Cargando…

An Australian childhood obesity summit: the role of data and evidence in 'public' policy making

BACKGROUND: Overweight and obesity in Australia has risen at an alarming rate over the last 20 years as in other industrialised countries around the world, yet the policy response, locally and globally, has been limited. Using a childhood obesity summit held in Australia in 2002 as a case study, thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: SA, Nathan, E, Develin, N, Grove, AB, Zwi
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1198217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16029512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-2-17
_version_ 1782124855527735296
author SA, Nathan
E, Develin
N, Grove
AB, Zwi
author_facet SA, Nathan
E, Develin
N, Grove
AB, Zwi
author_sort SA, Nathan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Overweight and obesity in Australia has risen at an alarming rate over the last 20 years as in other industrialised countries around the world, yet the policy response, locally and globally, has been limited. Using a childhood obesity summit held in Australia in 2002 as a case study, this paper examines how evidence was used in setting the agenda, influencing the Summit debate and shaping the policy responses which emerged. The study used multiple methods of data collection including documentary analysis, key informant interviews, a focus group discussion and media analysis. The resulting data were content analysed to examine the types of evidence used in the Summit and how the state of the evidence base contributed to policy-making. RESULTS: Empirical research evidence concerning the magnitude of the problem was widely reported and largely uncontested in the media and in the Summit debates. In contrast, the evidence base for action was mostly opinion and ideas as empirical data was lacking. Opinions and ideas were generally found to be an acceptable basis for agreeing policy action coupled with thorough evaluation. However, the analysis revealed that the evidence was fiercely contested around food advertising to children and action agreed was therefore limited. CONCLUSION: The Summit demonstrated that policy action will move forward in the absence of strong research evidence. Where powerful and competing groups contest possible policy options, however, the evidence base required for action needs to be substantial. As with tobacco control, obesity control efforts are likely to face ongoing challenges around the nature of the evidence and interventions proposed to tackle the problem. Overcoming the challenges in controlling obesity will be more likely if researchers and public health advocates enhance their understanding of the policy process, including the role different types of evidence can play in influencing public debate and policy decisions, the interests and tactics of the different stakeholders involved and the part that can be played by time-limited yet high profile events such as Summits.
format Text
id pubmed-1198217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-11982172005-09-03 An Australian childhood obesity summit: the role of data and evidence in 'public' policy making SA, Nathan E, Develin N, Grove AB, Zwi Aust New Zealand Health Policy Research BACKGROUND: Overweight and obesity in Australia has risen at an alarming rate over the last 20 years as in other industrialised countries around the world, yet the policy response, locally and globally, has been limited. Using a childhood obesity summit held in Australia in 2002 as a case study, this paper examines how evidence was used in setting the agenda, influencing the Summit debate and shaping the policy responses which emerged. The study used multiple methods of data collection including documentary analysis, key informant interviews, a focus group discussion and media analysis. The resulting data were content analysed to examine the types of evidence used in the Summit and how the state of the evidence base contributed to policy-making. RESULTS: Empirical research evidence concerning the magnitude of the problem was widely reported and largely uncontested in the media and in the Summit debates. In contrast, the evidence base for action was mostly opinion and ideas as empirical data was lacking. Opinions and ideas were generally found to be an acceptable basis for agreeing policy action coupled with thorough evaluation. However, the analysis revealed that the evidence was fiercely contested around food advertising to children and action agreed was therefore limited. CONCLUSION: The Summit demonstrated that policy action will move forward in the absence of strong research evidence. Where powerful and competing groups contest possible policy options, however, the evidence base required for action needs to be substantial. As with tobacco control, obesity control efforts are likely to face ongoing challenges around the nature of the evidence and interventions proposed to tackle the problem. Overcoming the challenges in controlling obesity will be more likely if researchers and public health advocates enhance their understanding of the policy process, including the role different types of evidence can play in influencing public debate and policy decisions, the interests and tactics of the different stakeholders involved and the part that can be played by time-limited yet high profile events such as Summits. BioMed Central 2005-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC1198217/ /pubmed/16029512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-2-17 Text en Copyright © 2005 SA et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
SA, Nathan
E, Develin
N, Grove
AB, Zwi
An Australian childhood obesity summit: the role of data and evidence in 'public' policy making
title An Australian childhood obesity summit: the role of data and evidence in 'public' policy making
title_full An Australian childhood obesity summit: the role of data and evidence in 'public' policy making
title_fullStr An Australian childhood obesity summit: the role of data and evidence in 'public' policy making
title_full_unstemmed An Australian childhood obesity summit: the role of data and evidence in 'public' policy making
title_short An Australian childhood obesity summit: the role of data and evidence in 'public' policy making
title_sort australian childhood obesity summit: the role of data and evidence in 'public' policy making
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1198217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16029512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-2-17
work_keys_str_mv AT sanathan anaustralianchildhoodobesitysummittheroleofdataandevidenceinpublicpolicymaking
AT edevelin anaustralianchildhoodobesitysummittheroleofdataandevidenceinpublicpolicymaking
AT ngrove anaustralianchildhoodobesitysummittheroleofdataandevidenceinpublicpolicymaking
AT abzwi anaustralianchildhoodobesitysummittheroleofdataandevidenceinpublicpolicymaking
AT sanathan australianchildhoodobesitysummittheroleofdataandevidenceinpublicpolicymaking
AT edevelin australianchildhoodobesitysummittheroleofdataandevidenceinpublicpolicymaking
AT ngrove australianchildhoodobesitysummittheroleofdataandevidenceinpublicpolicymaking
AT abzwi australianchildhoodobesitysummittheroleofdataandevidenceinpublicpolicymaking