Cargando…
Need for critical care in gynaecology: a population-based analysis
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to note potential gynaecological risk factors leading to intensive care and to estimate the frequency, costs and outcome of management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a cross-sectional study of intensive care admissions in Kuopio from March 1993 to December 200...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2002
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC125319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12225615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1525 |
_version_ | 1782120314665172992 |
---|---|
author | Heinonen, Seppo Tyrväinen, Esko Penttinen, Jorma Saarikoski, Seppo Ruokonen, Esko |
author_facet | Heinonen, Seppo Tyrväinen, Esko Penttinen, Jorma Saarikoski, Seppo Ruokonen, Esko |
author_sort | Heinonen, Seppo |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to note potential gynaecological risk factors leading to intensive care and to estimate the frequency, costs and outcome of management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a cross-sectional study of intensive care admissions in Kuopio from March 1993 to December 2000, 23 consecutive gynaecological patients admitted to a mixed medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) were followed. We recorded demographics, admitting diagnoses, scores on the Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, clinical outcome and treatment costs. RESULTS: The overall need for intensive care was 2.3 per 1000 women undergoing major surgery during the study period. Patients were 55.4 ± 16.9 (mean ± SD) years old, with a mean APACHE II score of 14.07 (± 5.57). The most common diagnoses at admission were postoperative haemorrhage (43%), infection (39%) and cardiovascular disease (30%). The duration of stay in the ICU was 4.97 (± 9.28) (range 1–42) days and the mortality within 6 months was 26%, although the mortality in the ICU was 0%. The total cost of intensive care was approximately US$7044 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Very few gynaecological patients develop complications requiring intensive care. The presence of gynaecological malignancy and pre-existing medical disorders are clinically useful predictors of eventual outcome, but many cases occur in women with a low risk and this implies that the risk is relevant to all procedures. Further research is needed to determine effective preventive approaches. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-125319 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2002 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-1253192002-10-28 Need for critical care in gynaecology: a population-based analysis Heinonen, Seppo Tyrväinen, Esko Penttinen, Jorma Saarikoski, Seppo Ruokonen, Esko Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to note potential gynaecological risk factors leading to intensive care and to estimate the frequency, costs and outcome of management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a cross-sectional study of intensive care admissions in Kuopio from March 1993 to December 2000, 23 consecutive gynaecological patients admitted to a mixed medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) were followed. We recorded demographics, admitting diagnoses, scores on the Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, clinical outcome and treatment costs. RESULTS: The overall need for intensive care was 2.3 per 1000 women undergoing major surgery during the study period. Patients were 55.4 ± 16.9 (mean ± SD) years old, with a mean APACHE II score of 14.07 (± 5.57). The most common diagnoses at admission were postoperative haemorrhage (43%), infection (39%) and cardiovascular disease (30%). The duration of stay in the ICU was 4.97 (± 9.28) (range 1–42) days and the mortality within 6 months was 26%, although the mortality in the ICU was 0%. The total cost of intensive care was approximately US$7044 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Very few gynaecological patients develop complications requiring intensive care. The presence of gynaecological malignancy and pre-existing medical disorders are clinically useful predictors of eventual outcome, but many cases occur in women with a low risk and this implies that the risk is relevant to all procedures. Further research is needed to determine effective preventive approaches. BioMed Central 2002 2002-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC125319/ /pubmed/12225615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1525 Text en Copyright © 2002 Heinonen et al., licensee BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Research Heinonen, Seppo Tyrväinen, Esko Penttinen, Jorma Saarikoski, Seppo Ruokonen, Esko Need for critical care in gynaecology: a population-based analysis |
title | Need for critical care in gynaecology: a population-based analysis |
title_full | Need for critical care in gynaecology: a population-based analysis |
title_fullStr | Need for critical care in gynaecology: a population-based analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Need for critical care in gynaecology: a population-based analysis |
title_short | Need for critical care in gynaecology: a population-based analysis |
title_sort | need for critical care in gynaecology: a population-based analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC125319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12225615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1525 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heinonenseppo needforcriticalcareingynaecologyapopulationbasedanalysis AT tyrvainenesko needforcriticalcareingynaecologyapopulationbasedanalysis AT penttinenjorma needforcriticalcareingynaecologyapopulationbasedanalysis AT saarikoskiseppo needforcriticalcareingynaecologyapopulationbasedanalysis AT ruokonenesko needforcriticalcareingynaecologyapopulationbasedanalysis |