Cargando…
DNA index determination with Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) in Barrett's esophagus: Comparison with CAS 200
BACKGROUND: For solid tumors, image cytometry has been shown to be more sensitive for diagnosing DNA content abnormalities (aneuploidy) than flow cytometry. Image cytometry has often been performed using the semi-automated CAS 200 system. Recently, an Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) was int...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1201134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16095543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6890-5-7 |
_version_ | 1782124889414565888 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Qin Yu, Chenggong Klein, Michael Fang, James Goyal, Raj K |
author_facet | Huang, Qin Yu, Chenggong Klein, Michael Fang, James Goyal, Raj K |
author_sort | Huang, Qin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: For solid tumors, image cytometry has been shown to be more sensitive for diagnosing DNA content abnormalities (aneuploidy) than flow cytometry. Image cytometry has often been performed using the semi-automated CAS 200 system. Recently, an Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) was introduced to determine DNA content (DNA index), but it has not been validated. METHODS: Using the CAS 200 system and ACIS, we compared the DNA index (DI) obtained from the same archived formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded tissue samples from Barrett's esophagus related lesions, including samples with specialized intestinal metaplasia without dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: Although there was a very good correlation between the DI values determined by ACIS and CAS 200, the former was 25% more sensitive in detecting aneuploidy. ACIS yielded a mean DI value 18% higher than that obtained by CAS 200 (p < 0.001; paired t test). In addition, the average time required to perform a DNA ploidy analysis was shorter with the ACIS (30–40 min) than with the CAS 200 (40–70 min). Results obtained by ACIS gave excellent inter-and intra-observer variability (coefficient of correlation >0.9 for both, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Compared with the CAS 200, the ACIS is a more sensitive and less time consuming technique for determining DNA ploidy. Results obtained by ACIS are also highly reproducible. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1201134 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-12011342005-09-10 DNA index determination with Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) in Barrett's esophagus: Comparison with CAS 200 Huang, Qin Yu, Chenggong Klein, Michael Fang, James Goyal, Raj K BMC Clin Pathol Technical Advance BACKGROUND: For solid tumors, image cytometry has been shown to be more sensitive for diagnosing DNA content abnormalities (aneuploidy) than flow cytometry. Image cytometry has often been performed using the semi-automated CAS 200 system. Recently, an Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) was introduced to determine DNA content (DNA index), but it has not been validated. METHODS: Using the CAS 200 system and ACIS, we compared the DNA index (DI) obtained from the same archived formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded tissue samples from Barrett's esophagus related lesions, including samples with specialized intestinal metaplasia without dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: Although there was a very good correlation between the DI values determined by ACIS and CAS 200, the former was 25% more sensitive in detecting aneuploidy. ACIS yielded a mean DI value 18% higher than that obtained by CAS 200 (p < 0.001; paired t test). In addition, the average time required to perform a DNA ploidy analysis was shorter with the ACIS (30–40 min) than with the CAS 200 (40–70 min). Results obtained by ACIS gave excellent inter-and intra-observer variability (coefficient of correlation >0.9 for both, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Compared with the CAS 200, the ACIS is a more sensitive and less time consuming technique for determining DNA ploidy. Results obtained by ACIS are also highly reproducible. BioMed Central 2005-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC1201134/ /pubmed/16095543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6890-5-7 Text en Copyright © 2005 Huang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Advance Huang, Qin Yu, Chenggong Klein, Michael Fang, James Goyal, Raj K DNA index determination with Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) in Barrett's esophagus: Comparison with CAS 200 |
title | DNA index determination with Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) in Barrett's esophagus: Comparison with CAS 200 |
title_full | DNA index determination with Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) in Barrett's esophagus: Comparison with CAS 200 |
title_fullStr | DNA index determination with Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) in Barrett's esophagus: Comparison with CAS 200 |
title_full_unstemmed | DNA index determination with Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) in Barrett's esophagus: Comparison with CAS 200 |
title_short | DNA index determination with Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS) in Barrett's esophagus: Comparison with CAS 200 |
title_sort | dna index determination with automated cellular imaging system (acis) in barrett's esophagus: comparison with cas 200 |
topic | Technical Advance |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1201134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16095543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6890-5-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangqin dnaindexdeterminationwithautomatedcellularimagingsystemacisinbarrettsesophaguscomparisonwithcas200 AT yuchenggong dnaindexdeterminationwithautomatedcellularimagingsystemacisinbarrettsesophaguscomparisonwithcas200 AT kleinmichael dnaindexdeterminationwithautomatedcellularimagingsystemacisinbarrettsesophaguscomparisonwithcas200 AT fangjames dnaindexdeterminationwithautomatedcellularimagingsystemacisinbarrettsesophaguscomparisonwithcas200 AT goyalrajk dnaindexdeterminationwithautomatedcellularimagingsystemacisinbarrettsesophaguscomparisonwithcas200 |