Cargando…

Effectiveness of different methods of health education: A comparative assessment in a scientific conference

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Every individual mode of health education has its own merits, drawbacks as well as their own sphere of effectiveness. A specific mode of communication is more useful in a specific setting on a specific group than others. To search for optimum mode of communication for a specifi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saha, Asim, Poddar, Era, Mankad, Minal
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1199606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16111502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-5-88
_version_ 1782124878337409024
author Saha, Asim
Poddar, Era
Mankad, Minal
author_facet Saha, Asim
Poddar, Era
Mankad, Minal
author_sort Saha, Asim
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Every individual mode of health education has its own merits, drawbacks as well as their own sphere of effectiveness. A specific mode of communication is more useful in a specific setting on a specific group than others. To search for optimum mode of communication for a specific audience is a major area of research in health education. The issue of imparting health education to a gathering of educated people, representing different fields of knowledge has remained a relatively less lighted aspect of health education research. In this backdrop this study was initiated for making a comparative assessment of different methods of dissemination of health education among educated people. METHODS: A cross-sectional interviewer administered questionnaire survey was conducted involving 142 randomly selected subjects during the last session of a five-day conference having health as main theme when the opinion of the delegates regarding different communication methods was asked for. Collected data was analyzed not only to find out the optimum mode of education dissemination in such a setting but also to find the contribution of different factors in the preferences of the study subjects. RESULTS: The participants opted more (60%) for focused programs of smaller audience (sectional program). In both broad area (main program) and focused area programs (sectional), the participants preferred lectures (62% and 65.7% respectively). Specific topics were preferred both in lectures (67.6%) and symposia (57.7%). In the exhibition, exhibits seemed to be more attractive (62%) than the posters. Qualification has emerged to be a contributing factor in peoples' choice towards sectional programme and also in their affinity to symposia. Increased age was a significant contributor in participants' preference towards specific topics. Physical barriers of communication appeared to be a problem in the main program as well as in the exhibition. Lack of coherence among the speakers was reported (69%) to be a major reason for which symposia was not preferred. CONCLUSION: This study concluded that while planning for health education dissemination in an educated group a focused programme should be formulated in small groups preferably in the form of lectures on specific topics, more so while dealing with participants of higher age group having higher educational qualification.
format Text
id pubmed-1199606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-11996062005-09-09 Effectiveness of different methods of health education: A comparative assessment in a scientific conference Saha, Asim Poddar, Era Mankad, Minal BMC Public Health Research Article ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Every individual mode of health education has its own merits, drawbacks as well as their own sphere of effectiveness. A specific mode of communication is more useful in a specific setting on a specific group than others. To search for optimum mode of communication for a specific audience is a major area of research in health education. The issue of imparting health education to a gathering of educated people, representing different fields of knowledge has remained a relatively less lighted aspect of health education research. In this backdrop this study was initiated for making a comparative assessment of different methods of dissemination of health education among educated people. METHODS: A cross-sectional interviewer administered questionnaire survey was conducted involving 142 randomly selected subjects during the last session of a five-day conference having health as main theme when the opinion of the delegates regarding different communication methods was asked for. Collected data was analyzed not only to find out the optimum mode of education dissemination in such a setting but also to find the contribution of different factors in the preferences of the study subjects. RESULTS: The participants opted more (60%) for focused programs of smaller audience (sectional program). In both broad area (main program) and focused area programs (sectional), the participants preferred lectures (62% and 65.7% respectively). Specific topics were preferred both in lectures (67.6%) and symposia (57.7%). In the exhibition, exhibits seemed to be more attractive (62%) than the posters. Qualification has emerged to be a contributing factor in peoples' choice towards sectional programme and also in their affinity to symposia. Increased age was a significant contributor in participants' preference towards specific topics. Physical barriers of communication appeared to be a problem in the main program as well as in the exhibition. Lack of coherence among the speakers was reported (69%) to be a major reason for which symposia was not preferred. CONCLUSION: This study concluded that while planning for health education dissemination in an educated group a focused programme should be formulated in small groups preferably in the form of lectures on specific topics, more so while dealing with participants of higher age group having higher educational qualification. BioMed Central 2005-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC1199606/ /pubmed/16111502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-5-88 Text en Copyright © 2005 Saha et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Saha, Asim
Poddar, Era
Mankad, Minal
Effectiveness of different methods of health education: A comparative assessment in a scientific conference
title Effectiveness of different methods of health education: A comparative assessment in a scientific conference
title_full Effectiveness of different methods of health education: A comparative assessment in a scientific conference
title_fullStr Effectiveness of different methods of health education: A comparative assessment in a scientific conference
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of different methods of health education: A comparative assessment in a scientific conference
title_short Effectiveness of different methods of health education: A comparative assessment in a scientific conference
title_sort effectiveness of different methods of health education: a comparative assessment in a scientific conference
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1199606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16111502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-5-88
work_keys_str_mv AT sahaasim effectivenessofdifferentmethodsofhealtheducationacomparativeassessmentinascientificconference
AT poddarera effectivenessofdifferentmethodsofhealtheducationacomparativeassessmentinascientificconference
AT mankadminal effectivenessofdifferentmethodsofhealtheducationacomparativeassessmentinascientificconference