo
Singh, Jaswant
Adams, Gregg P
author_facet Ratto, Marcelo H
Huanca, Wilfredo
Singh, Jaswant
Adams, Gregg P
author_sort Ratto, Marcelo H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Camelids are induced (reflex) ovulators. We have recently documented the presence of an ovulation-inducing factor (OIF) in the seminal plasma of alpacas and llamas. The objective was to test the hypothesis that OIF exerts its effect via a systemic rather than a local route and that endometrial curettage will enhance the ovulatory response to intrauterine deposition of seminal plasma in alpacas. METHODS: Female alpacas were assigned randomly to 6 groups (n = 15 to 17 per group) in a 2 × 3 factorial design to test the effect of seminal plasma versus phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) given by intramuscular injection, by intrauterine infusion, or by intrauterine infusion after endometrial curettage. Specifically, alpacas in the respective groups were given 1) 2 ml of alpaca seminal plasma intramuscularly, 2) 2 ml of PBS intramuscularly (negative control group), 3) 2 ml of alpaca seminal plasma by intrauterine infusion, 4) 2 ml of PBS by intrauterine infusion (negative control group), 5) 2 ml of alpaca seminal plasma by intrauterine infusion after endometrial curettage, or 6) 2 ml of PBS by intrauterine infusion after endometrial curettage (negative control group). The alpacas were examined by transrectal ultrasonography to detect ovulation and measure follicular and luteal diameters. RESULTS: Intramuscular administration of seminal plasma resulted in a higher ovulation rate than intrauterine administration of seminal plasma (93% versus 41%; P < 0.01), while intrauterine seminal plasma after endometrial curettage was intermediate (67%). None of the saline-treated controls ovulated. The diameter of the CL after treatment-induced ovulation was not affected by the route of administration of seminal plasma. CONCLUSION: We conclude that 1) OIF in seminal plasma effects ovulation via a systemic rather than a local route, 2) disruption of the endometrial mucosa by curettage facilitated the absorption of OIF and increased the ovulatory effect of seminal plasma, and 3) ovulation in alpacas is not associated with a physical stimulation of the genital tract, and 4) the alpaca represents an excellent biological model to evaluate the bioactivity of OIF.
format Text
id pubmed-1190216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-11902162005-08-25 Local versus systemic effect of ovulation-inducing factor in the seminal plasma of alpacas Ratto, Marcelo H Huanca, Wilfredo Singh, Jaswant Adams, Gregg P Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Camelids are induced (reflex) ovulators. We have recently documented the presence of an ovulation-inducing factor (OIF) in the seminal plasma of alpacas and llamas. The objective was to test the hypothesis that OIF exerts its effect via a systemic rather than a local route and that endometrial curettage will enhance the ovulatory response to intrauterine deposition of seminal plasma in alpacas. METHODS: Female alpacas were assigned randomly to 6 groups (n = 15 to 17 per group) in a 2 × 3 factorial design to test the effect of seminal plasma versus phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) given by intramuscular injection, by intrauterine infusion, or by intrauterine infusion after endometrial curettage. Specifically, alpacas in the respective groups were given 1) 2 ml of alpaca seminal plasma intramuscularly, 2) 2 ml of PBS intramuscularly (negative control group), 3) 2 ml of alpaca seminal plasma by intrauterine infusion, 4) 2 ml of PBS by intrauterine infusion (negative control group), 5) 2 ml of alpaca seminal plasma by intrauterine infusion after endometrial curettage, or 6) 2 ml of PBS by intrauterine infusion after endometrial curettage (negative control group). The alpacas were examined by transrectal ultrasonography to detect ovulation and measure follicular and luteal diameters. RESULTS: Intramuscular administration of seminal plasma resulted in a higher ovulation rate than intrauterine administration of seminal plasma (93% versus 41%; P < 0.01), while intrauterine seminal plasma after endometrial curettage was intermediate (67%). None of the saline-treated controls ovulated. The diameter of the CL after treatment-induced ovulation was not affected by the route of administration of seminal plasma. CONCLUSION: We conclude that 1) OIF in seminal plasma effects ovulation via a systemic rather than a local route, 2) disruption of the endometrial mucosa by curettage facilitated the absorption of OIF and increased the ovulatory effect of seminal plasma, and 3) ovulation in alpacas is not associated with a physical stimulation of the genital tract, and 4) the alpaca represents an excellent biological model to evaluate the bioactivity of OIF. BioMed Central 2005-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC1190216/ /pubmed/16018817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-3-29 Text en Copyright © 2005 Ratto et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Ratto, Marcelo H
Huanca, Wilfredo
Singh, Jaswant
Adams, Gregg P
Local versus systemic effect of ovulation-inducing factor in the seminal plasma of alpacas
title Local versus systemic effect of ovulation-inducing factor in the seminal plasma of alpacas
title_full Local versus systemic effect of ovulation-inducing factor in the seminal plasma of alpacas
title_fullStr Local versus systemic effect of ovulation-inducing factor in the seminal plasma of alpacas
title_full_unstemmed Local versus systemic effect of ovulation-inducing factor in the seminal plasma of alpacas
title_short Local versus systemic effect of ovulation-inducing factor in the seminal plasma of alpacas
title_sort local versus systemic effect of ovulation-inducing factor in the seminal plasma of alpacas
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1190216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16018817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-3-29
work_keys_str_mv AT rattomarceloh localversussystemiceffectofovulationinducingfactorintheseminalplasmaofalpacas
AT huancawilfredo localversussystemiceffectofovulationinducingfactorintheseminalplasmaofalpacas
AT singhjaswant localversussystemiceffectofovulationinducingfactorintheseminalplasmaofalpacas
AT adamsgreggp localversussystemiceffectofovulationinducingfactorintheseminalplasmaofalpacas