Cargando…
Early stopping of clinical trials
Early stopping of clinical trials in favour of a new treatment creates ethical and scientific difficulties, which are different from those associated with early stopping due to toxicity or futility. Two major breast cancer trials have recently taken such a decision, and the problem is relevant for s...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1242138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16168134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr1280 |
_version_ | 1782125602712584192 |
---|---|
author | Cuzick, Jack Howell, Anthony Forbes, John |
author_facet | Cuzick, Jack Howell, Anthony Forbes, John |
author_sort | Cuzick, Jack |
collection | PubMed |
description | Early stopping of clinical trials in favour of a new treatment creates ethical and scientific difficulties, which are different from those associated with early stopping due to toxicity or futility. Two major breast cancer trials have recently taken such a decision, and the problem is relevant for several ongoing trials. Here we argue that such a decision should be taken with the utmost gravity and should be based on a clear overall clinical benefit for the new treatment, and not as an automatic response to crossing a predefined threshold. Predefined rules can be used to trigger a debate within the Independent Data Monitoring and Safety Committee (IDMC) about early stopping, but the IDMC should retain the responsibility of assessing overall clinical benefit in making its recommendation. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1242138 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-12421382005-10-06 Early stopping of clinical trials Cuzick, Jack Howell, Anthony Forbes, John Breast Cancer Res Commentary Early stopping of clinical trials in favour of a new treatment creates ethical and scientific difficulties, which are different from those associated with early stopping due to toxicity or futility. Two major breast cancer trials have recently taken such a decision, and the problem is relevant for several ongoing trials. Here we argue that such a decision should be taken with the utmost gravity and should be based on a clear overall clinical benefit for the new treatment, and not as an automatic response to crossing a predefined threshold. Predefined rules can be used to trigger a debate within the Independent Data Monitoring and Safety Committee (IDMC) about early stopping, but the IDMC should retain the responsibility of assessing overall clinical benefit in making its recommendation. BioMed Central 2005 2005-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC1242138/ /pubmed/16168134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr1280 Text en Copyright © 2005 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Cuzick, Jack Howell, Anthony Forbes, John Early stopping of clinical trials |
title | Early stopping of clinical trials |
title_full | Early stopping of clinical trials |
title_fullStr | Early stopping of clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Early stopping of clinical trials |
title_short | Early stopping of clinical trials |
title_sort | early stopping of clinical trials |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1242138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16168134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr1280 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cuzickjack earlystoppingofclinicaltrials AT howellanthony earlystoppingofclinicaltrials AT forbesjohn earlystoppingofclinicaltrials |