Cargando…
Matrix attachment regions as targets for retroviral integration
BACKGROUND: The randomness of retroviral integration has been debated for many years. Recent evidence indicates that integration site selection is not random, and that it is influenced by both viral and cellular factors. To study the role of DNA structure in site selection, retroviral integration ne...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1198263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16111492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-2-68 |
_version_ | 1782124867441655808 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, Chassidy N Levy, Laura S |
author_facet | Johnson, Chassidy N Levy, Laura S |
author_sort | Johnson, Chassidy N |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The randomness of retroviral integration has been debated for many years. Recent evidence indicates that integration site selection is not random, and that it is influenced by both viral and cellular factors. To study the role of DNA structure in site selection, retroviral integration near matrix attachment regions (MARs) was analyzed for three different groups of retroviruses. The objective was to assess whether integration near MARs may be a factor for integration site selection. RESULTS: Results indicated that MLV, SL3-3 MuLV, HIV-1 and HTLV-1 integrate preferentially near MARs, specifically within 2-kilobases (kb). In addition, a preferential position and orientation relative to the adjacent MAR was observed for each virus. Further analysis of SL3-3 MuLV insertions in common integration sites (CISs) demonstrated a higher frequency of integration near MARs and an orientation preference that was not observed for integrations outside CISs. CONCLUSION: These findings contribute to a growing body of evidence indicating that retroviral integration is not random, that MARs influence integration site selection for some retroviruses, and that integration near MARs may have a role in the insertional activation of oncogenes by gammaretroviruses. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1198263 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-11982632005-09-03 Matrix attachment regions as targets for retroviral integration Johnson, Chassidy N Levy, Laura S Virol J Research BACKGROUND: The randomness of retroviral integration has been debated for many years. Recent evidence indicates that integration site selection is not random, and that it is influenced by both viral and cellular factors. To study the role of DNA structure in site selection, retroviral integration near matrix attachment regions (MARs) was analyzed for three different groups of retroviruses. The objective was to assess whether integration near MARs may be a factor for integration site selection. RESULTS: Results indicated that MLV, SL3-3 MuLV, HIV-1 and HTLV-1 integrate preferentially near MARs, specifically within 2-kilobases (kb). In addition, a preferential position and orientation relative to the adjacent MAR was observed for each virus. Further analysis of SL3-3 MuLV insertions in common integration sites (CISs) demonstrated a higher frequency of integration near MARs and an orientation preference that was not observed for integrations outside CISs. CONCLUSION: These findings contribute to a growing body of evidence indicating that retroviral integration is not random, that MARs influence integration site selection for some retroviruses, and that integration near MARs may have a role in the insertional activation of oncogenes by gammaretroviruses. BioMed Central 2005-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC1198263/ /pubmed/16111492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-2-68 Text en Copyright © 2005 Johnson and Levy; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Johnson, Chassidy N Levy, Laura S Matrix attachment regions as targets for retroviral integration |
title | Matrix attachment regions as targets for retroviral integration |
title_full | Matrix attachment regions as targets for retroviral integration |
title_fullStr | Matrix attachment regions as targets for retroviral integration |
title_full_unstemmed | Matrix attachment regions as targets for retroviral integration |
title_short | Matrix attachment regions as targets for retroviral integration |
title_sort | matrix attachment regions as targets for retroviral integration |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1198263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16111492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-2-68 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsonchassidyn matrixattachmentregionsastargetsforretroviralintegration AT levylauras matrixattachmentregionsastargetsforretroviralintegration |