Cargando…

Protein secondary structure assignment revisited: a detailed analysis of different assignment methods

BACKGROUND: A number of methods are now available to perform automatic assignment of periodic secondary structures from atomic coordinates, based on different characteristics of the secondary structures. In general these methods exhibit a broad consensus as to the location of most helix and strand c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin, Juliette, Letellier, Guillaume, Marin, Antoine, Taly, Jean-François, de Brevern, Alexandre G, Gibrat, Jean-François
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1249586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16164759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-5-17
_version_ 1782125720605032448
author Martin, Juliette
Letellier, Guillaume
Marin, Antoine
Taly, Jean-François
de Brevern, Alexandre G
Gibrat, Jean-François
author_facet Martin, Juliette
Letellier, Guillaume
Marin, Antoine
Taly, Jean-François
de Brevern, Alexandre G
Gibrat, Jean-François
author_sort Martin, Juliette
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A number of methods are now available to perform automatic assignment of periodic secondary structures from atomic coordinates, based on different characteristics of the secondary structures. In general these methods exhibit a broad consensus as to the location of most helix and strand core segments in protein structures. However the termini of the segments are often ill-defined and it is difficult to decide unambiguously which residues at the edge of the segments have to be included. In addition, there is a "twilight zone" where secondary structure segments depart significantly from the idealized models of Pauling and Corey. For these segments, one has to decide whether the observed structural variations are merely distorsions or whether they constitute a break in the secondary structure. METHODS: To address these problems, we have developed a method for secondary structure assignment, called KAKSI. Assignments made by KAKSI are compared with assignments given by DSSP, STRIDE, XTLSSTR, PSEA and SECSTR, as well as secondary structures found in PDB files, on 4 datasets (X-ray structures with different resolution range, NMR structures). RESULTS: A detailed comparison of KAKSI assignments with those of STRIDE and PSEA reveals that KAKSI assigns slightly longer helices and strands than STRIDE in case of one-to-one correspondence between the segments. However, KAKSI tends also to favor the assignment of several short helices when STRIDE and PSEA assign longer, kinked, helices. Helices assigned by KAKSI have geometrical characteristics close to those described in the PDB. They are more linear than helices assigned by other methods. The same tendency to split long segments is observed for strands, although less systematically. We present a number of cases of secondary structure assignments that illustrate this behavior. CONCLUSION: Our method provides valuable assignments which favor the regularity of secondary structure segments.
format Text
id pubmed-1249586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-12495862005-10-08 Protein secondary structure assignment revisited: a detailed analysis of different assignment methods Martin, Juliette Letellier, Guillaume Marin, Antoine Taly, Jean-François de Brevern, Alexandre G Gibrat, Jean-François BMC Struct Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: A number of methods are now available to perform automatic assignment of periodic secondary structures from atomic coordinates, based on different characteristics of the secondary structures. In general these methods exhibit a broad consensus as to the location of most helix and strand core segments in protein structures. However the termini of the segments are often ill-defined and it is difficult to decide unambiguously which residues at the edge of the segments have to be included. In addition, there is a "twilight zone" where secondary structure segments depart significantly from the idealized models of Pauling and Corey. For these segments, one has to decide whether the observed structural variations are merely distorsions or whether they constitute a break in the secondary structure. METHODS: To address these problems, we have developed a method for secondary structure assignment, called KAKSI. Assignments made by KAKSI are compared with assignments given by DSSP, STRIDE, XTLSSTR, PSEA and SECSTR, as well as secondary structures found in PDB files, on 4 datasets (X-ray structures with different resolution range, NMR structures). RESULTS: A detailed comparison of KAKSI assignments with those of STRIDE and PSEA reveals that KAKSI assigns slightly longer helices and strands than STRIDE in case of one-to-one correspondence between the segments. However, KAKSI tends also to favor the assignment of several short helices when STRIDE and PSEA assign longer, kinked, helices. Helices assigned by KAKSI have geometrical characteristics close to those described in the PDB. They are more linear than helices assigned by other methods. The same tendency to split long segments is observed for strands, although less systematically. We present a number of cases of secondary structure assignments that illustrate this behavior. CONCLUSION: Our method provides valuable assignments which favor the regularity of secondary structure segments. BioMed Central 2005-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC1249586/ /pubmed/16164759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-5-17 Text en Copyright © 2005 Martin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
spellingShingle Research Article
Martin, Juliette
Letellier, Guillaume
Marin, Antoine
Taly, Jean-François
de Brevern, Alexandre G
Gibrat, Jean-François
Protein secondary structure assignment revisited: a detailed analysis of different assignment methods
title Protein secondary structure assignment revisited: a detailed analysis of different assignment methods
title_full Protein secondary structure assignment revisited: a detailed analysis of different assignment methods
title_fullStr Protein secondary structure assignment revisited: a detailed analysis of different assignment methods
title_full_unstemmed Protein secondary structure assignment revisited: a detailed analysis of different assignment methods
title_short Protein secondary structure assignment revisited: a detailed analysis of different assignment methods
title_sort protein secondary structure assignment revisited: a detailed analysis of different assignment methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1249586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16164759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-5-17
work_keys_str_mv AT martinjuliette proteinsecondarystructureassignmentrevisitedadetailedanalysisofdifferentassignmentmethods
AT letellierguillaume proteinsecondarystructureassignmentrevisitedadetailedanalysisofdifferentassignmentmethods
AT marinantoine proteinsecondarystructureassignmentrevisitedadetailedanalysisofdifferentassignmentmethods
AT talyjeanfrancois proteinsecondarystructureassignmentrevisitedadetailedanalysisofdifferentassignmentmethods
AT debrevernalexandreg proteinsecondarystructureassignmentrevisitedadetailedanalysisofdifferentassignmentmethods
AT gibratjeanfrancois proteinsecondarystructureassignmentrevisitedadetailedanalysisofdifferentassignmentmethods