Cargando…

DNA index determination with Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) in Barrett's esophagus: Comparison with CAS 200

BACKGROUND: For solid tumors, image cytometry has been shown to be more sensitive for diagnosing DNA content abnormalities (aneuploidy) than flow cytometry. Image cytometry has often been performed using the semi-automated CAS 200 system. Recently, an Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) was int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Qin, Yu, Chenggong, Klein, Michael, Fang, James, Goyal, Raj K
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1201134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16095543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6890-5-7
_version_ 1782124889414565888
author Huang, Qin
Yu, Chenggong
Klein, Michael
Fang, James
Goyal, Raj K
author_facet Huang, Qin
Yu, Chenggong
Klein, Michael
Fang, James
Goyal, Raj K
author_sort Huang, Qin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For solid tumors, image cytometry has been shown to be more sensitive for diagnosing DNA content abnormalities (aneuploidy) than flow cytometry. Image cytometry has often been performed using the semi-automated CAS 200 system. Recently, an Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) was introduced to determine DNA content (DNA index), but it has not been validated. METHODS: Using the CAS 200 system and ACIS, we compared the DNA index (DI) obtained from the same archived formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded tissue samples from Barrett's esophagus related lesions, including samples with specialized intestinal metaplasia without dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: Although there was a very good correlation between the DI values determined by ACIS and CAS 200, the former was 25% more sensitive in detecting aneuploidy. ACIS yielded a mean DI value 18% higher than that obtained by CAS 200 (p < 0.001; paired t test). In addition, the average time required to perform a DNA ploidy analysis was shorter with the ACIS (30–40 min) than with the CAS 200 (40–70 min). Results obtained by ACIS gave excellent inter-and intra-observer variability (coefficient of correlation >0.9 for both, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Compared with the CAS 200, the ACIS is a more sensitive and less time consuming technique for determining DNA ploidy. Results obtained by ACIS are also highly reproducible.
format Text
id pubmed-1201134
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-12011342005-09-10 DNA index determination with Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) in Barrett's esophagus: Comparison with CAS 200 Huang, Qin Yu, Chenggong Klein, Michael Fang, James Goyal, Raj K BMC Clin Pathol Technical Advance BACKGROUND: For solid tumors, image cytometry has been shown to be more sensitive for diagnosing DNA content abnormalities (aneuploidy) than flow cytometry. Image cytometry has often been performed using the semi-automated CAS 200 system. Recently, an Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) was introduced to determine DNA content (DNA index), but it has not been validated. METHODS: Using the CAS 200 system and ACIS, we compared the DNA index (DI) obtained from the same archived formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded tissue samples from Barrett's esophagus related lesions, including samples with specialized intestinal metaplasia without dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: Although there was a very good correlation between the DI values determined by ACIS and CAS 200, the former was 25% more sensitive in detecting aneuploidy. ACIS yielded a mean DI value 18% higher than that obtained by CAS 200 (p < 0.001; paired t test). In addition, the average time required to perform a DNA ploidy analysis was shorter with the ACIS (30–40 min) than with the CAS 200 (40–70 min). Results obtained by ACIS gave excellent inter-and intra-observer variability (coefficient of correlation >0.9 for both, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Compared with the CAS 200, the ACIS is a more sensitive and less time consuming technique for determining DNA ploidy. Results obtained by ACIS are also highly reproducible. BioMed Central 2005-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC1201134/ /pubmed/16095543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6890-5-7 Text en Copyright © 2005 Huang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Huang, Qin
Yu, Chenggong
Klein, Michael
Fang, James
Goyal, Raj K
DNA index determination with Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) in Barrett's esophagus: Comparison with CAS 200
title DNA index determination with Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) in Barrett's esophagus: Comparison with CAS 200
title_full DNA index determination with Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) in Barrett's esophagus: Comparison with CAS 200
title_fullStr DNA index determination with Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) in Barrett's esophagus: Comparison with CAS 200
title_full_unstemmed DNA index determination with Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) in Barrett's esophagus: Comparison with CAS 200
title_short DNA index determination with Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) in Barrett's esophagus: Comparison with CAS 200
title_sort dna index determination with automated cellular imaging system (acis) in barrett's esophagus: comparison with cas 200
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1201134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16095543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6890-5-7
work_keys_str_mv AT huangqin dnaindexdeterminationwithautomatedcellularimagingsystemacisinbarrettsesophaguscomparisonwithcas200
AT yuchenggong dnaindexdeterminationwithautomatedcellularimagingsystemacisinbarrettsesophaguscomparisonwithcas200
AT kleinmichael dnaindexdeterminationwithautomatedcellularimagingsystemacisinbarrettsesophaguscomparisonwithcas200
AT fangjames dnaindexdeterminationwithautomatedcellularimagingsystemacisinbarrettsesophaguscomparisonwithcas200
AT goyalrajk dnaindexdeterminationwithautomatedcellularimagingsystemacisinbarrettsesophaguscomparisonwithcas200