Cargando…

The "lipid accumulation product" performs better than the body mass index for recognizing cardiovascular risk: a population-based comparison

BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI, kg/m(2)) may not be the best marker for estimating the risk of obesity-related disease. Consistent with physiologic observations, an alternative index uses waist circumference (WC) and fasting triglycerides (TG) concentration to describe lipid overaccumulation. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kahn, Henry S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1236917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16150143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-5-26
_version_ 1782125008377610240
author Kahn, Henry S
author_facet Kahn, Henry S
author_sort Kahn, Henry S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI, kg/m(2)) may not be the best marker for estimating the risk of obesity-related disease. Consistent with physiologic observations, an alternative index uses waist circumference (WC) and fasting triglycerides (TG) concentration to describe lipid overaccumulation. METHODS: The WC (estimated population minimum 65 cm for men and 58 cm for women) and TG concentration from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (N = 9,180, statistically weighted to represent 100.05 million US adults) were used to compute a "lipid accumulation product" [LAP = (WC-65) × TG for men and (WC-58) × TG for women] and to describe the population distribution of LAP. LAP and BMI were compared as categorical variables and as log-transformed continuous variables for their ability to identify adverse levels of 11 cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: Nearly half of the represented population was discordant for their quartile assignments to LAP and BMI. When 23.54 million with ordinal LAP quartile > BMI quartile were compared with 25.36 million with ordinal BMI quartile > LAP quartile (regression models adjusted for race-ethnicity and sex) the former had more adverse risk levels than the latter (p < 0.002) for seven lipid variables, uric acid concentration, heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Further adjustment for age did not materially alter these comparisons except for blood pressures (p > 0.1). As continuous variables, LAP provided a consistently more adverse beta coefficient (slope) than BMI for nine cardiovascular risk variables (p < 0.01), but not for blood pressures (p > 0.2). CONCLUSION: LAP (describing lipid overaccumulation) performed better than BMI (describing weight overaccumulation) for identifying US adults at cardiovascular risk. Compared to BMI, LAP might better predict the incidence of cardiovascular disease, but this hypothesis needs prospective testing.
format Text
id pubmed-1236917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-12369172005-09-29 The "lipid accumulation product" performs better than the body mass index for recognizing cardiovascular risk: a population-based comparison Kahn, Henry S BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI, kg/m(2)) may not be the best marker for estimating the risk of obesity-related disease. Consistent with physiologic observations, an alternative index uses waist circumference (WC) and fasting triglycerides (TG) concentration to describe lipid overaccumulation. METHODS: The WC (estimated population minimum 65 cm for men and 58 cm for women) and TG concentration from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (N = 9,180, statistically weighted to represent 100.05 million US adults) were used to compute a "lipid accumulation product" [LAP = (WC-65) × TG for men and (WC-58) × TG for women] and to describe the population distribution of LAP. LAP and BMI were compared as categorical variables and as log-transformed continuous variables for their ability to identify adverse levels of 11 cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: Nearly half of the represented population was discordant for their quartile assignments to LAP and BMI. When 23.54 million with ordinal LAP quartile > BMI quartile were compared with 25.36 million with ordinal BMI quartile > LAP quartile (regression models adjusted for race-ethnicity and sex) the former had more adverse risk levels than the latter (p < 0.002) for seven lipid variables, uric acid concentration, heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Further adjustment for age did not materially alter these comparisons except for blood pressures (p > 0.1). As continuous variables, LAP provided a consistently more adverse beta coefficient (slope) than BMI for nine cardiovascular risk variables (p < 0.01), but not for blood pressures (p > 0.2). CONCLUSION: LAP (describing lipid overaccumulation) performed better than BMI (describing weight overaccumulation) for identifying US adults at cardiovascular risk. Compared to BMI, LAP might better predict the incidence of cardiovascular disease, but this hypothesis needs prospective testing. BioMed Central 2005-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC1236917/ /pubmed/16150143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-5-26 Text en Copyright © 2005 Kahn; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kahn, Henry S
The "lipid accumulation product" performs better than the body mass index for recognizing cardiovascular risk: a population-based comparison
title The "lipid accumulation product" performs better than the body mass index for recognizing cardiovascular risk: a population-based comparison
title_full The "lipid accumulation product" performs better than the body mass index for recognizing cardiovascular risk: a population-based comparison
title_fullStr The "lipid accumulation product" performs better than the body mass index for recognizing cardiovascular risk: a population-based comparison
title_full_unstemmed The "lipid accumulation product" performs better than the body mass index for recognizing cardiovascular risk: a population-based comparison
title_short The "lipid accumulation product" performs better than the body mass index for recognizing cardiovascular risk: a population-based comparison
title_sort "lipid accumulation product" performs better than the body mass index for recognizing cardiovascular risk: a population-based comparison
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1236917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16150143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-5-26
work_keys_str_mv AT kahnhenrys thelipidaccumulationproductperformsbetterthanthebodymassindexforrecognizingcardiovascularriskapopulationbasedcomparison
AT kahnhenrys lipidaccumulationproductperformsbetterthanthebodymassindexforrecognizingcardiovascularriskapopulationbasedcomparison