Cargando…

Comparison of Biostimulation versus Bioaugmentation with Bacterial Strain PM1 for Treatment of Groundwater Contaminated with Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE)

Widespread contamination of groundwater by methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) has triggered the exploration of different technologies for in situ removal of the pollutant, including biostimulation of naturally occurring microbial communities or bioaugmentation with specific microbial strains known t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Amanda E., Hristova, Krassimira, Wood, Isaac, Mackay, Doug M., Lory, Ernie, Lorenzana, Dale, Scow, Kate M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institue of Environmental Health Sciences 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1253758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15743721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6939
_version_ 1782125776614719488
author Smith, Amanda E.
Hristova, Krassimira
Wood, Isaac
Mackay, Doug M.
Lory, Ernie
Lorenzana, Dale
Scow, Kate M.
author_facet Smith, Amanda E.
Hristova, Krassimira
Wood, Isaac
Mackay, Doug M.
Lory, Ernie
Lorenzana, Dale
Scow, Kate M.
author_sort Smith, Amanda E.
collection PubMed
description Widespread contamination of groundwater by methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) has triggered the exploration of different technologies for in situ removal of the pollutant, including biostimulation of naturally occurring microbial communities or bioaugmentation with specific microbial strains known to biodegrade the oxygenate. After laboratory studies revealed that bacterial strain PM1 rapidly and completely biodegraded MTBE in groundwater sediments, the organism was tested in an in situ field study at Port Hueneme Naval Construction Battalion Center in Oxnard, California. Two pilot test plots (A and B) in groundwater located down-gradient from an MTBE source were intermittently sparged with pure oxygen. Plot B was also inoculated with strain PM1. MTBE concentrations up-gradient from plots A and B initially varied temporally from 1.5 to 6 mg MTBE/L. Six months after treatment began, MTBE concentrations in monitoring wells down-gradient from the injection bed decreased substantially in the shallow zone of the ground-water in plots A and B, thus even in the absence of the inoculated strain PM1. In the deeper zone, downstream MTBE concentrations also decreased in plot A and to a lesser extent in plot B. Difficulties in delivery of oxygen to the deeper zone of plot B, evidenced by low dissolved oxygen concentrations, were likely responsible for low rates of MTBE removal at that location. We measured the survival and movement of strain PM1 in groundwater samples using two methods for detection of DNA sequences specific to strain PM1: TaqMan quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and internal transcribed spacer region analysis. A naturally occurring bacterial strain with > 99% 16S rDNA sequence similarity to strain PM1 was detected in groundwater collected at various locations at Port Hueneme, including outside the plots where the organism was inoculated. Addition of oxygen to naturally occurring microbial populations was sufficient to stimulate MTBE removal at this site. In some cases, however, inoculation with an MTBE-degrading culture may be warranted.
format Text
id pubmed-1253758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher National Institue of Environmental Health Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-12537582005-11-08 Comparison of Biostimulation versus Bioaugmentation with Bacterial Strain PM1 for Treatment of Groundwater Contaminated with Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) Smith, Amanda E. Hristova, Krassimira Wood, Isaac Mackay, Doug M. Lory, Ernie Lorenzana, Dale Scow, Kate M. Environ Health Perspect Research Widespread contamination of groundwater by methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) has triggered the exploration of different technologies for in situ removal of the pollutant, including biostimulation of naturally occurring microbial communities or bioaugmentation with specific microbial strains known to biodegrade the oxygenate. After laboratory studies revealed that bacterial strain PM1 rapidly and completely biodegraded MTBE in groundwater sediments, the organism was tested in an in situ field study at Port Hueneme Naval Construction Battalion Center in Oxnard, California. Two pilot test plots (A and B) in groundwater located down-gradient from an MTBE source were intermittently sparged with pure oxygen. Plot B was also inoculated with strain PM1. MTBE concentrations up-gradient from plots A and B initially varied temporally from 1.5 to 6 mg MTBE/L. Six months after treatment began, MTBE concentrations in monitoring wells down-gradient from the injection bed decreased substantially in the shallow zone of the ground-water in plots A and B, thus even in the absence of the inoculated strain PM1. In the deeper zone, downstream MTBE concentrations also decreased in plot A and to a lesser extent in plot B. Difficulties in delivery of oxygen to the deeper zone of plot B, evidenced by low dissolved oxygen concentrations, were likely responsible for low rates of MTBE removal at that location. We measured the survival and movement of strain PM1 in groundwater samples using two methods for detection of DNA sequences specific to strain PM1: TaqMan quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and internal transcribed spacer region analysis. A naturally occurring bacterial strain with > 99% 16S rDNA sequence similarity to strain PM1 was detected in groundwater collected at various locations at Port Hueneme, including outside the plots where the organism was inoculated. Addition of oxygen to naturally occurring microbial populations was sufficient to stimulate MTBE removal at this site. In some cases, however, inoculation with an MTBE-degrading culture may be warranted. National Institue of Environmental Health Sciences 2005-03 2004-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC1253758/ /pubmed/15743721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6939 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Research
Smith, Amanda E.
Hristova, Krassimira
Wood, Isaac
Mackay, Doug M.
Lory, Ernie
Lorenzana, Dale
Scow, Kate M.
Comparison of Biostimulation versus Bioaugmentation with Bacterial Strain PM1 for Treatment of Groundwater Contaminated with Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE)
title Comparison of Biostimulation versus Bioaugmentation with Bacterial Strain PM1 for Treatment of Groundwater Contaminated with Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE)
title_full Comparison of Biostimulation versus Bioaugmentation with Bacterial Strain PM1 for Treatment of Groundwater Contaminated with Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE)
title_fullStr Comparison of Biostimulation versus Bioaugmentation with Bacterial Strain PM1 for Treatment of Groundwater Contaminated with Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE)
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Biostimulation versus Bioaugmentation with Bacterial Strain PM1 for Treatment of Groundwater Contaminated with Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE)
title_short Comparison of Biostimulation versus Bioaugmentation with Bacterial Strain PM1 for Treatment of Groundwater Contaminated with Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE)
title_sort comparison of biostimulation versus bioaugmentation with bacterial strain pm1 for treatment of groundwater contaminated with methyl tertiary butyl ether (mtbe)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1253758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15743721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6939
work_keys_str_mv AT smithamandae comparisonofbiostimulationversusbioaugmentationwithbacterialstrainpm1fortreatmentofgroundwatercontaminatedwithmethyltertiarybutylethermtbe
AT hristovakrassimira comparisonofbiostimulationversusbioaugmentationwithbacterialstrainpm1fortreatmentofgroundwatercontaminatedwithmethyltertiarybutylethermtbe
AT woodisaac comparisonofbiostimulationversusbioaugmentationwithbacterialstrainpm1fortreatmentofgroundwatercontaminatedwithmethyltertiarybutylethermtbe
AT mackaydougm comparisonofbiostimulationversusbioaugmentationwithbacterialstrainpm1fortreatmentofgroundwatercontaminatedwithmethyltertiarybutylethermtbe
AT loryernie comparisonofbiostimulationversusbioaugmentationwithbacterialstrainpm1fortreatmentofgroundwatercontaminatedwithmethyltertiarybutylethermtbe
AT lorenzanadale comparisonofbiostimulationversusbioaugmentationwithbacterialstrainpm1fortreatmentofgroundwatercontaminatedwithmethyltertiarybutylethermtbe
AT scowkatem comparisonofbiostimulationversusbioaugmentationwithbacterialstrainpm1fortreatmentofgroundwatercontaminatedwithmethyltertiarybutylethermtbe