Cargando…

Pfiesteria: review of the science and identification of research gaps. Report for the National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In connection with the CDC National Conference on Pfiesteria, a multidisciplinary panel evaluated Pfiesteria-related research. The panel set out what was known and what was not known about adverse effects of the organism on estuarine ecology, fish, and human health; assessed the methods used in Pfie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Samet, J, Bignami, G S, Feldman, R, Hawkins, W, Neff, J, Smayda, T
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1240594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11687383
_version_ 1782125177172131840
author Samet, J
Bignami, G S
Feldman, R
Hawkins, W
Neff, J
Smayda, T
author_facet Samet, J
Bignami, G S
Feldman, R
Hawkins, W
Neff, J
Smayda, T
author_sort Samet, J
collection PubMed
description In connection with the CDC National Conference on Pfiesteria, a multidisciplinary panel evaluated Pfiesteria-related research. The panel set out what was known and what was not known about adverse effects of the organism on estuarine ecology, fish, and human health; assessed the methods used in Pfiesteria research; and offered suggestions to address data gaps. The panel's expertise covered dinoflagellate ecology; fish pathology and toxicology; laboratory measurement of toxins, epidemiology, and neurology. The panel evaluated peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed literature available through June 2000 in a systematic conceptual framework that moved from the source of exposure, through exposure research and dose, to human health effects. Substantial uncertainties remain throughout the conceptual framework the panel used to guide its evaluation. Firm evidence demonstrates that Pfiesteria is toxic to fish, but the specific toxin has not been isolated or characterized. Laboratory and field evidence indicate that the organism has a complex life cycle. The consequences of human exposure to Pfiesteria toxin and the magnitude of the human health problem remain obscure. The patchwork of approaches used in clinical evaluation and surrogate measures of exposure to the toxin are major limitations of this work. To protect public health, the panel suggests that priority be given research that will provide better insight into the effects of Pfiesteria on human health. Key gaps include the identity and mechanism of action of the toxin(s), the incomplete description of effects of exposure in invertebrates, fish, and humans, and the nature and extent of exposures that place people at risk.
format Text
id pubmed-1240594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-12405942005-11-08 Pfiesteria: review of the science and identification of research gaps. Report for the National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Samet, J Bignami, G S Feldman, R Hawkins, W Neff, J Smayda, T Environ Health Perspect Research Article In connection with the CDC National Conference on Pfiesteria, a multidisciplinary panel evaluated Pfiesteria-related research. The panel set out what was known and what was not known about adverse effects of the organism on estuarine ecology, fish, and human health; assessed the methods used in Pfiesteria research; and offered suggestions to address data gaps. The panel's expertise covered dinoflagellate ecology; fish pathology and toxicology; laboratory measurement of toxins, epidemiology, and neurology. The panel evaluated peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed literature available through June 2000 in a systematic conceptual framework that moved from the source of exposure, through exposure research and dose, to human health effects. Substantial uncertainties remain throughout the conceptual framework the panel used to guide its evaluation. Firm evidence demonstrates that Pfiesteria is toxic to fish, but the specific toxin has not been isolated or characterized. Laboratory and field evidence indicate that the organism has a complex life cycle. The consequences of human exposure to Pfiesteria toxin and the magnitude of the human health problem remain obscure. The patchwork of approaches used in clinical evaluation and surrogate measures of exposure to the toxin are major limitations of this work. To protect public health, the panel suggests that priority be given research that will provide better insight into the effects of Pfiesteria on human health. Key gaps include the identity and mechanism of action of the toxin(s), the incomplete description of effects of exposure in invertebrates, fish, and humans, and the nature and extent of exposures that place people at risk. 2001-10 /pmc/articles/PMC1240594/ /pubmed/11687383 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Samet, J
Bignami, G S
Feldman, R
Hawkins, W
Neff, J
Smayda, T
Pfiesteria: review of the science and identification of research gaps. Report for the National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
title Pfiesteria: review of the science and identification of research gaps. Report for the National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
title_full Pfiesteria: review of the science and identification of research gaps. Report for the National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
title_fullStr Pfiesteria: review of the science and identification of research gaps. Report for the National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
title_full_unstemmed Pfiesteria: review of the science and identification of research gaps. Report for the National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
title_short Pfiesteria: review of the science and identification of research gaps. Report for the National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
title_sort pfiesteria: review of the science and identification of research gaps. report for the national center for environmental health, centers for disease control and prevention.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1240594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11687383
work_keys_str_mv AT sametj pfiesteriareviewofthescienceandidentificationofresearchgapsreportforthenationalcenterforenvironmentalhealthcentersfordiseasecontrolandprevention
AT bignamigs pfiesteriareviewofthescienceandidentificationofresearchgapsreportforthenationalcenterforenvironmentalhealthcentersfordiseasecontrolandprevention
AT feldmanr pfiesteriareviewofthescienceandidentificationofresearchgapsreportforthenationalcenterforenvironmentalhealthcentersfordiseasecontrolandprevention
AT hawkinsw pfiesteriareviewofthescienceandidentificationofresearchgapsreportforthenationalcenterforenvironmentalhealthcentersfordiseasecontrolandprevention
AT neffj pfiesteriareviewofthescienceandidentificationofresearchgapsreportforthenationalcenterforenvironmentalhealthcentersfordiseasecontrolandprevention
AT smaydat pfiesteriareviewofthescienceandidentificationofresearchgapsreportforthenationalcenterforenvironmentalhealthcentersfordiseasecontrolandprevention