Cargando…
Subluxation: dogma or science?
Subluxation syndrome is a legitimate, potentially testable, theoretical construct for which there is little experimental evidence. Acceptable as hypothesis, the widespread assertion of the clinical meaningfulness of this notion brings ridicule from the scientific and health care communities and conf...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1208927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16092955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-13-17 |
_version_ | 1782124935581270016 |
---|---|
author | Keating, Joseph C Charlton, Keith H Grod, Jaroslaw P Perle, Stephen M Sikorski, David Winterstein, James F |
author_facet | Keating, Joseph C Charlton, Keith H Grod, Jaroslaw P Perle, Stephen M Sikorski, David Winterstein, James F |
author_sort | Keating, Joseph C |
collection | PubMed |
description | Subluxation syndrome is a legitimate, potentially testable, theoretical construct for which there is little experimental evidence. Acceptable as hypothesis, the widespread assertion of the clinical meaningfulness of this notion brings ridicule from the scientific and health care communities and confusion within the chiropractic profession. We believe that an evidence-orientation among chiropractors requires that we distinguish between subluxation dogma vs. subluxation as the potential focus of clinical research. We lament efforts to generate unity within the profession through consensus statements concerning subluxation dogma, and believe that cultural authority will continue to elude us so long as we assert dogma as though it were validated clinical theory. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1208927 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-12089272005-09-15 Subluxation: dogma or science? Keating, Joseph C Charlton, Keith H Grod, Jaroslaw P Perle, Stephen M Sikorski, David Winterstein, James F Chiropr Osteopat Debate Subluxation syndrome is a legitimate, potentially testable, theoretical construct for which there is little experimental evidence. Acceptable as hypothesis, the widespread assertion of the clinical meaningfulness of this notion brings ridicule from the scientific and health care communities and confusion within the chiropractic profession. We believe that an evidence-orientation among chiropractors requires that we distinguish between subluxation dogma vs. subluxation as the potential focus of clinical research. We lament efforts to generate unity within the profession through consensus statements concerning subluxation dogma, and believe that cultural authority will continue to elude us so long as we assert dogma as though it were validated clinical theory. BioMed Central 2005-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC1208927/ /pubmed/16092955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-13-17 Text en Copyright © 2005 Keating et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Debate Keating, Joseph C Charlton, Keith H Grod, Jaroslaw P Perle, Stephen M Sikorski, David Winterstein, James F Subluxation: dogma or science? |
title | Subluxation: dogma or science? |
title_full | Subluxation: dogma or science? |
title_fullStr | Subluxation: dogma or science? |
title_full_unstemmed | Subluxation: dogma or science? |
title_short | Subluxation: dogma or science? |
title_sort | subluxation: dogma or science? |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1208927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16092955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-13-17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT keatingjosephc subluxationdogmaorscience AT charltonkeithh subluxationdogmaorscience AT grodjaroslawp subluxationdogmaorscience AT perlestephenm subluxationdogmaorscience AT sikorskidavid subluxationdogmaorscience AT wintersteinjamesf subluxationdogmaorscience |