Cargando…

Need for critical care in gynaecology: a population-based analysis

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to note potential gynaecological risk factors leading to intensive care and to estimate the frequency, costs and outcome of management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a cross-sectional study of intensive care admissions in Kuopio from March 1993 to December 200...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heinonen, Seppo, Tyrväinen, Esko, Penttinen, Jorma, Saarikoski, Seppo, Ruokonen, Esko
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC125319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12225615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1525
_version_ 1782120314665172992
author Heinonen, Seppo
Tyrväinen, Esko
Penttinen, Jorma
Saarikoski, Seppo
Ruokonen, Esko
author_facet Heinonen, Seppo
Tyrväinen, Esko
Penttinen, Jorma
Saarikoski, Seppo
Ruokonen, Esko
author_sort Heinonen, Seppo
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to note potential gynaecological risk factors leading to intensive care and to estimate the frequency, costs and outcome of management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a cross-sectional study of intensive care admissions in Kuopio from March 1993 to December 2000, 23 consecutive gynaecological patients admitted to a mixed medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) were followed. We recorded demographics, admitting diagnoses, scores on the Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, clinical outcome and treatment costs. RESULTS: The overall need for intensive care was 2.3 per 1000 women undergoing major surgery during the study period. Patients were 55.4 ± 16.9 (mean ± SD) years old, with a mean APACHE II score of 14.07 (± 5.57). The most common diagnoses at admission were postoperative haemorrhage (43%), infection (39%) and cardiovascular disease (30%). The duration of stay in the ICU was 4.97 (± 9.28) (range 1–42) days and the mortality within 6 months was 26%, although the mortality in the ICU was 0%. The total cost of intensive care was approximately US$7044 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Very few gynaecological patients develop complications requiring intensive care. The presence of gynaecological malignancy and pre-existing medical disorders are clinically useful predictors of eventual outcome, but many cases occur in women with a low risk and this implies that the risk is relevant to all procedures. Further research is needed to determine effective preventive approaches.
format Text
id pubmed-125319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2002
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-1253192002-10-28 Need for critical care in gynaecology: a population-based analysis Heinonen, Seppo Tyrväinen, Esko Penttinen, Jorma Saarikoski, Seppo Ruokonen, Esko Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to note potential gynaecological risk factors leading to intensive care and to estimate the frequency, costs and outcome of management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a cross-sectional study of intensive care admissions in Kuopio from March 1993 to December 2000, 23 consecutive gynaecological patients admitted to a mixed medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) were followed. We recorded demographics, admitting diagnoses, scores on the Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, clinical outcome and treatment costs. RESULTS: The overall need for intensive care was 2.3 per 1000 women undergoing major surgery during the study period. Patients were 55.4 ± 16.9 (mean ± SD) years old, with a mean APACHE II score of 14.07 (± 5.57). The most common diagnoses at admission were postoperative haemorrhage (43%), infection (39%) and cardiovascular disease (30%). The duration of stay in the ICU was 4.97 (± 9.28) (range 1–42) days and the mortality within 6 months was 26%, although the mortality in the ICU was 0%. The total cost of intensive care was approximately US$7044 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Very few gynaecological patients develop complications requiring intensive care. The presence of gynaecological malignancy and pre-existing medical disorders are clinically useful predictors of eventual outcome, but many cases occur in women with a low risk and this implies that the risk is relevant to all procedures. Further research is needed to determine effective preventive approaches. BioMed Central 2002 2002-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC125319/ /pubmed/12225615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1525 Text en Copyright © 2002 Heinonen et al., licensee BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Research
Heinonen, Seppo
Tyrväinen, Esko
Penttinen, Jorma
Saarikoski, Seppo
Ruokonen, Esko
Need for critical care in gynaecology: a population-based analysis
title Need for critical care in gynaecology: a population-based analysis
title_full Need for critical care in gynaecology: a population-based analysis
title_fullStr Need for critical care in gynaecology: a population-based analysis
title_full_unstemmed Need for critical care in gynaecology: a population-based analysis
title_short Need for critical care in gynaecology: a population-based analysis
title_sort need for critical care in gynaecology: a population-based analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC125319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12225615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1525
work_keys_str_mv AT heinonenseppo needforcriticalcareingynaecologyapopulationbasedanalysis
AT tyrvainenesko needforcriticalcareingynaecologyapopulationbasedanalysis
AT penttinenjorma needforcriticalcareingynaecologyapopulationbasedanalysis
AT saarikoskiseppo needforcriticalcareingynaecologyapopulationbasedanalysis
AT ruokonenesko needforcriticalcareingynaecologyapopulationbasedanalysis