Cargando…

Pending resolution: the question of who owns DNA.

With the emergence of the Human Genome Project and its private counterparts, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has begun receiving applications for the patenting of genes and genetic sequences. Earlier patent decisions regarding similar scientific advances limited patents to organisms "made...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Dahl, R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1242062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11171542
_version_ 1782125577371648000
author Dahl, R
author_facet Dahl, R
author_sort Dahl, R
collection PubMed
description With the emergence of the Human Genome Project and its private counterparts, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has begun receiving applications for the patenting of genes and genetic sequences. Earlier patent decisions regarding similar scientific advances limited patents to organisms "made by the hand of man," which would seem to remove discovered genes from patent protection. But many applicants have been successful in attaining patents for genes based on their ability to demonstrate the ultimate utility of the gene, for instance in medicine. One controversy regarding genomic patenting, however, is that patents apparently have been granted for mere gene fragments devoid of much demonstrable utility. Furthermore, critics fear that gene patenting will retard research by squelching scientists' ability to share findings freely.
format Text
id pubmed-1242062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-12420622005-11-08 Pending resolution: the question of who owns DNA. Dahl, R Environ Health Perspect Research Article With the emergence of the Human Genome Project and its private counterparts, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has begun receiving applications for the patenting of genes and genetic sequences. Earlier patent decisions regarding similar scientific advances limited patents to organisms "made by the hand of man," which would seem to remove discovered genes from patent protection. But many applicants have been successful in attaining patents for genes based on their ability to demonstrate the ultimate utility of the gene, for instance in medicine. One controversy regarding genomic patenting, however, is that patents apparently have been granted for mere gene fragments devoid of much demonstrable utility. Furthermore, critics fear that gene patenting will retard research by squelching scientists' ability to share findings freely. 2001-01 /pmc/articles/PMC1242062/ /pubmed/11171542 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Dahl, R
Pending resolution: the question of who owns DNA.
title Pending resolution: the question of who owns DNA.
title_full Pending resolution: the question of who owns DNA.
title_fullStr Pending resolution: the question of who owns DNA.
title_full_unstemmed Pending resolution: the question of who owns DNA.
title_short Pending resolution: the question of who owns DNA.
title_sort pending resolution: the question of who owns dna.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1242062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11171542
work_keys_str_mv AT dahlr pendingresolutionthequestionofwhoownsdna