Cargando…
Comparison of Biostimulation versus Bioaugmentation with Bacterial Strain PM1 for Treatment of Groundwater Contaminated with Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE)
Widespread contamination of groundwater by methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) has triggered the exploration of different technologies for in situ removal of the pollutant, including biostimulation of naturally occurring microbial communities or bioaugmentation with specific microbial strains known t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Institue of Environmental Health Sciences
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1253758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15743721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6939 |
_version_ | 1782125776614719488 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Amanda E. Hristova, Krassimira Wood, Isaac Mackay, Doug M. Lory, Ernie Lorenzana, Dale Scow, Kate M. |
author_facet | Smith, Amanda E. Hristova, Krassimira Wood, Isaac Mackay, Doug M. Lory, Ernie Lorenzana, Dale Scow, Kate M. |
author_sort | Smith, Amanda E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Widespread contamination of groundwater by methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) has triggered the exploration of different technologies for in situ removal of the pollutant, including biostimulation of naturally occurring microbial communities or bioaugmentation with specific microbial strains known to biodegrade the oxygenate. After laboratory studies revealed that bacterial strain PM1 rapidly and completely biodegraded MTBE in groundwater sediments, the organism was tested in an in situ field study at Port Hueneme Naval Construction Battalion Center in Oxnard, California. Two pilot test plots (A and B) in groundwater located down-gradient from an MTBE source were intermittently sparged with pure oxygen. Plot B was also inoculated with strain PM1. MTBE concentrations up-gradient from plots A and B initially varied temporally from 1.5 to 6 mg MTBE/L. Six months after treatment began, MTBE concentrations in monitoring wells down-gradient from the injection bed decreased substantially in the shallow zone of the ground-water in plots A and B, thus even in the absence of the inoculated strain PM1. In the deeper zone, downstream MTBE concentrations also decreased in plot A and to a lesser extent in plot B. Difficulties in delivery of oxygen to the deeper zone of plot B, evidenced by low dissolved oxygen concentrations, were likely responsible for low rates of MTBE removal at that location. We measured the survival and movement of strain PM1 in groundwater samples using two methods for detection of DNA sequences specific to strain PM1: TaqMan quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and internal transcribed spacer region analysis. A naturally occurring bacterial strain with > 99% 16S rDNA sequence similarity to strain PM1 was detected in groundwater collected at various locations at Port Hueneme, including outside the plots where the organism was inoculated. Addition of oxygen to naturally occurring microbial populations was sufficient to stimulate MTBE removal at this site. In some cases, however, inoculation with an MTBE-degrading culture may be warranted. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1253758 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | National Institue of Environmental Health Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-12537582005-11-08 Comparison of Biostimulation versus Bioaugmentation with Bacterial Strain PM1 for Treatment of Groundwater Contaminated with Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) Smith, Amanda E. Hristova, Krassimira Wood, Isaac Mackay, Doug M. Lory, Ernie Lorenzana, Dale Scow, Kate M. Environ Health Perspect Research Widespread contamination of groundwater by methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) has triggered the exploration of different technologies for in situ removal of the pollutant, including biostimulation of naturally occurring microbial communities or bioaugmentation with specific microbial strains known to biodegrade the oxygenate. After laboratory studies revealed that bacterial strain PM1 rapidly and completely biodegraded MTBE in groundwater sediments, the organism was tested in an in situ field study at Port Hueneme Naval Construction Battalion Center in Oxnard, California. Two pilot test plots (A and B) in groundwater located down-gradient from an MTBE source were intermittently sparged with pure oxygen. Plot B was also inoculated with strain PM1. MTBE concentrations up-gradient from plots A and B initially varied temporally from 1.5 to 6 mg MTBE/L. Six months after treatment began, MTBE concentrations in monitoring wells down-gradient from the injection bed decreased substantially in the shallow zone of the ground-water in plots A and B, thus even in the absence of the inoculated strain PM1. In the deeper zone, downstream MTBE concentrations also decreased in plot A and to a lesser extent in plot B. Difficulties in delivery of oxygen to the deeper zone of plot B, evidenced by low dissolved oxygen concentrations, were likely responsible for low rates of MTBE removal at that location. We measured the survival and movement of strain PM1 in groundwater samples using two methods for detection of DNA sequences specific to strain PM1: TaqMan quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and internal transcribed spacer region analysis. A naturally occurring bacterial strain with > 99% 16S rDNA sequence similarity to strain PM1 was detected in groundwater collected at various locations at Port Hueneme, including outside the plots where the organism was inoculated. Addition of oxygen to naturally occurring microbial populations was sufficient to stimulate MTBE removal at this site. In some cases, however, inoculation with an MTBE-degrading culture may be warranted. National Institue of Environmental Health Sciences 2005-03 2004-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC1253758/ /pubmed/15743721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6939 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright. |
spellingShingle | Research Smith, Amanda E. Hristova, Krassimira Wood, Isaac Mackay, Doug M. Lory, Ernie Lorenzana, Dale Scow, Kate M. Comparison of Biostimulation versus Bioaugmentation with Bacterial Strain PM1 for Treatment of Groundwater Contaminated with Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) |
title | Comparison of Biostimulation versus Bioaugmentation with Bacterial Strain PM1 for Treatment of Groundwater Contaminated with Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) |
title_full | Comparison of Biostimulation versus Bioaugmentation with Bacterial Strain PM1 for Treatment of Groundwater Contaminated with Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Biostimulation versus Bioaugmentation with Bacterial Strain PM1 for Treatment of Groundwater Contaminated with Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Biostimulation versus Bioaugmentation with Bacterial Strain PM1 for Treatment of Groundwater Contaminated with Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) |
title_short | Comparison of Biostimulation versus Bioaugmentation with Bacterial Strain PM1 for Treatment of Groundwater Contaminated with Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) |
title_sort | comparison of biostimulation versus bioaugmentation with bacterial strain pm1 for treatment of groundwater contaminated with methyl tertiary butyl ether (mtbe) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1253758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15743721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6939 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithamandae comparisonofbiostimulationversusbioaugmentationwithbacterialstrainpm1fortreatmentofgroundwatercontaminatedwithmethyltertiarybutylethermtbe AT hristovakrassimira comparisonofbiostimulationversusbioaugmentationwithbacterialstrainpm1fortreatmentofgroundwatercontaminatedwithmethyltertiarybutylethermtbe AT woodisaac comparisonofbiostimulationversusbioaugmentationwithbacterialstrainpm1fortreatmentofgroundwatercontaminatedwithmethyltertiarybutylethermtbe AT mackaydougm comparisonofbiostimulationversusbioaugmentationwithbacterialstrainpm1fortreatmentofgroundwatercontaminatedwithmethyltertiarybutylethermtbe AT loryernie comparisonofbiostimulationversusbioaugmentationwithbacterialstrainpm1fortreatmentofgroundwatercontaminatedwithmethyltertiarybutylethermtbe AT lorenzanadale comparisonofbiostimulationversusbioaugmentationwithbacterialstrainpm1fortreatmentofgroundwatercontaminatedwithmethyltertiarybutylethermtbe AT scowkatem comparisonofbiostimulationversusbioaugmentationwithbacterialstrainpm1fortreatmentofgroundwatercontaminatedwithmethyltertiarybutylethermtbe |