Cargando…
Does the Maxim “Once a Caesarean, Always a Caesarean” Still Hold True?
Ugwumadu discusses a new tool, reported in PLoS Medicine, that can help to predict the risks of Caesarean section and uterine rupture in women attempting vaginal birth after prior Caesarean section.
Autor principal: | Ugwumadu, Austin |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1236800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16173837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020305 |
Ejemplares similares
-
WHO’s Robson platform for data-sharing on caesarean section rates
por: Opiyo, Newton, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Variation in Caesarean Section Rates in the US: Outliers, Damned Outliers, and Statistics
por: Smith, Gordon C. S.
Publicado: (2014) -
Non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections: WHO recommendations
por: Opiyo, Newton, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Does the model of additive effect in placebo research still hold true? A narrative review
por: Boehm, Katja, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
“Too much, too late”: data on stillbirths to improve interpretation of caesarean section rates
por: Zethof, Siem, et al.
Publicado: (2022)