Cargando…
Priorities for development of research methods in occupational cancer.
Occupational cancer research methods was identified in 1996 as 1 of 21 priority research areas in the National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA). To implement NORA, teams of experts from various sectors were formed and given the charge to further define research needs and develop strategies to enh...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1241299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12524210 |
_version_ | 1782125372068855808 |
---|---|
author | Ward, Elizabeth M Schulte, Paul A Bayard, Steve Blair, Aaron Brandt-Rauf, Paul Butler, Mary Ann Dankovic, David Hubbs, Ann F Jones, Carol Karstadt, Myra Kedderis, Gregory L Melnick, Ronald Redlich, Carrie A Rothman, Nathaniel Savage, Russell E Sprinker, Michael Toraason, Mark Weston, Ainsley Olshan, Andrew F Stewart, Patricia Zahm, Sheila Hoar |
author_facet | Ward, Elizabeth M Schulte, Paul A Bayard, Steve Blair, Aaron Brandt-Rauf, Paul Butler, Mary Ann Dankovic, David Hubbs, Ann F Jones, Carol Karstadt, Myra Kedderis, Gregory L Melnick, Ronald Redlich, Carrie A Rothman, Nathaniel Savage, Russell E Sprinker, Michael Toraason, Mark Weston, Ainsley Olshan, Andrew F Stewart, Patricia Zahm, Sheila Hoar |
author_sort | Ward, Elizabeth M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Occupational cancer research methods was identified in 1996 as 1 of 21 priority research areas in the National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA). To implement NORA, teams of experts from various sectors were formed and given the charge to further define research needs and develop strategies to enhance or augment research in each priority area. This article is a product of that process. Focus on occupational cancer research methods is important both because occupational factors play a significant role in a number of cancers, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality, and also because occupational cohorts (because of higher exposure levels) often provide unique opportunities to evaluate health effects of environmental toxicants and understand the carcinogenic process in humans. Despite an explosion of new methods for cancer research in general, these have not been widely applied to occupational cancer research. In this article we identify needs and gaps in occupational cancer research methods in four broad areas: identification of occupational carcinogens, design of epidemiologic studies, risk assessment, and primary and secondary prevention. Progress in occupational cancer will require interdisciplinary research involving epidemiologists, industrial hygienists, toxicologists, and molecular biologists. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1241299 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2003 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-12412992005-11-08 Priorities for development of research methods in occupational cancer. Ward, Elizabeth M Schulte, Paul A Bayard, Steve Blair, Aaron Brandt-Rauf, Paul Butler, Mary Ann Dankovic, David Hubbs, Ann F Jones, Carol Karstadt, Myra Kedderis, Gregory L Melnick, Ronald Redlich, Carrie A Rothman, Nathaniel Savage, Russell E Sprinker, Michael Toraason, Mark Weston, Ainsley Olshan, Andrew F Stewart, Patricia Zahm, Sheila Hoar Environ Health Perspect Research Article Occupational cancer research methods was identified in 1996 as 1 of 21 priority research areas in the National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA). To implement NORA, teams of experts from various sectors were formed and given the charge to further define research needs and develop strategies to enhance or augment research in each priority area. This article is a product of that process. Focus on occupational cancer research methods is important both because occupational factors play a significant role in a number of cancers, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality, and also because occupational cohorts (because of higher exposure levels) often provide unique opportunities to evaluate health effects of environmental toxicants and understand the carcinogenic process in humans. Despite an explosion of new methods for cancer research in general, these have not been widely applied to occupational cancer research. In this article we identify needs and gaps in occupational cancer research methods in four broad areas: identification of occupational carcinogens, design of epidemiologic studies, risk assessment, and primary and secondary prevention. Progress in occupational cancer will require interdisciplinary research involving epidemiologists, industrial hygienists, toxicologists, and molecular biologists. 2003-01 /pmc/articles/PMC1241299/ /pubmed/12524210 Text en |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ward, Elizabeth M Schulte, Paul A Bayard, Steve Blair, Aaron Brandt-Rauf, Paul Butler, Mary Ann Dankovic, David Hubbs, Ann F Jones, Carol Karstadt, Myra Kedderis, Gregory L Melnick, Ronald Redlich, Carrie A Rothman, Nathaniel Savage, Russell E Sprinker, Michael Toraason, Mark Weston, Ainsley Olshan, Andrew F Stewart, Patricia Zahm, Sheila Hoar Priorities for development of research methods in occupational cancer. |
title | Priorities for development of research methods in occupational cancer. |
title_full | Priorities for development of research methods in occupational cancer. |
title_fullStr | Priorities for development of research methods in occupational cancer. |
title_full_unstemmed | Priorities for development of research methods in occupational cancer. |
title_short | Priorities for development of research methods in occupational cancer. |
title_sort | priorities for development of research methods in occupational cancer. |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1241299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12524210 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wardelizabethm prioritiesfordevelopmentofresearchmethodsinoccupationalcancer AT schultepaula prioritiesfordevelopmentofresearchmethodsinoccupationalcancer AT bayardsteve prioritiesfordevelopmentofresearchmethodsinoccupationalcancer AT blairaaron prioritiesfordevelopmentofresearchmethodsinoccupationalcancer AT brandtraufpaul prioritiesfordevelopmentofresearchmethodsinoccupationalcancer AT butlermaryann prioritiesfordevelopmentofresearchmethodsinoccupationalcancer AT dankovicdavid prioritiesfordevelopmentofresearchmethodsinoccupationalcancer AT hubbsannf prioritiesfordevelopmentofresearchmethodsinoccupationalcancer AT jonescarol prioritiesfordevelopmentofresearchmethodsinoccupationalcancer AT karstadtmyra prioritiesfordevelopmentofresearchmethodsinoccupationalcancer AT kedderisgregoryl prioritiesfordevelopmentofresearchmethodsinoccupationalcancer AT melnickronald prioritiesfordevelopmentofresearchmethodsinoccupationalcancer AT redlichcarriea prioritiesfordevelopmentofresearchmethodsinoccupationalcancer AT rothmannathaniel prioritiesfordevelopmentofresearchmethodsinoccupationalcancer AT savagerusselle prioritiesfordevelopmentofresearchmethodsinoccupationalcancer AT sprinkermichael prioritiesfordevelopmentofresearchmethodsinoccupationalcancer AT toraasonmark prioritiesfordevelopmentofresearchmethodsinoccupationalcancer AT westonainsley prioritiesfordevelopmentofresearchmethodsinoccupationalcancer AT olshanandrewf prioritiesfordevelopmentofresearchmethodsinoccupationalcancer AT stewartpatricia prioritiesfordevelopmentofresearchmethodsinoccupationalcancer AT zahmsheilahoar prioritiesfordevelopmentofresearchmethodsinoccupationalcancer AT prioritiesfordevelopmentofresearchmethodsinoccupationalcancer |