Cargando…
Effect Measures in Prevalence Studies
There is still considerable confusion and debate about the appropriate methods for analyzing prevalence studies, and a number of recent papers have argued that prevalence ratios are the preferred method and that prevalence odds ratios should not be used. These arguments assert that the prevalence ra...
Autor principal: | Pearce, Neil |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Institue of Environmental Health Sciences
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1247374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15238274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6927 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Vandenbroucke and Pearce Respond to “Incident and Prevalent Exposures and Causal Inference”
por: Vandenbroucke, Jan, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Point: Incident Exposures, Prevalent Exposures, and Causal Inference: Does Limiting Studies to Persons Who Are Followed From First Exposure Onward Damage Epidemiology?
por: Vandenbroucke, Jan, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Effect of including historical height and radius BMD measurement on sarco-osteoporosis prevalence
por: Buehring, Bjoern, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Analysis of matched case-control studies
por: Pearce, Neil
Publicado: (2016) -
Occupations with an increased prevalence of self-reported asthma in Indian adults
por: Agrawal, Sutapa, et al.
Publicado: (2014)