Cargando…

Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isocitrate dehydrogenases (ICD-1 and ICD-2) reveals differences in coenzyme affinity, oligomeric state, pH tolerance and phylogenetic affiliation

BACKGROUND: M.tb icd-1 and M.tb icd-2, have been identified in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome as probable isocitrate dehydrogenase (ICD) genes. Earlier we demonstrated that the two isoforms can elicit B cell response in TB patients and significantly differentiate TB infected population from h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Banerjee, Sharmistha, Nandyala, Ashok, Podili, RaviPrasad, Katoch, Vishwa Mohan, Hasnain, Seyed E
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1260013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16194279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2091-6-20
_version_ 1782125855716147200
author Banerjee, Sharmistha
Nandyala, Ashok
Podili, RaviPrasad
Katoch, Vishwa Mohan
Hasnain, Seyed E
author_facet Banerjee, Sharmistha
Nandyala, Ashok
Podili, RaviPrasad
Katoch, Vishwa Mohan
Hasnain, Seyed E
author_sort Banerjee, Sharmistha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: M.tb icd-1 and M.tb icd-2, have been identified in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome as probable isocitrate dehydrogenase (ICD) genes. Earlier we demonstrated that the two isoforms can elicit B cell response in TB patients and significantly differentiate TB infected population from healthy, BCG-vaccinated controls. Even though immunoassays suggest that these proteins are closely related in terms of antigenic determinants, we now show that M.tb icd-1 and M.tb icd-2 code for functional energy cycle enzymes and document the differences in their biochemical properties, oligomeric assembly and phylogenetic affiliation. RESULTS: Functionally, both M.tb ICD-1 and ICD-2 proteins are dimers. Zn(+2 )can act as a cofactor for ICD-1 apart from Mg(+2), but not for ICD-2. ICD-1 has higher affinity for metal substrate complex (Km (isocitrate) with Mg(++):10 μM ± 5) than ICD-2 (Km (isocitrate) with Mg(++):20 μM ± 1). ICD-1 is active across a wider pH range than ICD-2, retaining 33–35% activity in an acidic pH upto 5.5. Difference in thermal behaviour is also observed with ICD-2 being active across wider temperature range (20°C to 40°C) than ICD-1 (optimum temperature 40°C). The isozymes are NADP(+ )dependent with distinct phylogenetic affiliations; unlike M.tb ICD-2 that groups with bacterial ICDs, M.tb ICD-1 exhibits a closer lineage to eukaryotic NADP(+ )dependent ICDs. CONCLUSION: The data provide experimental evidence to show that the two open reading frames, Rv3339c (ICD-1) and Rv0066c (ICD-2), annotated as probable ICDs are functional TCA cycle enzymes with identical enzymatic function but different physio-chemical and kinetic properties. The differences in biochemical and kinetic properties suggest the possibility of differential expression of the two ICDs during different stages of growth, despite having identical metabolic function.
