Cargando…

Knee disorders in primary care: design and patient selection of the HONEUR knee cohort

BACKGROUND: Knee complaints are a frequent reason for consultation in general practice. These patients constitute a specific population compared to secondary care patients. However, information to base treatment decisions on is generally derived from specialistic settings. Our cohort study is aimed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heintjes, Edith M, Berger, Marjolein Y, Koes, Bart W, Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1208897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16117830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-6-45
_version_ 1782124927646695424
author Heintjes, Edith M
Berger, Marjolein Y
Koes, Bart W
Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M
author_facet Heintjes, Edith M
Berger, Marjolein Y
Koes, Bart W
Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M
author_sort Heintjes, Edith M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Knee complaints are a frequent reason for consultation in general practice. These patients constitute a specific population compared to secondary care patients. However, information to base treatment decisions on is generally derived from specialistic settings. Our cohort study is aimed at collecting knowledge about prognosis and prognostic factors of knee complaints presented in a primary care setting. This paper describes the methods used for data collection, and discusses potential selectiveness of patient recruitment. METHODS: This is a descriptive prospective cohort study with one-year follow-up. 40 Dutch GPs recruited consecutive patients with incident knee complaints aged 12 years and above from October 2001 to October 2003. Patients were assessed with questionnaires and standardised physical examinations. Additional measurements of subgroups included MRI for recent knee traumas and device assessed function measurements for non-traumatic patients. After the inclusion period we retrospectively searched the computerized medical files of participating GPs to obtain a sample to determine possible selective recruitment. We assessed differences in proportions of gender, traumatic onset of injury and age groups between participants and non-participants using Odds Ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: We recruited 1068 patients. In a sample of 310 patients visiting the GP, we detected some selective recruitment, indicating an underrepresentation of patients aged 12 to 35 years (OR 1.70; 1.15–2.77), especially among men (OR 2.16; 1.12–4.18). The underrepresentation of patients with traumatic onset of injury was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This cohort is unique in its size, setting, and its range of both age and type of knee complaints. We believe the detected selective recruitment is unlikely to introduce significant bias, as the cohort will be divided into subgroups according to age group or traumatic onset of injury for future analyses. However, the underrepresentation of men in the age group of 12 to 35 years of age warrants caution. Based on the available data, we believe our cohort is an acceptable representation of patients with new knee complaints consulting the GP, and we expect no problems with extrapolation of the results to the general Dutch population.
format Text
id pubmed-1208897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-12088972005-09-15 Knee disorders in primary care: design and patient selection of the HONEUR knee cohort Heintjes, Edith M Berger, Marjolein Y Koes, Bart W Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Knee complaints are a frequent reason for consultation in general practice. These patients constitute a specific population compared to secondary care patients. However, information to base treatment decisions on is generally derived from specialistic settings. Our cohort study is aimed at collecting knowledge about prognosis and prognostic factors of knee complaints presented in a primary care setting. This paper describes the methods used for data collection, and discusses potential selectiveness of patient recruitment. METHODS: This is a descriptive prospective cohort study with one-year follow-up. 40 Dutch GPs recruited consecutive patients with incident knee complaints aged 12 years and above from October 2001 to October 2003. Patients were assessed with questionnaires and standardised physical examinations. Additional measurements of subgroups included MRI for recent knee traumas and device assessed function measurements for non-traumatic patients. After the inclusion period we retrospectively searched the computerized medical files of participating GPs to obtain a sample to determine possible selective recruitment. We assessed differences in proportions of gender, traumatic onset of injury and age groups between participants and non-participants using Odds Ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: We recruited 1068 patients. In a sample of 310 patients visiting the GP, we detected some selective recruitment, indicating an underrepresentation of patients aged 12 to 35 years (OR 1.70; 1.15–2.77), especially among men (OR 2.16; 1.12–4.18). The underrepresentation of patients with traumatic onset of injury was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This cohort is unique in its size, setting, and its range of both age and type of knee complaints. We believe the detected selective recruitment is unlikely to introduce significant bias, as the cohort will be divided into subgroups according to age group or traumatic onset of injury for future analyses. However, the underrepresentation of men in the age group of 12 to 35 years of age warrants caution. Based on the available data, we believe our cohort is an acceptable representation of patients with new knee complaints consulting the GP, and we expect no problems with extrapolation of the results to the general Dutch population. BioMed Central 2005-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC1208897/ /pubmed/16117830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-6-45 Text en Copyright © 2005 Heintjes et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Heintjes, Edith M
Berger, Marjolein Y
Koes, Bart W
Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M
Knee disorders in primary care: design and patient selection of the HONEUR knee cohort
title Knee disorders in primary care: design and patient selection of the HONEUR knee cohort
title_full Knee disorders in primary care: design and patient selection of the HONEUR knee cohort
title_fullStr Knee disorders in primary care: design and patient selection of the HONEUR knee cohort
title_full_unstemmed Knee disorders in primary care: design and patient selection of the HONEUR knee cohort
title_short Knee disorders in primary care: design and patient selection of the HONEUR knee cohort
title_sort knee disorders in primary care: design and patient selection of the honeur knee cohort
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1208897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16117830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-6-45
work_keys_str_mv AT heintjesedithm kneedisordersinprimarycaredesignandpatientselectionofthehoneurkneecohort
AT bergermarjoleiny kneedisordersinprimarycaredesignandpatientselectionofthehoneurkneecohort
AT koesbartw kneedisordersinprimarycaredesignandpatientselectionofthehoneurkneecohort
AT biermazeinstrasitam kneedisordersinprimarycaredesignandpatientselectionofthehoneurkneecohort