Cargando…

Subluxation: dogma or science?

Subluxation syndrome is a legitimate, potentially testable, theoretical construct for which there is little experimental evidence. Acceptable as hypothesis, the widespread assertion of the clinical meaningfulness of this notion brings ridicule from the scientific and health care communities and conf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keating, Joseph C, Charlton, Keith H, Grod, Jaroslaw P, Perle, Stephen M, Sikorski, David, Winterstein, James F
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1208927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16092955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-13-17
_version_ 1782124935581270016
author Keating, Joseph C
Charlton, Keith H
Grod, Jaroslaw P
Perle, Stephen M
Sikorski, David
Winterstein, James F
author_facet Keating, Joseph C
Charlton, Keith H
Grod, Jaroslaw P
Perle, Stephen M
Sikorski, David
Winterstein, James F
author_sort Keating, Joseph C
collection PubMed
description Subluxation syndrome is a legitimate, potentially testable, theoretical construct for which there is little experimental evidence. Acceptable as hypothesis, the widespread assertion of the clinical meaningfulness of this notion brings ridicule from the scientific and health care communities and confusion within the chiropractic profession. We believe that an evidence-orientation among chiropractors requires that we distinguish between subluxation dogma vs. subluxation as the potential focus of clinical research. We lament efforts to generate unity within the profession through consensus statements concerning subluxation dogma, and believe that cultural authority will continue to elude us so long as we assert dogma as though it were validated clinical theory.
format Text
id pubmed-1208927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-12089272005-09-15 Subluxation: dogma or science? Keating, Joseph C Charlton, Keith H Grod, Jaroslaw P Perle, Stephen M Sikorski, David Winterstein, James F Chiropr Osteopat Debate Subluxation syndrome is a legitimate, potentially testable, theoretical construct for which there is little experimental evidence. Acceptable as hypothesis, the widespread assertion of the clinical meaningfulness of this notion brings ridicule from the scientific and health care communities and confusion within the chiropractic profession. We believe that an evidence-orientation among chiropractors requires that we distinguish between subluxation dogma vs. subluxation as the potential focus of clinical research. We lament efforts to generate unity within the profession through consensus statements concerning subluxation dogma, and believe that cultural authority will continue to elude us so long as we assert dogma as though it were validated clinical theory. BioMed Central 2005-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC1208927/ /pubmed/16092955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-13-17 Text en Copyright © 2005 Keating et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Debate
Keating, Joseph C
Charlton, Keith H
Grod, Jaroslaw P
Perle, Stephen M
Sikorski, David
Winterstein, James F
Subluxation: dogma or science?
title Subluxation: dogma or science?
title_full Subluxation: dogma or science?
title_fullStr Subluxation: dogma or science?
title_full_unstemmed Subluxation: dogma or science?
title_short Subluxation: dogma or science?
title_sort subluxation: dogma or science?
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1208927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16092955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-13-17
work_keys_str_mv AT keatingjosephc subluxationdogmaorscience
AT charltonkeithh subluxationdogmaorscience
AT grodjaroslawp subluxationdogmaorscience
AT perlestephenm subluxationdogmaorscience
AT sikorskidavid subluxationdogmaorscience
AT wintersteinjamesf subluxationdogmaorscience