format Text
id pubmed-1260013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-12600132005-10-21 Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isocitrate dehydrogenases (ICD-1 and ICD-2) reveals differences in coenzyme affinity, oligomeric state, pH tolerance and phylogenetic affiliation Banerjee, Sharmistha Nandyala, Ashok Podili, RaviPrasad Katoch, Vishwa Mohan Hasnain, Seyed E BMC Biochem Research Article BACKGROUND: M.tb icd-1 and M.tb icd-2, have been identified in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome as probable isocitrate dehydrogenase (ICD) genes. Earlier we demonstrated that the two isoforms can elicit B cell response in TB patients and significantly differentiate TB infected population from healthy, BCG-vaccinated controls. Even though immunoassays suggest that these proteins are closely related in terms of antigenic determinants, we now show that M.tb icd-1 and M.tb icd-2 code for functional energy cycle enzymes and document the differences in their biochemical properties, oligomeric assembly and phylogenetic affiliation. RESULTS: Functionally, both M.tb ICD-1 and ICD-2 proteins are dimers. Zn(+2 )can act as a cofactor for ICD-1 apart from Mg(+2), but not for ICD-2. ICD-1 has higher affinity for metal substrate complex (Km (isocitrate) with Mg(++):10 μM ± 5) than ICD-2 (Km (isocitrate) with Mg(++):20 μM ± 1). ICD-1 is active across a wider pH range than ICD-2, retaining 33–35% activity in an acidic pH upto 5.5. Difference in thermal behaviour is also observed with ICD-2 being active across wider temperature range (20°C to 40°C) than ICD-1 (optimum temperature 40°C). The isozymes are NADP(+ )dependent with distinct phylogenetic affiliations; unlike M.tb ICD-2 that groups with bacterial ICDs, M.tb ICD-1 exhibits a closer lineage to eukaryotic NADP(+ )dependent ICDs. CONCLUSION: The data provide experimental evidence to show that the two open reading frames, Rv3339c (ICD-1) and Rv0066c (ICD-2), annotated as probable ICDs are functional TCA cycle enzymes with identical enzymatic function but different physio-chemical and kinetic properties. The differences in biochemical and kinetic properties suggest the possibility of differential expression of the two ICDs during different stages of growth, despite having identical metabolic function. BioMed Central 2005-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC1260013/ /pubmed/16194279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2091-6-20 Text en Copyright © 2005 Banerjee et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Banerjee, Sharmistha
Nandyala, Ashok
Podili, RaviPrasad
Katoch, Vishwa Mohan
Hasnain, Seyed E
Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isocitrate dehydrogenases (ICD-1 and ICD-2) reveals differences in coenzyme affinity, oligomeric state, pH tolerance and phylogenetic affiliation
title Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isocitrate dehydrogenases (ICD-1 and ICD-2) reveals differences in coenzyme affinity, oligomeric state, pH tolerance and phylogenetic affiliation
title_full Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isocitrate dehydrogenases (ICD-1 and ICD-2) reveals differences in coenzyme affinity, oligomeric state, pH tolerance and phylogenetic affiliation
title_fullStr Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isocitrate dehydrogenases (ICD-1 and ICD-2) reveals differences in coenzyme affinity, oligomeric state, pH tolerance and phylogenetic affiliation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isocitrate dehydrogenases (ICD-1 and ICD-2) reveals differences in coenzyme affinity, oligomeric state, pH tolerance and phylogenetic affiliation
title_short Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isocitrate dehydrogenases (ICD-1 and ICD-2) reveals differences in coenzyme affinity, oligomeric state, pH tolerance and phylogenetic affiliation
title_sort comparison of mycobacterium tuberculosis isocitrate dehydrogenases (icd-1 and icd-2) reveals differences in coenzyme affinity, oligomeric state, ph tolerance and phylogenetic affiliation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1260013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16194279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2091-6-20
work_keys_str_mv AT banerjeesharmistha comparisonofmycobacteriumtuberculosisisocitratedehydrogenasesicd1andicd2revealsdifferencesincoenzymeaffinityoligomericstatephtoleranceandphylogeneticaffiliation
AT nandyalaashok comparisonofmycobacteriumtuberculosisisocitratedehydrogenasesicd1andicd2revealsdifferencesincoenzymeaffinityoligomericstatephtoleranceandphylogeneticaffiliation
AT podiliraviprasad comparisonofmycobacteriumtuberculosisisocitratedehydrogenasesicd1andicd2revealsdifferencesincoenzymeaffinityoligomericstatephtoleranceandphylogeneticaffiliation
AT katochvishwamohan comparisonofmycobacteriumtuberculosisisocitratedehydrogenasesicd1andicd2revealsdifferencesincoenzymeaffinityoligomericstatephtoleranceandphylogeneticaffiliation
AT hasnainseyede comparisonofmycobacteriumtuberculosisisocitratedehydrogenasesicd1andicd2revealsdifferencesincoenzymeaffinityoligomericstatephtoleranceandphylogeneticaffiliation