Cargando…

Spatiotemporal receptive field properties of epiretinally recorded spikes and local electroretinograms in cats

BACKGROUND: Receptive fields of retinal neural signals of different origin can be determined from extracellular microelectrode recordings at the inner retinal surface. However, locations and types of neural processes generating the different signal components are difficult to separate and identify....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilms, Marcus, Eckhorn, Reinhard
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1192803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16102171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-6-50
_version_ 1782124817060724736
author Wilms, Marcus
Eckhorn, Reinhard
author_facet Wilms, Marcus
Eckhorn, Reinhard
author_sort Wilms, Marcus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Receptive fields of retinal neural signals of different origin can be determined from extracellular microelectrode recordings at the inner retinal surface. However, locations and types of neural processes generating the different signal components are difficult to separate and identify. We here report epiretinal receptive fields (RFs) from simultaneously recorded spikes and local electroretinograms (LERGs) using a semi-chronic multi-electrode in vivo recording technique in cats. Broadband recordings were filtered to yield LERG and multi unit as well as single unit spike signals. RFs were calculated from responses to multifocal pseudo-random spatiotemporal visual stimuli registered at the retinal surface by a 7-electrode array. RESULTS: LERGs exhibit spatially unimodal RFs always centered at the location of the electrode tip. Spike-RFs are either congruent with LERG-RFs (N = 26/61) or shifted distally (N = 35/61) but never proximally with respect to the optic disk. LERG-RFs appear at shorter latencies (11.9 ms ± 0.5 ms, N = 18) than those of spikes (18.6 ms ± 0.4 ms, N = 53). Furthermore, OFF-center spike-RFs precede and have shorter response rise times than ON-center spike-RFs. Our results indicate that displaced spike-RFs result from action potentials of ganglion cell axons passing the recording electrode en route to the optic disk while LERG-RFs are related to superimposed postsynaptic potentials of cells near the electrode tip. CONCLUSION: Besides contributing to the understanding of retinal function we demonstrate the caveats that come with recordings from the retinal surface, i.e., the likelihood of recordings from mixed sets of retinal neurons. Implications for the design of an epiretinal visual implant are discussed.
format Text
id pubmed-1192803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-11928032005-08-27 Spatiotemporal receptive field properties of epiretinally recorded spikes and local electroretinograms in cats Wilms, Marcus Eckhorn, Reinhard BMC Neurosci Research Article BACKGROUND: Receptive fields of retinal neural signals of different origin can be determined from extracellular microelectrode recordings at the inner retinal surface. However, locations and types of neural processes generating the different signal components are difficult to separate and identify. We here report epiretinal receptive fields (RFs) from simultaneously recorded spikes and local electroretinograms (LERGs) using a semi-chronic multi-electrode in vivo recording technique in cats. Broadband recordings were filtered to yield LERG and multi unit as well as single unit spike signals. RFs were calculated from responses to multifocal pseudo-random spatiotemporal visual stimuli registered at the retinal surface by a 7-electrode array. RESULTS: LERGs exhibit spatially unimodal RFs always centered at the location of the electrode tip. Spike-RFs are either congruent with LERG-RFs (N = 26/61) or shifted distally (N = 35/61) but never proximally with respect to the optic disk. LERG-RFs appear at shorter latencies (11.9 ms ± 0.5 ms, N = 18) than those of spikes (18.6 ms ± 0.4 ms, N = 53). Furthermore, OFF-center spike-RFs precede and have shorter response rise times than ON-center spike-RFs. Our results indicate that displaced spike-RFs result from action potentials of ganglion cell axons passing the recording electrode en route to the optic disk while LERG-RFs are related to superimposed postsynaptic potentials of cells near the electrode tip. CONCLUSION: Besides contributing to the understanding of retinal function we demonstrate the caveats that come with recordings from the retinal surface, i.e., the likelihood of recordings from mixed sets of retinal neurons. Implications for the design of an epiretinal visual implant are discussed. BioMed Central 2005-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC1192803/ /pubmed/16102171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-6-50 Text en Copyright © 2005 Wilms and Eckhorn; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wilms, Marcus
Eckhorn, Reinhard
Spatiotemporal receptive field properties of epiretinally recorded spikes and local electroretinograms in cats
title Spatiotemporal receptive field properties of epiretinally recorded spikes and local electroretinograms in cats
title_full Spatiotemporal receptive field properties of epiretinally recorded spikes and local electroretinograms in cats
title_fullStr Spatiotemporal receptive field properties of epiretinally recorded spikes and local electroretinograms in cats
title_full_unstemmed Spatiotemporal receptive field properties of epiretinally recorded spikes and local electroretinograms in cats
title_short Spatiotemporal receptive field properties of epiretinally recorded spikes and local electroretinograms in cats
title_sort spatiotemporal receptive field properties of epiretinally recorded spikes and local electroretinograms in cats
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1192803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16102171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-6-50
work_keys_str_mv AT wilmsmarcus spatiotemporalreceptivefieldpropertiesofepiretinallyrecordedspikesandlocalelectroretinogramsincats
AT eckhornreinhard spatiotemporalreceptivefieldpropertiesofepiretinallyrecordedspikesandlocalelectroretinogramsincats